Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 January 2017
The outstanding role of the intellectual in modern Russian history is beyond dispute. Among non-Communist historians there is a well-established consensus concerning the nature of the Russian intelligentsia and the distinctive part it played in bringing on the revolution. The nineteenth-century Russian intellectual was detached from practical affairs, committed to some abstract doctrine, and morally alienated by autocracy and class privilege. This reaction resulted from the cultural precociousness of Russia's westernized upper class, as contrasted with the frustrating backwardness of the government and the economy. Educated and sensitive Russians had nowhere to turn except to theory.
The cultural cleavage between this theorizing elite and the toiling masses has left traces even today—for example, in the official classification of the Soviet population into workers, peasants, and “toiling intelligentsia,” and in the remarkable prestige enjoyed by academic pursuits in Russia.
1 See Footman, David, Red Prelude: The Life of the Russian Terrorist Zhelyabov(New Haven: Yale University Press, 1945), pp. 244–57.Google Scholar
2 Lenin, , “One Step Forward, Two Steps Back” (May, 1904),Selected Works (Moscow, 1950), 1-1, 456, 481, 545, 609, 618-19.Google Scholar
3 Lenin, “Disruption of Unity under Cover of Outcries for Unity” (May, 1914),Selected Works, 1-2, 256.
4 Lenin to the Central Committee, October 19, 1917,Collected Works (New York, 1927-), XXI-2, 136.
5 Stalin at the Fifteenth Party Congress, December, 1927 (Stenographic Report, Moscow, 1928, p . 74).
6 Lenin, , “The State and Revolution,” Selected Works, II– l, 314.Google Scholar
7 Lenin, , “Will the Bolsheviks Retain State Power?” Collected Works (New York, 1927), XXI–2, 33.Google Scholar
8 Feldmesser, Robert A., “The Persistence of Status Advantages in Soviet Russia,” American Journal of Sociology, LIX (July, 1953), 19-27.Google Scholar