No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 January 2017
It was not surprising that after the death of Stalin, early in 1953, the new regime should take another look at the condition of Soviet agriculture. While agricultural output had probably reached prewar levels, the needs of the state had risen, too, especially since the urban population had continued to grow steadily. Responding to the problem of insufficient supply, the regime introduced a number of projects and reforms designed, if not to solve, at least to alleviate some of its aspects. Millions of acres of little used or unused land were plowed and cultivated; there were attempts to improve the livestock feed base through the wider cultivation of corn; the Machine and Tractor Stations were abolished and the system of procurements was changed; and further efforts were made to increase yields per acre through improved methods of land utilization. Still more comprehensive in its scope was the call for a national inventory of both the natural and economic conditions of crop cultivation and livestock raising, whose objective was the establishment of a more “scientific” scheme of agricultural regionalization of the country in order to ensure more effective planning than had hitherto taken place.
1 Since 1953 the Soviet regime has set as its goal the overtaking of the United States in the per capita production of basic foodstuffs.
2 Saushkin, Y. G., Economic Geography of the Soviet Union (Oslo: Oslo University Press, 1957), p. 65.Google Scholar
3
No. 1, 1954, pp. 3-6; 
No. 1, 1954, pp. 3-6.
4 These statements are summarized from both of the above editorials.
5 Saushkin, op. cit., pp. 79-81; 
XVIII-XX 66 (Moscow, 1957), pp. 133-40.
6 Saushkin, loc. cit.
7 Arsenev divided Russia into regions on the basis of the following criteria: (a) the way and method of utilizing the land; (b) a surplus or deficit of agricultural production; and (3) fodder resources and animal husbandry. The ten regions included: North, Northwest, Baltic, West, Carpathians, Steppe, Central, Urals, Caucasus, Siberia. Arsenev further subdivided these regions on the basis of their specialization; i.e., Northwest—where Arsenev recognized a specialization in flax cultivation and, in the suburbs of St. Petersburg, vegetable gardening.
8
CCCP (Moscow, 1959), pp. 89-90; 
op. cit., pp. 300-317.
9
(1941), III, 227-28. See also 
1957, pp. 79-89.
10
op. cit., pp. 266-69.
11 Political Economy (London, 1957), pp. 526-43.
12
1925-1939 (Moscow, 1941), pp. 393-436.
13
(Moscow-Leningrad, 1930), pp. 33-34. Iakovlev was People's Commissar of Agriculture.
14
No. 7,1930, p. 76.
15 People's Commissariat of Agriculture.
16
op. cit., pp. 36, 38.
17
(Moscow-Leningrad, 1931), p. 214.
18 Ibid., pp. 220-21.
19 Stalin, J., Problems of Leninism (Moscow, 1953), pp. 616-17.Google Scholar
20 Douglas Jackson, W. A., “The Russian Non-Chernozem Wheat Base,” Annals, A.A.G., XLIX, No. 2 (1959), 97-109.Google Scholar
21
(Moscow, 1958), p. 87.
Balzak, S. S., Vasyutin, V. F., and Feigin, Ya. G., eds., Economic Geography of the USSR (New York, 1949), p. 357.Google Scholar
22 See 
CCCP (Moscow, 1948, 1951). The map is somewhat modified in 
CCCP (Moscow, 1946), pp. 194-95.
23
CCCP (Moscow, 1953), p. 68.
24 See 
(Moscow, 1951,1953).
25
(Moscow, 1957), p. 23.
26
No. 1, 1959, p. 28.
27
(Moscow, 1957), p. 6.
28
p. 21.
29
No. 4, 1955, pp. 61 ff.
30 Letunov, P. A., Ivanovo, Ye. N., Rozov, N. N., and others, “A Soils and Bioclimatic Regionalization of the USSR,” Soviet Geography: Review and Translation, October, 1960, p. 33.Google Scholar
31
No. 2, 1958, p. 277.
32 Gvozdetskiy, N. A., “The Physical-Geographic Regionalization of the USSR for Agricultural Purposes,” Soviet Geography: Review and Translation, November, 1960, pp. 5 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33 Letunov, op. cit., pp. 33-41.
34 Gvozdetskiy, op. cit.
35
pp. 10-12.
36
Ibid., pp. 6-7. See also 
No . 7, 1955, p. 72; 
pp. 61-62.
37 Nikishov, M. I., “Experience in Distinguishing Agricultural Zones and Regions on the Agricultural Map of the USSR,” Soviet Geography: Review and Translation, December, 1960, p. 26.Google Scholar
38
in 
(Moscow, 1960), pp. 357-79. See also his 
(Moscow, 1959), pp. 74-104.
39
op. cit., p. 280.
40 James, Preston E. and Jones, Clarence F., eds., American Geography: Inventory and Prospect (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1954), pp. 262-65.Google Scholar
41 Hartshorne, Richard, The Nature of Geography (Lancaster, Pa., 1939), pp. 267-72 ff.Google Scholar