Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:16:50.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Environmental Effects on Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Chinese Adolescent Monozygotic Twins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

C.J. Chen*
Affiliation:
Institute of Public Health, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
B.H. Cohen
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
E.L. Diamond
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
T.M. Lin
Affiliation:
Institute of Public Health, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
J.S. Chen
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Pathology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
*
Institute of Public Health, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan 100

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The monozygotic (MZ) cotwin control method was employed to elucidate possible environmental determinants of systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels. A population-based twin sample of 73 male and 77 females MZ twin pairs was recruited from 12 junior high schools in Taipei city. Intrapair differences in blood pressure were negatively associated with intrapair difference in vegetable preference, attaining significance for DBP in males and SBP in females. Cholesterol was positively associated with milk consumption and preference for sweets, fried foods, meat and fish. A negative association was also observed between choleserol and vegetable preference. These associations for cholesterol were significant in males only. Triglyceride level negatively associated with preferences for sweets and vegetable, attaining significance for vegetables in both males and females and for sweets in males only.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1984

References

REFERENCES

1.Abboud, FM (1974): Effects of sodium, angiotensin, and steroids on vascular reactivity in man. Federation Proceedings 33:143.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Berenson, GS (1980): Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Children. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
3.Chen, CJ, Cohen, BH, Diamon, EL, et al (1984): Genetic variance and heritability of cardiovascular risk factors in Chinese adolescent twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 33:363373.Google Scholar
4.Coleman, TG, Granger, HJ, Guyton, AC (1971): Whole body circulatory autoregulation and hypertension. Circulation Research 28/29: 1176.Google Scholar
5.Connor, WE (1980): Cross-cultural studies of diet and plasma lipids and lipoproteins. In Lauer, RM, Shekelle, RB (eds): Childhood Prevention of Atherosclerosis and Hypertension. New York: Raven Press, p 99.Google Scholar
6.Crysant, SG, Walsh, GM, Kern, DC, et al (1979): Hemodynamic and metabolic evidence of salt sensitivity in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Kidnoy International 15:33.Google Scholar
7.Dahl, LK (1960): Possible role of salt intake in the development of essential hypertension. In Bock, KD, Cottier, PJ (eds): Essential Hypertension. 2nd International Symposium. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
8.Dahl, LK, Knudsen, KD, Heine, M, et al (1967): Effects of chronic excess salt ingestion. Genetic influence on the development of salt hypertension in parabiotic rats: evidence for a humor factor. J Experiment Med 126:687.Google Scholar
9.Dibble, E, Cohen, DJ, Grawe, JM (1978): Methodological issues in twin study: the assumption of environmental equivalence. In Nance, WE (ed): Twin Research: Psychology and Methodology. New York: Alan R Liss Inc., p 245.Google Scholar
10.Elston, RC, Boklage, CE (1978): An examination of fundamental assumptions of the twin method. In Nance, WE (ed): Twin Research: Psychology and Methodology. New York: Alan R Liss Inc., p 189.Google Scholar
11.Eysenck, SBG (1965): Manual of the Junior Eysenck Personality Inventory. London, University of London Press.Google Scholar
12.Freis, ED (1976): Salt, volume and the prevention of hypertension. Circulation 53:589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Keys, A (1970): Coronary heart disease in seven countries. Circulation 41 (suppl 1): 1.Google Scholar
14.Kirkendall, WM, Connor, WE, Abboud, F, et al (1976): The effect of dietary sodium chloride on blood pressure, body fluids, electrolytes, renal function, and serum lipids of normotensive man. J Lab Clin Med 87:418.Google Scholar
15.Lilienfeld, AM (1961): Problems and areas in genetic-epidemiologic field studies. Ann New York Acad Sci 91:797805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Luft, FC, Rankin, LI, Bloch, R, et al (1979): Cardiovascular and humoral responses to extremes of sodium intake in normal black and white men. Circulation 60:697.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17.Meneely, GR, Batterbee, HD (1976): High sodium-low potassium environment and hypertension. Am J Cardiol 38:768.Google Scholar
18.Oliver, WJ, Cohen, EL, Neel, JV (1975): Blood pressure, sodium intake, and sodium related hormones in the Yamamo Indians: a “no-salt” culture. Circulation 52:146.Google Scholar
19.Page, LB, Damon, A, Moellering, RC Jr (1974): Antecedents of cardiovascular disease in six Solomon Island societies. Circulation 49:1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Prior, IAM, Grimley-Evans, JG, Harvey, HPB, et al (1968): Sodium intake and blood pressure in two Polynesian populations. N Engl J Med 279:515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Sacks, FM, Rosner, B, Kass, EH (1974): Blood pressure in vegetarians. Am J Epidemiol 100:390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22.Smith, RT (1965): A comparison of socioenvironmental factors in monozygotic and dizygotic twins: Testing an assumption. In Vandenberg, SG (ed): Methods and Goals in Human Behavior Genetics. New York, Academic Press, p 45.Google Scholar