Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T11:05:10.449Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epidemiological Characteristics of Twinning Rates in Taiwan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

C.-J. Chen*
Affiliation:
Institute of Public Health, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
T.-M. Lin
Affiliation:
Institute of Public Health, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
C. Chang
Affiliation:
Institute of Public Health, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
Y.-J. Cheng
Affiliation:
Institute of Public Health, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
*
Institute of Public Health, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Jen-Ai Rd. Sec. 1, Taipei, Taiwan

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Delivery records of public hospitals and birth certificates of household registration offices were examined to study the epidemiological characteristics of twinning rate from 1955 to 1984 in Taiwan. The MZ twinning rate was consistently higer than the DZ rate during the study period. The DZ rate declined steadily from 2.7 per 1000 in 1955 to 1.3 per 1000 in 1975, and then gradually increased to 3.6 per 1000 in 1984. The MZ rate peaked periodically in 1956, 1966 and 1976, and gradually increased from 3.3 per 1000 in 1978 to 5.9 per 1000 in 1986. Both MZ and DZ rates were higher in urban than in rural areas and they were also higher in northern Taiwan than elsewhere in the island. While both MZ and DZ rates increased with maternal age and parity, the maternal age difference and the parity difference were more striking in DZ than in MZ rates. The international comparison also showed a greater racial difference in maternal age-specific DZ than MZ twinning rates; and the older the maternal age, the greater the international discrepancy in DZ rates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1987

References

REFERENCES

1.Allen, G, Schachter, J (1971): Ease of conception in mothers of twins. Soc Biol 18: 1827.Google Scholar
2.Brackenridge, CJ (1977): The secular variation of Australian twin births over fifty years. Ann Human Biol 4: 559564.Google Scholar
3.Brunecky, Z, Zahalkova, M (1973): The genetic characteristics of South-Moravian twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol Suppl 22:231233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Bulmer, MG (1957): The numbers of human multiple births. Ann Hum Genet 22: 158164.Google Scholar
5.Bulmer, MG (1959): The effect of paiental age, parity and duration of marriage on the twinning rate. Ann Hum Genet 23: 454458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Bulmer, MG (1976): Is Weinberg's method valid? Acta Genet Med Gemellol 25: 2528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Czeizel, A (1973): Unexplainable demographic phenomena of multiple births in Hungary. Acta Genet Med Gemellol Suppl 22: 214218.Google Scholar
8.Dean, G, Keane, T (1972): An investigation of the high twinning rate in the Republic of Ireland. Br J Prevent Soc Med 26: 186192.Google ScholarPubMed
9.Elwood, JM (1973): Changes in the twinning rate in Canada in 1926-1970. Br J Prevent Soc Med 27:236241.Google Scholar
10.Eriksson, AW, Eskola, MR, Fellman, JO (1976): Retrospective studies on the twinning rate in Scandinavia. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 25: 2935.Google Scholar
11.Gittelsohn, A, Milham, S (1964): Statistical study of twins: Methods. Am J Public Healt 54: 286294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Gittelsohn, A, Milham, S (1965): Observations on twinning in New York state. Br J Prevent Soc Med 19: 817.Google ScholarPubMed
13.Imaizumi, Y, Inouye, E (1979): Analysis of multiple birth rates in Japan: 1. Secular trend, maternal age effect, and geographical variation in twinning rates. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 28: 107124.Google Scholar
14.James, WH (1972): Coital rates and dizygotic twinning. J Biosoc Sci 4: 101105.Google Scholar
15.James, WH (1972): Secular changes in dizygotic twinning rates. J Biosoc Sci 4: 427434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.James, WH (1975): The secular decline in dizygotic twinning rates in Italy. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 24: 914.Google Scholar
17.Jeanneret, O, MacMahon, B (1962): Secular changes in rates of multiple births in the United States. Am J Hum Genet 14: 410425.Google ScholarPubMed
18.Komai, T, Fukuoka, G (1936): Frequency of multiple births among Japanese and related peoples. Am J Phys Anthropol 21: 433447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Konefka, H (1973): Multiple pregnancy induced by ovary hyperstimulation. Acta Genet Med Gemellol Suppl 22: 193194.Google Scholar
20.Krueger, J, Propping, P (1976): Twinning frequencies in Baden-Wurttemberg according to maternal age and parity from 1955 to 1972. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 25: 3640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21.Lin, RS, Chen, KP (1968): A preliminary twin study in Taiwan: 1. Epidemiological aspect. J Formosan Med Assoc 67: 329343.Google Scholar
22.Myrianthopoulos, NC (1970): An epidemiologic survey of twins in a large, prospectively studied population. Am J Hum Genet 22: 611629.Google Scholar
23.Nielson, J, Homma, A, Isaksen, B, Bertelsen, A (1978): Incidence of twin births in Denmark from 1911-1974. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 27: 4550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Nylander, PPS (1973): Pituitary gonadotropins and multiple births in Nigeria. Acta Genet Med Gemellol Suppl 22:198291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Papiernik-Berkhaurer, E, Ades, A, Konwinski, T (1973): Oocyte overripeness relation to multiple pregnancy: An epidemiologic study. Acta Genet Med Gemellol Suppl 22: 191192.Google Scholar
26.Republic of China, Administration of Health. Annual (1947-1980): Health Statistics. Taipei: Administration of Health.Google Scholar
27.Republic of China, Ministry of Interior. Annual (1972-1977): Demographic Facts in Taiwan Area. Taipei: Ministry of Interior.Google Scholar
28.Rola Janicki, A (1973): Multiple births in Poland in 1949-1971. Acta Genet Med Gemellol Suppl 22: 202209.Google Scholar
29.Shipley, PW, Wray, JA, Hechter, H, Arellano, MGBorhani, NO (1967): Frequency of twinning in California: Its relationship to maternal age, parity and race. Am J Epidemiol 85: 147156.Google Scholar
30.Wishak, G (1975): Twinning rates among women at the end of their reproductive span and their relation to age at menopause. Am J Epidemiol 102: 170178.Google Scholar
31.Zahalkova, M (1973): Multiple births in Southern Moravia. Acta Genet Med Gemellol Suppl 22: 210213.Google Scholar