Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T10:13:16.959Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimates of Genetic Variance for Some Selected Morphometric Characters: A Twin Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

J.C. Sharma  and
K. Sharma
J.C. Sharma*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India
K. Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India
*
T1/16 Sector 25, Chandigarh 160014, India

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Results on genetic variability in some of the morphometric characters on head and face, body girths and skin folds, based on 45 MZ and 67 like-sex DZ twin pairs, are presented. The data were subjected to a method which eliminated possible biases in the estimated genetic variances that could result from heterogeneity of total variances between zygosities of the 17 head and face measurements, heterogeneity was observed for only bizygomatic diameter. Head breadth means differed between MZ and DZ twins, indicating bias in the trait's genetic variance analysis. The results indicated a significant genetic component in these morphometric traits. For 11 girth and skinfold measurements, the t'-test based on hierarchical structure of twin data, also failed to reveal any appreciable difference between the mean values of MZ and DZ twins. Heterogeneity of total variance between zygosities was observed for three skinfold measurements, ie, biceps, triceps and suprailiac. The girth measurements, however, did not reveal any heterogeneity of total variances between the zygosities. The estimates of genetic variance revealed stronger genetic component for the girths than for the skinfolds.

Keywords

Genetic varianceMorphometric charactersTwins
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , July 1984 , pp. 509 - 514
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1984

References

REFERENCES

1.Christian, JC (1979): Testing twin means and estimating genetic variance. Basic methodology for the analysis of quantitative twin data. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 28:35–40.Google Scholar
2.Christian, JC,, Kang, KW, Norton, JA (1974): Choice of an estimate of genetic variance from twin data. Am J Hum Genet 26:154–161.Google Scholar
3.Christian, JC, Norton, JA (1977): A proposed test of the difference between the means of monozygotic and dizygotic twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 26:49–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Christian, JC, Kang, KW, Norton, JA (1977): Comparison of within-pair and among component estimates of genetic variance from twin data. Am J Hum Genet 29:208–210.Google Scholar
5.Corruccini, RS, Potter, RH (1980): Genetic analysis of occlusal variation in twins. Am J Orthod 78:140–154.Google Scholar
6.Horowitz, SL, Osborne, RH, DeGeorge, FV (1960): A cephalometric study of cranio-facial variation in adult twins. Angle Orthod 30:1–5.Google Scholar
7.Kempthome, O, Osborne, RH (1961): The interpretation of twin data. Am J Hum Genet 13:320–339.Google Scholar
8.Lundstrom, A (1954): The importance of genetic and non-genetic factors in the facial skeleton studied in 100 pairs of twins. Trans Europ Orthod Soc 30:92–107.Google Scholar
9.Martin, R, Saller, K (1957): Lehrbuch der Anthropologie. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
10.Nakata, M, Yu, P, Davis, B, Nance, WE (1973): The use of genetic data in the prediction of craniofacial dimensions. Am J Orthod 63:471–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Nakata, M, Yu, P, Davis, B, Nance, WE (1974): Genetic determinants of cranio-facial morphology: A twin study. Ann Hum Genet 37:431–443.Google Scholar
12.Nakata, M, Yu, P, Nance, WE (1976): On facial similarity in relatives. Hum Biol 48:611–621.Google Scholar
13.Osborne, RH, DeGeorge, FC (1959): Genetic Basis of Morphological Variations. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Potter, RH, Yu, P, Christian, JC (1979): Association of twin zygosity with the mean and variance of tooth size. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 28:211–223.Google ScholarPubMed
15.Reed, T, Sprague, FR, Kang, KW, Nance, WE, Christian, JC (1975): Genetic analysis of dermato-glyphic patterns in twins. Hum Hered 25:263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Sharma, JC, Vashishth, P (1976): Hereditary basis of morphological variations - A study based on younger twins. Indian J Phys Anthrop Hum Genet 2:27–78.Google Scholar
17.Vandenberg, SG (1962): How stable are heritability estimates? A comparison of heritability estimates from six anthropometric studies. Am J Phys Anthrop 20:331–338.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.Vandenberg, SG, Strandskov, HH (1964): A comparison of identical and fraternal twins in some anthropometric measures. Hum Biol 36:45–52.Google ScholarPubMed
19.Watnick, SS (1972): Inheritance of craniofacial morphology. Angle Orthod, 42:339–351.Google ScholarPubMed
20.Weiner, JS, Lourie, JA (1969): Human Biology: A Guide to Field Methods. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar