Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:29:25.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic Influences on Neonatal Temperament

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

M.L. Riese
M.L. Riese*
Affiliation:
Louisville Twin Study, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Kentucky, USA
*
Louisville Twin Study, Child Development Unit, Health Sciences Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The genetic contribution to temperament was assessed during the neonatal period in 172 newborn infants from 47 pairs of monozygotic (MZ) and 39 pairs of same-sex dizygotic (DZ) twins. Zygosity was not related to the neonatal temperament variables. Examination of the scores for twin concordance indicated significant within-pair concordance in temperament ratings, but MZ twins were not more like each other than DZ twins. The results suggested that neonatal temperament was influenced by environmental factors. Further analyses indicated that neonatal temperament was influenced by perinatal variables such as birth weight, 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores, and number of days spent in the hospital. It was concluded that there was no clear pattern of genetic influence on neonatal temperament, and that nonshared environmental factors were an important source of variance for temperament during this period.

Keywords

Neonatal temperamentTwins
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , April 1990 , pp. 207 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1990

References

REFERENCES

1.Bayley, N (1969): Manual for Bayley Scales of Infant Development. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
2.Garrett, HE (1955): Statistics in Psychology and Education. New York: Longmans Green.Google Scholar
3.Matheny, AP Jr (1980): Bayley's Infant Behavior Record: Behavioral components and twin analyses. Child Dev 51:1157–1167.Google Scholar
4.Matheny, AP Jr, Wilson, RS, Dolan, AB, Krantz, JZ (1981): Behavioral contrasts in twinships: Stability and patterns of differences in childhood. Child Dev 52:579–588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Riese, ML (1982): Procedures and norms for asseseing behavioral patterns in full-term and stable pre-term neonates. JSAS Catalog Selected Doc Psychol 12:6 (Ms. No. 2415).Google Scholar
6.Riese, ML (1983): Assessment of behavioral patterns in neonates. Infant Behav Dev 6:241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Torgersen, AM, Kringlen, B (1978): Genetic aspects of temperamental differences in infants. Am Academy Child Psychiat 17:433–444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Wilson, RS (1979): Analysis of longitudinal twin data: Basic model and applications to physical growth measure. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 28:93–105.Google Scholar
9.Wilson, RS (1980): Bloodtyping and twin zygosity: Reassesement and extension. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 29:103–129.Google Scholar
10.Wilson, RS, Matheny, AP Jr (1986): Behavior-genetics research in infant temperament: The Louisville Twin Study. In Plomin, R, Dunn, J (ede): The Study of Temperament: Changes, Continuities, and Challenges. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp 81–97.Google Scholar