Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:56:00.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth Characteristics in Twins and Higher Order Multiple Births

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

J.M.H. Buckler  and
J.B. Buckler
J.M.H. Buckler*
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Leeds, UK
J.B. Buckler
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Leeds, UK
*
Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, D Floor, Clarendon Wing, The General Infirmary, Leeds LS2 9NS, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Measurements of height and weight have been undertaken on 201 pairs of twins and 46 sets of higher multiples once each at various ages through childhood. The heights of twins are comparable to the overall population of singletons, those of higher multiples are slightly undersized. However, the total group of twins were shorter than expected when compared with the heights of parents and siblings, but this was entirely accounted for by that component of the group who at birth had been very light for dates. The children in all groups of multiples were underweight for their height in comparison with standards of a comparable population and with their own siblings.

Keywords

TwinsHigher multiplesHeightWeightSize at birth
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , April 1987 , pp. 197 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1987

References

REFERENCES

1.Cederlof, R, Friberg, L, Jonsson, E, Kaij, L (1961): Studies on similarity diagnosis in twins with the aid of mailed questionnaires. Acta Genet 11: 338–362.Google ScholarPubMed
2.Cohen, DJ, Dibble, E, Grawe, JM, Pollin, W (1975): Reliably separating identical from fraternal twins. Arch Gen Psychiatry 32: 1371–1375.Google Scholar
3.Corney, G, Seedburgh, D, Thompson, B, Campbell, DM, MacGillivray, I, Timlin, D (1979): Maternal height and twinning. Ann Hum Genet 43: 55–59.Google Scholar
4.Kasriel, J, Eaves, L (1976): The zygosity of twins, further evidence of the agreement between diagnosis by blood groups and written questionnaires. J Biosoc Sci 8: 263–266.Google Scholar
5.Ljung, BO, Fischbein, S, Lindgren, G (1977): A comparison of growth in twins and singleton controls of matched age followed longitudinally from 10-18 years. Ann Hum Biol 4: 405–415.Google Scholar
6.MacGillivray, I (1975): Labour in multiple pregnancies. In MacGillivray, I, Nylander, PPS, Corney, G (eds): Human Multiple Reproduction. London: W.B. Saunders, pp 124–136.Google Scholar
7.MacGillivray, I (1975): Management of multiple pregnancies. In MacGillivray, I, Nylander, PPS, Corney, G (eds): Human Multiple Reproduction. London: W.B. Saunders, pp 147–164.Google Scholar
8.McKeown, T, Record, RG (1952): Observations on foetal growth in multiple pregnancy in man. J. Endocrinol 8: 386–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Silva, PA, Crosado, B (1985): The growth and development of twins compared with singletons at ages 9 and 11. Aust Paediatr J 21:265–267.Google Scholar
10.Tanner, JM, Whitehouse, RH, Takaishi, M (1966): Standards from birth to maturity for height, weight, height velocity, and weight velocity: British children, 1965. Arch Dis Child 41: 454–471 and 613–625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Tanner, JM, Thomson, AM (1970): Standards for birth weight at gestation periods from 32 to 42 weeks, allowing for maternal height and weight. Arch Dis Child 45: 566–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Thomson, AM, Billewicz, WZ, Hytten, FE (1968): The assessment of fetal growth. J Obstet Gynecol Brit Cwlth 75: 903.Google Scholar
13.Wilson, RS (1974): Growth standards for twins from birth to four years. Ann Hum Biol 1: 175–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Wilson, RS (1979): Twin growth: Initial deficit, recovery, and trends in concordance from birth to nine years. Ann Hum Biol 6: 205–220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed