Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T19:26:20.070Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How Frequent Is Heteropaternal Superfecundation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

R.E. Wenk ,
T. Houtz ,
M. Brooks  and
F.A. Chiafari
R.E. Wenk*
Affiliation:
Rh Typing Laboratory, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
T. Houtz
Affiliation:
Rh Typing Laboratory, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
M. Brooks
Affiliation:
Rh Typing Laboratory, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
F.A. Chiafari
Affiliation:
Rh Typing Laboratory, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
*
Baltimore, Rh Typing Laboratory, 400 West Franklin Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A newly discovered case of heteropaternal superfecundation (HS) is reported. Three HS cases were found in a parentage test database of 39,000 records. The frequency of HS among dizygotic twins whose parents were involved in paternity suits is 2.4%. Although the study population appears similar to the general population with respect to twinning data, inferences about the frequency of HS in other populations should be drawn with caution.

Keywords

HeteropaternityParentageSuperfecundation
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , January 1992 , pp. 43 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1992

References

REFERENCES

1.Archer, J (1810): Facts illustrating a disease peculiar to the female children of Negro slaves. Medical Repository (Maryland) 1: 319–323.Google Scholar
2.Forrest, JD, Singh, S (1990): The sexual and reproductive behavior of American women, 1982-1988. Farn Plann Perspect 22: 206–214.Google Scholar
3.James, WH (1984): Coitus-induced ovulation and its implications for estimates of some reproductive parameters. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 33: 547–555.Google Scholar
4.Levitan, M (1989): Textbook of Human Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press p 353.Google Scholar
5.Phelan, MC, Pellock, JM, Nance, WE (1982): Discordant expression of fetal hydantoin syndrome in heteropaternal dizygotic twins. N Engl J Med 307: 99–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Radasch, HE (1921): Superfoetation or superfecundation? Surg Gynecol Obstet 32: 339–352.Google Scholar
7.Rosner, F (1979): Superfecundation in mythology, history and poetry. N Engl J Med 300: 49.Google Scholar
8.Sorgo, G (1973): Das Problem der Superfoecundation in Vaterschafsgutachten. Beitr Gerichtl Med 30: 415–421.Google Scholar
9.Spielmann, W, Kuhnl, P (1980): The efficacy of modern blood group genetics with regard to a case of probable superfecundation. Haematol Hung 13: 75–85.Google Scholar
10.Standards for Parentage Testing Laboratories (1991): J. Gottschall Edit, First Ed Am Assoc Blood Banks. Arlington VA, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
11.Terasaki, PI, Gjertson, D, Bernoco, D, Mickey, R (1978): Twins with two different fathers identified by HLA. N. Engl. J. Med. 299: 590–592.Google Scholar
12.Wenk, RE, Brooks, M, Houtz, T (1986): Heteropaternal dizygotic twinning: evidence of human superfecundation. Lab. Med. 17: 526–528.Google Scholar
13.Wenk, RE, Houtz, T, Chiafari, F, Brooks, M: Superfecundation identified by HLA, protein and VNTR DNA polymorphisms. Transfusion Med. (in press).Google Scholar