Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:50:11.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Incidence of Superfecundation and of Double Paternity in the General Population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

W. H. James*
Affiliation:
The Galton Laboratory, Department of Genetics and Biometry, University College, London
*
Galton Laboratory, Wolfson House, University College London, 4 Stephenson Way, London NW1 2HE, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is estimated that at least one dizygotic (DZ) twin maternity in twelve is preceded by superfecundation (the fertilization of two ova by sperm from different coitions). Presumably this parameter varies from population to population eg. with coital rates and rates of double ovulation. Sometimes superfecundation occurs by two different men. The frequency with which this occurs must depend on rates of infidelity (promiscuity). It is suggested that among DZ twins born to married white women in the U.S., about one pair in 400 is bipaternal. The incidence may be substantially higher in small selected groups of dizygotic twin maternities, eg. those of women engaged in prostitution.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1993

References

REFERENCES

1. Ashton, GC (1980): Mismatches in genetic markers in a large family study. Am J Hum Genet 32: 601613.Google Scholar
2. Bellis, MA, Baker, RR (1990): Do females promote sperm competition? Anim Behav 40: 997999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Baker, RR, Bellis, MA (1993): Human sperm competition: ejaculate adjustment by males and the function of masturbation. Anim Behav 46:861885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Baker, RR, Bellis, MA (1993): Human sperm competition: ejaculate manipulation by females and a function for the female orgasm. Anim Behav 46: 887909.Google Scholar
5. Brock, DJH, Shrimpton, AE (1991): Non-paternity and prenatal genetic screening. Lancet 338: 1151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Bulmer, MG (1970): The Biology of Human Twinning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
7. Edwards, JH (1957): A critical examination of the reputed primary influence of ABO pheno-type on fertility and sex ratio. Br J Prev Soc Med 11:7989.Google Scholar
8. James, WH (1972): Coital rates and dizygotic twinning. J Biosoc Sci 4:101105.Google Scholar
9. James, WH (1984): Coitus-induced ovulation and its implications for estimates of some reproductive parameters. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 33: 547555.Google Scholar
10. Johnstone, JM (1954): Heterospecific pregnancy. Br J Prev Soc Med 8:117123.Google Scholar
11. Le Roux, M-G, Pascal, O, Andre, M-T, Herbert, O, David, A, Moisan, J-P (1992): Non-paternity and genetic counselling Lancet 340:607.Google Scholar
12. Le Roux, M-G, Pascal, O, David, A, Moisan, J-P (1993): Non-paternity rate and screening in genetic disease analysis. Lancet 341:57.Google Scholar
13. Macintyre, S, Sooman, A (1991): Non-paternity and prenatal genetic screening. Lancet 338: 869871.Google Scholar
14. Peritz, E, Rust, PF (1972) On the estimation of the nonpaternity rate using more than one blood group system. Am J Hum Genet 24: 4653.Google Scholar
15. Radasch, HE (1921): Superfoetation or superfecundation? Surg Gynecol Obstet 32: 339352.Google Scholar
16. Roldan, ERS, Gomendio, M, Vitullo, AD (1992): The evolution of eutherian spermatozoa and underlying selective forces: female selection and sperm competition. Biol Rev 67: 551593.Google Scholar
17. Royston, JP (1982): Basal body temperature, ovulation and the risk of conception with special reference to the lifetimes of sperm and egg. Biometrics 38: 397406.Google Scholar
18. Schacht, LE, Gershowitz, H (1961): Frequency of extramarital children as determined by blood groups. In Brockington, F, Francois, J, Gedda, L et al. (eds): Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Human Genetics. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica pp. E39E40.Google Scholar
19. Terasaki, PI (1978): Resolution by HLA testing of 1000 paternity cases not excluded by ABO testing. Journal of Family Law 16: 543557.Google Scholar
20. Terasaki, PI, Gjertson, D, Bernoco, D, Perdue, S, Mickey, MR, Bond, J (1978) Twins with different fathers identified by HLA. New Engl J Med 299: 590592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Wenk, RE, Houtz, T, Brooks, M, Chiafari, FA (1992): How frequent is heteropaternal super-fecundation? Acta Genet Med Gemellol 41: 4347.Google Scholar