Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:37:43.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Mouse-Strain-Specific Factors on Position-Dependent Transgene DNA Methylation Patterns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

P.A. Koetsier  and
W. Doerfler
P.A. Koetsier
Affiliation:
Institute of Genetics, University of Cologne, Germany
W. Doerfler*
Affiliation:
Institute of Genetics, University of Cologne, Germany
*
Institut für Genetik, Universität zu Köln, Weyertal 121 – D-50931, Köln, Germany. E-mail: doerfler@scan.genetik.uni-koeln.de.

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In previous work from this laboratory, an inverse dependence was established for the adenovirus type 2 E2A late promoter between sequence-specific DNA methylation and promoter activity [1-5; for reviews see ref. 6, 7]. The effect of DNA methylation on promoter activity was also assessed in the transgenic mice, which were obtained from microinjections of unmethylated or in vitro HpaII-premethylated pAd2E2AL-CAT DNA [1] into F2 zygotes from B6D2F, (C57BL/6 × DBA/2) hybrid mice. In CAT assays carried out on organ extracts from the pAd2E2AL-CAT mice, the inverse relationship was confirmed [2].

We studied the stability of the pAd2E2AL-CAT DNA methylation patterns in up to eight mouse generations and assessed the influence of the strain-specific genetic background. Three pAd2E2AL-CAT mouse lines were crossed with inbred DBA/2, C57BL/6 or B6D2F, mice. Parent-of-origin effects were controlled by exclusive hemizygous transgene transmission either via females or males. The founder animal of line 7-1 carried two groups of transgenes (A and B) on separate chromosomes. The transgene methylation patterns of the 7-1B transgenes and those of the lines 5-8 and 8-1 were stably transmitted.

Southern blot hybridization experiments [8, 9] revealed that the 7-1A transgene methylation pattern was a cellular mosaic. In mixed-genetic-background offspring from 7-1A animals, 10% carried transgenes with HpaII-DNA methylation levels that were reduced from 40 to 10-15%. This finding suggested that in this background the factors that supported high methylation levels were dominant. When inbred DBA/2 mice were the mates, 40% of the siblings carried demethylated transgenes, whereas this ratio amounted to only 10% in C57BL/6 offspring (comparable to B6D2F1 crossings). Transgene methylation patterns were not detectably influenced by the parent-of-origin.

Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 45 , Issue 1-2 , April 1996 , pp. 243 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1996

References

REFERENCES

1. Langner, KD, Weyer, U, Doerfler, W: Trans effect of the E1 region of adenoviruses on the expression of the procaryotic gene in mammalian cells: Resistance to 5' -CCGG-3' methylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986; 83: 1598–1602.Google Scholar
2. Lettmann, C, Schmitz, B, Doerfler, W: Persistence or loss of preimposed methylation patterns and de novo methylation of foreign DNA integrated in transgenic mice. Nucleic Acids Res 1991; 19: 7131–7137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Muller, U, Doerfler, W: Fixation of the unmethylated or the 5'-CCGG-3' methylated adenovirus late promoter-cat gene construct in the genome of hamster cells: Gene expression and stability of methylation patterns. J Virol 1987; 61: 3710–3720.Google Scholar
4. Toth, M, Lichtenberg, U, Doerfler, W: Genomic sequencing reveals a 5-methyl-cytosine free domain in active promoters and the spreading of preimposed methylation patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989; 86: 3728–3732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Toth, M, Müller, U, Doerfler, W: Establishment of de novo methylation patterns: Transcription factor binding and deoxycytidine methylation at CpG and non-CpG sequences in an integrated adenovirus promoter. J Mol Biol 1990; 214; 673–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Doerfler, W: DNA methylation and gene activity. Annu Rev Biochem 1983; 52: 93–306.Google Scholar
7. Doerfler, W: Adenoviral DNA integration and changes in DNA methylation patterns: different view of insertional mutagenesis. Prog Nucleic Acids Res Mol Biol 1993; 46: 1–36.Google Scholar
8. Koetsier, PA, Schorr, J, Doerfler, W: A rapid optimized protocol for downward alkaline blotting of DNA. Biotechniques 1993; 15: 260–262.Google ScholarPubMed
9. Koetsier, PA, Mangel, L, Schmitz, B, Doerfler, W: Stability of transgene methylation patterns in mice: Position effects, strain specificity and cellular mosaicism. Transgenic Res, in press.Google Scholar