Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:23:08.592Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

No Evidence for Monoallelic Expression of Gnas and Fourteen Other Genes in the Distal Region of Mouse Chromosome 2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

C.M. Williamson*
Affiliation:
Genetics Division, MRC Radiobiology Unit, Chilton, United Kingdom
E.R. Dutton
Affiliation:
Genetics Division, MRC Radiobiology Unit, Chilton, United Kingdom
C.M. Abbot
Affiliation:
MRC Human Genetics Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
C.V. Beechey
Affiliation:
Genetics Division, MRC Radiobiology Unit, Chilton, United Kingdom
S.T. Ball
Affiliation:
Genetics Division, MRC Radiobiology Unit, Chilton, United Kingdom
J. Peters
Affiliation:
Genetics Division, MRC Radiobiology Unit, Chilton, United Kingdom
*
Genetic Division, MRC Radiobiology Unit, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon OX11 ORD, United Kingdom

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Distal chromosome 2 is one of ten regions of the mouse genome subject to parental imprinting. Maternal duplication/paternal deficiency of distal chromosome 2 leads to hypokinetic mice with long flat-sided bodies and arched backs, which fail to suckle and die within a few hours of birth. The reciprocal type, paternal duplication/maternal deficiency, shows an opposite phenotype: the mice have short square bodies and broad flat backs and are distinctly hyperkinetic [1], The region is defined by the breakpoints of two reciprocal translocations, T(2;8)2Wa and T(2;16)28H, is estimated to be about 7.5 Mb in size and shows linkage conservation with human chromosome 20q13. We have tested for monoallelic expression of a number of candidate genes that are either likely or known to lie within the distal imprinting region. These included three-Cebpb, E2f1 and Tc/f4-that express transcription factors, two-Cyp24 and Pck1-that are involved in growth, six-Acra4, Edn3, Kcnb1, Mc3r, Ntsr and Ppgb-where a defect could lead to neurological and probably behavioural problems, three:-Cd40, Plcg1 and Rcad-that are doubtful candidates but whose sequence was available for testing their expression and finally, Gnas, which is our best candidate because there is clinical and biochemical evidence suggesting that its human homologue, GNAS1, is imprinted. On/off expression of each gene was tested by RT-PCR analysis of RNA extracted from tissues of mice with maternal duplication/paternal deficiency and its reciprocal for the distal region of chromosome 2. None of these genes was monoallelically expressed in the appropriate tissues before and after birth, suggesting that they are not imprinted. Evidence for the imprinting of GNAS1 in humans is based on studies of patients with Albright's hereditary osteodystrophy (AHO) who possess a dysfunctional GNAS1 allele. AHO somatic features together-with resistance to parathyroid hormone and other hormones that act via cAMP occur when the defective allele is inherited from the mother whereas AHO somatic features alone occur in paternally transmitted cases [2]. If genomic imprinting regulates Gnas expression in the mouse, then its effect must be specifically confined to hormone-responsive cells.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1996

References

REFERENCES

1. Cattanach, Kirk: Nature 1985; 315: 496498.Google Scholar
2. Davies, Hughes: J Med Genet 1993; 30: 101103.Google Scholar