Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T03:54:43.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimization Procedures in Twin Zygosity Diagnosis by Genetic Markers. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Seppo Sarna  and
Jaakko Kaprio
Seppo Sarna*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health Science, University of Helsinki
Jaakko Kaprio
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health Science, University of Helsinki
*
Department of Public Health Science, Haartmaninkatu 3, SF-00290 Helsinki 29, Finland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

More and more genetic markers usable for twin zygosity determination have become available. A relatively small number of markers is sufficient to achieve a satisfactory probability of correctly classifying a twin pair. Previously only the genetic properties of markers have been considered when choosing the markers to be determined. A cost-effectiveness analysis, which considers both genetic properties and relative determination costs of markers, is presented and illustrated with data from the Finnish Twin Registry studies.

Keywords

Twin zygosity diagnosisGenetic markersOptimization proceduresFinnish twin registry
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , April 1979 , pp. 139 - 148
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1979

References

REFERENCES

1.Allen, G (1976): Scope and methodology of twin studies. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma) 25: 79–85.Google Scholar
2.Cederlöf, R, Friberg, L, Jonsson, E, Kaij, L 1961: Studies on similarity diagnosis in twins with the aid of mailed questionnaires. Acta Genet (Basel) 11:338–362.Google Scholar
3.Friedman, GD (1977): A potential pitfall in studying trait-discordant twins. Am J Epidemiol 105: 291–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Juel-Nielsen, N 1958: On the diagnosis of zygosity in twins and the value of blood groups. Acta Genet (Basel) 8:256–273.Google Scholar
5.Sarna, S (1977): “Zygosity Diagnosis in Epidemiological Twin Studies.” Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
6.Sarna, S (In press). Probabilities of concordance of twins with respect to genetic markers. A general formulation. Acta Genet Med Gemellol.Google Scholar
7.Sarna, S, Kaprio, J, Sistonen, P, Koskenvuo, M 1978: Zygosity of twin diagnosis by mailed questionnaire. Hum Hered 28:241–254.Google Scholar
8.Selvin, S 1977: Efficiency of genetic systems for diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 26:81–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed