Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-30T23:36:38.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Primary Amenorrhea with a New Mosaic 46,XXqi/47,XXqi Xp-—Consideration on the X isochromosome formation and X chromosome inactivation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2025

I. Halbrecht*
Affiliation:
B. Gattegno Research Institute of Human Reproduction and Fetal Development, and Institute of Pathology, Hasharon Hospital, Petah-Tiqva, and, Tel-Aviv University Medical School, Israel
F. Shabtai
Affiliation:
B. Gattegno Research Institute of Human Reproduction and Fetal Development, and Institute of Pathology, Hasharon Hospital, Petah-Tiqva, and, Tel-Aviv University Medical School, Israel
C. Kupferstain
Affiliation:
B. Gattegno Research Institute of Human Reproduction and Fetal Development, and Institute of Pathology, Hasharon Hospital, Petah-Tiqva, and, Tel-Aviv University Medical School, Israel
*
Research Institute of Human Reproduction and Fetal Development, Hasharon Hospital, Petah-Tiqva, Israel

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A case of Turner's syndrome was found to be 46,XXqi/47,XXqi Xp-, a new mosaic. The origin of such a mosaic, the formation of the Xq isochromosome using the C-banding technique, and the X chromosome inactivation are discussed. The Xq isochromosome was apparently monocentric, but probably with two strictly close centromeres. The inactivated X seemed to be the Xqi or the normal X alternatively.

Riassunto

RIASSUNTO

In un caso di sindrome di Turner è stato riscontrato un nuovo mosaico: 46,XXqi/47,XXqi Xp-. Vengono discusse l'origine di un tale mosaico, la formazione dell'isocromosoma Xq con la tecnica del Danneggiamento C, e l'inattivazione del cromosoma X. L'isocromosoma Xq era apparentemente monocentrico, ma probabilmente con due centromeri molto vicini. L'X inattivato sembrava essere di volta in volta l'Xqi o l'X normale.

Résumé

RÉSUMÉ

Dans un cas de syndrome de Turner une nouvelle mosaïque a été trouvée: 46,XXqi/47,XXqi Xp-. L'origine de cette mosaïque, la formation de l'isochromosome Xp avec la technique des bandes C, et l'inactivation du chromosome X sont discutées. L'isochromosome Xq était apparemment monocentrique, mais probablement avec deux centromères très près l'un de l'autre. Le X inactivé semblait être parfois le Xqi et parfoi le X normal.

Zusammenfassung

ZUSAMMENFASSUNG

Bei einem Fall von Turner-Syndrom wurde ein neues Mosaik gefunden: 46,XXqi/47,XXqi Xp-. Erörterung des Ursprungs eines solchen Mosaiks, der Bildung des Isochromosoms Xq mit der C-Bandentechnik und der Inaktivierung des Chromosoms X. Das Isochromosom Xq war anscheinend monozentrisch, wahrscheinlich aber mit zwei ganz aneinanderliegenden Zentromeren. Das inaktivierte X schien von Fall zu Fall entweder das Xqi oder das normale X zu sein.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1977

References

REFERENCES

Arrighi, F.E., Hsu, T.C. 1971. Localization of hete-rochromatin in human chromosomes. Cytogenetics, 10: 8186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, M.M., Rosenmann, A., Hacham-Zadeh, S., Dalan, S. 1975. Dicentric X-isochromosome (Xqi die) and pericentric inversion of No. 2 [inv(2) (p15 q21)] in a patient with gonadal dysgenesis. Clin. Genet., 8: 1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comings, D.E. 1968. The rationale for an ordered arrangement of chromatin in the interphase nucleus. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 20: 440460.Google ScholarPubMed
Darlington, C.D. 1939. Misdivision and the genetics of the centromere. J. Genet., 37: 341364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darlington, C.D. 1940. The origin of isochromosomes. J. Genet, 39: 351361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De la Chapelle, A., Schröder, J., Pernu, M. 1972. Isochromosome for the short arm of the X, a human 46,XXpi syndrome. Ann. Hum. Genet., 36: 7987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, P.H., Donald, R.A. 1975. Isochromosome for the short arm of X: A human mosaic 45,X/46,XXpi-. Clin. Genet., 7: 148154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, C.E., Clegg, H.M. 1969. Reciprocal translocations. Brit. Med. Bull., 25: 110114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamerton, J.L. 1971. Human Cytogenetics. Vol. 2: Clinical Cytogenetics (pp. 65–112, 502505). New York-London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jones, H.W. 1965. Clinical significance of anomalies of the sex chromosomes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 93: 335342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kallio, H. 1973. Cytogenetic and clinical study of 100 cases of primary amenorrhoea. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 52 (Suppl. 24): 178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorhead, P.S., Nowell, P.C., Mellman, W.J., Battips, D.M., Hungerford, D.A. 1960. Chromosomes preparations of leukocytes cultured from human peripheral blood. Exp. Cell Res., 20: 613616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muldal, S., Gilbert, C.W., Lajtha, L.G., Lindsten, J., Rowley, J., Fraccaro, M. 1963. Tritiated thymidine incorporation in an isochromosome for the long arm of the X chromosome in man. Lancet, 1: 861863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, S.R.V., Jhanwar, S.C. 1975. Is late replication of the inactive X chromosome irreversible in all cells of mammals? Cytogenet. Cell Genet., 14: 140149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romeo, G., Migeau, B.R. 1975. Stability of X chromosomal inactivation in human somatic cells transformed by S.V. 40. Humangenetik, 29: 165170.Google Scholar
Sarto, G.E. 1974. Cytogenetics of fifty patients with primary amenorrhea. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 119: 1423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmid, W., Naef, E., Mürset, G., Praeder, A. 1974. Cytogenetic findings in 89 cases of Turner's syndrome with abnormal karyotypes. Humangenetik, 24: 93104.Google ScholarPubMed
Seabright, M. 1971. A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet, 2: 971972.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Summitt, R.L., Martens, P.R., Wilroy, R.S. 1974. X-autosome translocation in normal mother and effectively 21-monosomic daughter. J. Pediatr., 84: 539545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Therman, E., Sarto, G.E., Patau, K. 1974. Center for Barr body condensation on the proximal part of the human Xq: A hypothesis. Chromosoma, 44: 361366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed