Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:33:26.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Temperament Prediction for Neonate Twins: Relation to Size for Gestational Age in Same-Sex Pairs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

M.L. Riese
M.L. Riese*
Affiliation:
Child Development Unit, Health Sciences Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
*
Child Development Unit, Health Sciences Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky 40292-0001, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Infants from 22 pairs of appropriate-for-gestational-age/small-for-gestational-age (AGA/SGA) same-sex twins were assessed for temperament stability between the neonatal period and 30 months of age. The evaluation of neonatal temperament included observers' ratings of irritability, resistance to soothing, activity level while awake, activity level during sleep, reactivity, and reinforcement value. At 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months mothers rated their infants' temperament on standardized questionnaires which yielded nine temperament categories: activity level, rhythmicity, approach or withdrawal, adaptability, intensity of reaction, quality of mood, attention span, distractibility, and threshold of responsiveness. The Bayley Scales of Infant Development were administered at 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months to assess mental development. The results of longitudinal correlational analyses indicated that, for the AGA infants, there was a pattern of significant predictive relations between the neonatal ratings of temperament and maternal ratings of temperament at 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months. The SGA infants did not demonstrate similar behavioral stability from the lying-in period up to 30 months of age. Furthermore, for AGA infants there was a consistent trend for both reactivity and neonatal activity during sleep to predict mental development scores between 6 and 30 months. A similar pattern was not observed for the SGA cotwins. The results indicated that temperament stability is an additional area of risk for SGA twins, and that the developmental function of the underlying processes in the neonatal measures is different for AGA and SGA infants.

Keywords

TemperamentDevelopmentSize-for-gestational-ageTwins
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 41 , Issue 2-3 , July 1992 , pp. 123 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1992

References

REFERENCES

1. Allen, MC (1984): Developmental outcome and follow up of the small for gestational age infant. Semin Perinatol 8: 123–156.Google Scholar
2. Als, H, Tronick, E, Adamson, L, Brazelton, TB (1976): The behavior of the full-term yet underweight newborn infant. Dev Med Child Neurol 18: 590–602.Google Scholar
3. Babson, SG, Kangas, J, Young, N, Bramhall, JL (1964): Growth and development of twins of dissimilar size at birth. Pediatrics 33: 327–333.Google Scholar
4. Babson, SG, Phillips, DS (1973): Growth and development of twins dissimilar in size at birth. N Engl J Med 289: 937–940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Barron, AP, Earls, F (1984): The relation of temperament and social factors to behavior problems in three-year-old children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 25: 23–33.Google Scholar
6. Bayley, N (1969): Bayley Scales of Infant Development. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
7. Birns, B, Barten, S, Bridger, WH (1969): Individual differences in temperamental characteristics of infants. Trans NY Acad Sci 31: 1071–1083.Google Scholar
8. Carey, WB (1972): Clinical applications of infant temperament measurements. J Pediatr 81: 823–828.Google Scholar
9. Carey, WB, McDevitt, SC (1978): Stability and change in individual temperament diagnosis from infancy to early childhood. Am Acad Child Psychiatry 17: 331–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Earls, F (1981): Temperament characteristics and behavior problems in three-year-old children. J Nerv Ment Dis 169: 367–373.Google Scholar
11. Frankel, DG, Shapira, R, Arbel, T, Shapira, Y, Ayla, F (1982): The visual attention at 4-months of full-term small-for-gestational-age and full-term appropriate-weight-for-gestational-age infants. In Infant Behavior and Development: Perinatal Risk and Newborn Behavior, Ablex, Norwood, NJ: LP Lipsett & TM Field, pp. 121–129.Google Scholar
12. Fujikura, T, Froehlich, LA (1974): Mental and motor development in monozygotic co-twins with dissimilar birth weights. Pediatrics 53: 884–889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Fullard, W, McDevitt, SC, Carey, WB (1984): Assessing temperament in one- to three-year-old children. J Pediatr Psychol 9: 205–217.Google Scholar
14. Henrichsen, L, Skinhoj, K, Andersen, GE (1986): Delayed growth and reduced intelligence in 9-17 year old intrauterine growth retarded children compared with their monozygous co-twins. Acta Paediatr Scand 75: 31–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Lee, C, Bates, J (1985): Mother-child interaction at age two years and perceived difficult temperament. Child Dev 56: 1314–1326.Google Scholar
16. Lubchenco, LP, Hansman, C, Boyd, E (1966): Intrauterine growth in length and head circumferences as estimated from live births at gestational ages from 26 to 42 weeks. Pediatrics 37: 403–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Matheny, AP Jr, Dolan, AB, Wilson, RS (1976): Twins with academic learning problems: Antecedent characteristics. Am J Orthopsychiatry 46: 464–469.Google Scholar
18. Matheny, AP Jr, Riese, ML, Wilson, RS (1985): Rudiments of infant temperament: Newborn to nine months. Dev Psychol 21: 486–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. McCulloch, K (1988): Neonatal problems in twins. Clin Perinatol 15: 141–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Michaelis, R, Schulte, FJ, Nolte, R (1970): Motor behavior of small for gestational age newborn infants. J Pediatr 76: 208–213.Google Scholar
21. Miyake, K, Chen, S, Campos, JJ (1985): Infant temperament, mother's mode of interaction, and attachment in Japan: An interim report. In Bretherton, I, Waters, E (ed): Growing points of attachment theory and research. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 50 (1-2, Serial No. 209) pp. 276–297.Google Scholar
22. O'Brien, PJ, Hay, DA (1987): Birthweight differences, the transfusion syndrome and the cognitive development of monozygotic twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 36: 181–196.Google Scholar
23. Paine, PA, Pasquali, L (1982): Effects of intrauterine growth and gestational age upon infants' early psychomotor development in Brazil. Percept Mot Skills 55: 871–880.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Palisin, H (1986): Preschool temperament and performance on achievement tests. Dev Psychol 22: 766–770.Google Scholar
25. Parkinson, CE, Wallis, S, Harvey, D (1981): School achievement and behaviour of children who were small-for-dates at birth. Dev Med Child Neurol 23: 41–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Parmelee, AH, Schulte, FJ (1970): Developmental testing of pre-term and small-for-date infants. Pediatrics 45: 21–28.Google Scholar
27. Read, MS, Catz, C, Grave, G, McNellis, D, Warshaw, JB (1984): Introduction: Intrauterine growth retardation - identification of research needs and goals. Semin Perinatol 8: 1.Google Scholar
28. Riese, ML (1982): Procedures and norms for assessing behavioral patterns in full-term and stable pre-term neonates. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 12: 6 (Ms. No. 2415).Google Scholar
29. Riese, ML (1983): Assessment of behavioral patterns in neonates. Infant Behav Dev 6: 241–246.Google Scholar
30. Riese, ML (1987): Temperament stability between the neonatal period and 24 months. Dev Psychol 23: 216–222.Google Scholar
31. Tenovuo, A, Kero, P, Korvenranto, H, Piekkala, R, Sillanpaa, M, Erkkola, R (1988): Developmental outcome of 519 small-for-gestational-age children at the age of two years. Neuropediatrics 19: 41–45.Google Scholar
32. Thomas, A, Chess, S (1977): Temperament and development. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar