Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-30T22:34:06.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Use of Microsatellites in Zygosity Diagnosis of Twins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2016

J. Erdmann*
Affiliation:
Institutes of Human Genetics
M.M. Nöthen
Affiliation:
Institutes of Human Genetics
M. Stratmann
Affiliation:
Institutes of Human Genetics
R. Fimmers
Affiliation:
Medical Statistics, University of Bonn
E. Franzek
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Würzburg, Germany
P. Propping
Affiliation:
Institutes of Human Genetics
*
Institute of Human Genetics, University of Bonn, Wilhelmstr. 31, 5311 Bonn, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Although numerous genetic and anthropological markers are available for determining zygosity of twins, there is still a need for a more practical and informative method in zygosity diagnosis. Dinucleotide repeats or other short repeats (microsatellites) are highly variable between individuals and offer a simple, fast, cheap, and exact approach for zygosity determination. The feasibility of a set of microsatellites to be used for this purpose is demonstrated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1993

References

REFERENCES

1. Akane, A, Matsubara, K, Shiono, H, Yamada, M, Nagakome, Y (1991): Diagnosis of twin zygosity by hypervariable RFLP markers. Am J Med Genet 41: 9698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Hill, AVS, Jeffreys, AJ (1985): Use of minisatellite DNA probes for determination of twin zygosity at birth. Lancet 2: 13941395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Jones, L, Thein, SL, Jeffreys, AJ, Apperley, JF, Catovsky, D, Goldman, JM (1987): Identical twin marrow transplantation for 5 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia: Role of DNA fingerprinting to confirm monozygosity in 3 cases. Eur J Haematol 39: 144147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Krüger, J, Propping, P (1976): Twinning frequencies in Baden-Wiirttemberg according to maternal age and parity from 1955 to 1972. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 25: 3640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Motomura, K, Tateishi, H, Nishisho, I, Okazaki, M, Miki, T, Tonomura, A, Takai, S, Mori, T, Jeffreys, AJ (1987): The zygosity determination of Japanese twins using a minisatellite core probe. Jpn J Hum Genet 32: 914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Selvin, S (1977): Efficiency of genetic systems for diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 26: 8182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Sharma, V, Litt, M (1991): Dinucleotide repeat polymorphism at the D1S117 locus. Nucleic Acids Research 19: 1168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Smith, SM, Penrose, LS (1955): Monozygotic and dizygotic twin diagnosis. Ann Hum Genet 19:273289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Weber, JL, May, PE (1989): Abundant class of human DNA polymorphisms which can be typed using the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Hum Genet 44: 388396.Google ScholarPubMed
10. Weber, JL, May, PE: (1990): Dinucleotide repeat polymorphism at the D4S171 locus. Nucleic Acids Research 18:2202.Google ScholarPubMed
11. Weber, JL, May, PE (1990): Dinucleotide repeat polymorphism at the D9S43 locus. Nucleic Acids Research 18: 2203.Google ScholarPubMed
12. Weber, JL, Kwitek, AE, May, PE (1990): Dinucleotide repeat polymorphisms at the D5S107, D5S108, D5S111, D5S117 and D5S118 loci. Nucleic Acids Research 18: 4035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Weber, JL, Kwitek, AE, May, PE, Patterson, D, Drabkin, H (1990): Dinucleotide repeat polymorphisms at the D8S85, D8S87, and D8S88 loci. Nucleic Acids Research 18: 4038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Weber, JL, May, PE (1990): Dinucleotide repeat polymorphism at the D10S89 locus. Nucleic Acids Research 18: 4637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Yuille, MAR, Hampson, RM, Harris, RM, Affara, NA, Yates, JRW, Ferguson-Smith, MA (1990): CA repeat polymorphism at the ASS locus. Nucleic Acids Research 18: 7472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed