Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T03:24:00.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Within-Pair Differences in Newborn Twins: Effects of Gender and Gestational Age on Behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Marilyn L. Riese
Marilyn L. Riese*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Kentucky
*
Child Development Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Health Sciences Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The behavior of 120 full term and 160 preterm newborn twins was assessed in several key areas: Irritability, soothability, reactivity, reinforcement value, and activity level. Infants were assessed during various situations so that aggregate, or summary, scores representing each behavioral area could be obtained. Evaluations were made during a feeding period, an active sleep period, an awake alert period during which orienting and interactional behaviors were observed, a quiet period during which reactivity to stress was observed, and any fussy periods during which irritability and soothability were assessed. Significant within-twin-pair concordance of behavior was obtained for each of the areas of behavior, suggesting the influence of constitutional variables on neonatal behavior. Analysis of these data by sex resulted in significant within-pair concordance of behavior for same-sex but not for opposite-sex twins. The actual ratings on these behaviors differentiated between full term and preterm infants. Increased behavioral deviance was observed with increasing prematurity in the areas of soothability and activity level. The results are discussed in terms of increased risk factors for preterm twins.

Keywords

Newborn twinsTwin-pair behaviorPreterm twinsTwin behavioral riskSex differences
Type
Twin Development and Temperament
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 33 , Issue 2 , April 1984 , pp. 159 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1984

References

REFERENCES

1.Birns, B (1965. Individual differences in human neonates' responses to stimulation. Child Dev 36:249–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Caputo, DV, Goldstein, KM, Taub, HB (1979): The development of prematurely born children through middle childhood. In Field, TM, Sostek, AM, Goldberg, S, Shuman, HH (eds): Infants Born at Risk: Behavior and Development. New York: Spectrum Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
3.Caputo, DV, Mandell, W (1970. Consequences of low birth weight. Dev Psychol 3:363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Dargassies, SS (1977. Long-term neurological follow-up study of 286 truly premature infants. I: Neurological sequelae. Dev Med Child Neurol 19:462–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.DiVitto, B, Goldberg, S (1979): The effects of newborn medical status on early parent-infant interaction. In Field, TM, Sostek, AM, Goldberg, S, Shuman, HH (eds): Infants Born at Risk: Behavior and Development. New York: Spectrum Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
6.Dreyfus-Brisac, C (1970. Ontogenesis of sleep in human prematures after 32 weeks of conceptional age. Dev Psychobiol 3:91–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Haggard, EA (1958): Intraclass Correlation and the Analysis of Variance. New York: The Dryden Press, Inc.Google Scholar
8.Kurtzberg, D, Vaughan, HG Jr, Daum, C, Greilong, BA, Albin, S, Rotkin, L (1979. Neurobehavioral performance of low-birthweight infants at 40 weeks conceptional age: Comparison with normal full-term infants. Dev Med Child Neurol 21:590–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Lester, BM, Zeskin, PS (1979): The organization and assessment of crying in the infant at risk. In Field, TM, Sostek, AM, Goldberg, S, Shuman, HH (eds.): Infants Born at Risk: Behavior and Development. New York: Spectrum Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
10.Lubchenco, LO (1976): The High Risk Infant. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.Google Scholar
11.Michaelis, R, Parmelee, AH, Stern, E, Haber, A (1973. Activity states in premature and term infants. Dev Psychobiol 6:209–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Riese, ML (1982): Procedures and norms for assessing behavioral patterns in full-term and stable pre-term neonates. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychol 12:6 (Ms. No. 2415).Google Scholar
13.Riese, ML (1983. Assessment of behavioral patterns in neonates. Infant Behav Dev 6:312–316.Google Scholar
14.Riese, ML (1983. Behavioral patterns in full term and preterm twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 32:209–220.Google ScholarPubMed
15.Sostek, AM, Quinn, PO, Davitt, MK (1979): Behavior, development and neurologic status of premature and full-term infants with varying medical complications. In Field, TM, Sostek, AM, Goldberg, S, Shuman, HH (eds.): Infants Born at Risk: Behavior and Development. New York: Spectrum Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
16.Zeskind, PS, Lester, BM (1978. Acoustic features and auditory perceptions of the cries of newborns with prenatal and perinatal complications. Child Dev 49:580–589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed