Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T22:15:17.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Within-pair Similarity in MZ and DZ Twins from Birth to Eighteen Years of Age

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

B. Alin Åkerman*
Affiliation:
Department of Special Education, Stockholm Institute of Education, Stockholm, Sweden
S. Fischbein
Affiliation:
Department of Special Education, Stockholm Institute of Education, Stockholm, Sweden
*
Department of Special Education, Stockholm Institute of Education, Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This study is based on 145 pairs of twins included in a longitudinal study of a cohort of singletons born in 1953 and living in the Stockholm metropolitan area in 1963. Of these 145 pairs, 28 were classified as MZ, 103 as DZ and 14 pairs could not be classified. School achievement and ability test results have been collected for this group as well as data for the boys from physical and mental examinations on enrollment to military service. The purpose of this study was to compare within-pair similarity for MZ and DZ twins from birth onwards. There seems to be a divergent trend over time for MZ twin pairs to become more similar and DZ twin pairs to become less similar in height growth, school achievement and verbal ability. This is in accordance with previous research in this field. In relating similarity within pairs to birthweight, we found a drop in within-pair similarity for low birthweight MZ and DZ twin pairs (both twins ≤2.500 g), but not for normal weight twin pairs. A discussion is initiated concerning methodological implications of these results.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1992

References

REFERENCES

1. Alin Åkerman, B, Fischbein, S (1991): Twins: Are they at risk? A longitudinal study of twins from birth to 18 years of age. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 40: 2940.Google Scholar
2. Alin Åkerman, B, Thomassen, PA (1991): Four-year follow-up of locomotor and language development in 34 twin pairs. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 40:2127.Google Scholar
3. Alin Åkerman, B (1991): They are Two!! Parents' expectations of twins and a longitudinal study of mental development in 34 twin pairs. (In Swedish with an English abstract). Stockolm: Almqvist and Wiksell Int.Google Scholar
4. Bergman, P (1988): Materialy Prace Antropologiczne. Wroclaw: Polska Akademia Nauk. Zaklad Antropologii.Google Scholar
5. Bryan, E (1983): The Nature and Nurture of Twins. London: Baillière Tindall.Google Scholar
6. Fischbein, S (1969): Heredity-Environment Influence on Growth and Development during Adolescence. Lund: Liber.Google Scholar
7. Fischbein, S (1977): Intra-pair similarity in physical growth of monozygotic and dizygotic twins during puberty. Ann Hum Biol 4,5:417430.Google Scholar
8. Fischbein, S (1979) Heredity-Environment Influences on Growth and Development during Puberty. Lund: Liber.Google Scholar
9. Janson, C-G (1984): Project Metropolitan. A presentation and progress report. Research report no. 21. Department of Sociology, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
10. Ljung, B-O (1966): Intra-class correlation. A program for ADB. (in Swedish). Report no. 16. Department of Educational Research, School of Education, Stockholm.Google Scholar
11. Sharma, JC (1983): The genetic contribution to pubertal growth and development studies by longitudinal growth data on twins. Ann Hum Biol 10,2:163171.Google Scholar
12. Scheinfeld, A (1973): Twins and Supertwins. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
13. Wilson, RS, Harpring, EB (1972): Mental and motor development in infant twins. Dev Psychol 7,3:277287.Google Scholar
14. Wilson, RS (1975): Twins: Patterns of cognitive development as measured on the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. Dev Psychol 11,2:126134.Google Scholar
15. Wilson, RS (1977): Twins and Siblings: Concordance for school-age mental development. Child Dev 48:211216.Google Scholar
16. Wilson, RS (1979): Twin growth: Initial deficit, recovery and trends in concordance from birth to nine years. Ann Hum Biol 6:205220.Google Scholar
17. Wilson, RS (1983): The Louisville Twin Study: Developmental synchronies in behavior. Child Dev 54:298316.Google Scholar
18. Wilson, RS (1984): Twins: Genetic influence on growth and maturation. Proc Olympic Sci Congr.Google Scholar