Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:44:50.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Bronze Age-Iron Age transition in northeast Anatolia: a view from Sos Höyük

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Antonio Sagona
Antonio Sagona
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The ancient settlement of Sos Höyük, situated east of Erzurum, is providing a significant stratigraphic sequence of human occupation from the Late Chalcolithic to the Medieval period. This sequence includes the transition from the end of the Bronze Age into the first centuries of the Iron Age, a period which is surrounded by difficult but intriguing historical questions. At the mound of Sos Höyük evidence for this transition is starting to emerge from a relatively small operation on the northern slope, midway down the mound, in trenches M15 and L16.

The stratigraphic record at Sos Höyük together with a large range of radiocarbon readings taken from samples collected over four seasons of excavation indicate that the site was occupied throughout the late fourth/third millennium BC and intermittently in the second millennium. The earliest centuries of the second millennium BC are best defined by storage pits, wattle and daub dwellings and burials that conform generally to a tradition initially documented by Kuftin in his excavations of the Trialeti kurgan burials near Tbilisi, Georgia (Kuftin 1941; Miron, Orthmann 1995: 79–94).

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 49 , December 1999 , pp. 153 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kroll, S 1976: Keramik urartäischer Festungen in Iran: Ein Beitrag zur Expansion Urartus in Iranisch-Azarbaidjan (Mitteilungen aus Iran, Ergänzungsband 2). BerlinGoogle Scholar
Kuftin, B A 1941: Arkheologicheskie Raskopki v Trialeti I: Oput Periodizatsii Pamiatnikov. TbilisiGoogle Scholar
Miron, A, Orthmann, W (eds) 1995: Unterwegs zum Goldenen Vlies: Archäologische Funde aus Georgien. SaarbrückenGoogle Scholar
Ökse, T 1988: Mitteleisenzeitliche Keramik Zentral-Ostanatoliens (Berliner Beiträge zum Vorderen Orient Band 9). BerlinGoogle Scholar
Russell, H F 1980: Pre-Classical Pottery of Eastern Anatolia (British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara Monograph 2, British Archaeological Reports International Series 85). OxfordGoogle Scholar
Sagona, A, Pemberton, E, McPhee, I 1992: ‘Excavations at Büyüktepe, 1991: second preliminary report’ Anatolian Studies 42: 29–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagona, A G, Sagona, C, Özkorucuklu, H 1995: ‘Excavations at Sos Höyük 1994: first preliminary report’ Anatolian Studies 45: 193–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagona, A G, Erkmen, M, Sagona, C, Thomas, I 1996: ‘Excavations at Sos Höyük 1995: second preliminary report’ Anatolian Studies 46: 27–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagona, A G, Erkmen, M, Sagona, C, Howells, S 1997: ‘Excavations at Sos Höyük 1996: third preliminary report’ Anatolica 23: 181–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagona, A, Erkmen, M, Sagona, C, McNiven, I, Howells, S 1998: ‘Excavations at Sos Höyük, 1997: fourth preliminary report’ Anatolica 24: 31–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von der Osten, H H 1952: ‘Die urartäische Töpferei aus Van und die Möglichkeiten ihrer Einordnung in die Anatolische Keramik I’ Orientalia 21: 307–28Google Scholar