Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:05:42.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Die eisenzeitliche Stratigraphie von Lidar Höyük

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Uwe Müller
Uwe Müller
Affiliation:
Deutsches Archäologisches Institut Abt.Istanbul
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Lidar Höyük was situated on the east bank of the Euphrates river, about 50km northwest of the provincial capital Şanlıurfa and within sight of the mound of Samsat on the opposite bank. Since 1988 these sites have been flooded by the waters of the Atatürk Dam Basin. Excavations at Lidar Höyük took place in the years from 1979 to 1987. They were conducted by the Institute für Ur- und Frühgeschichte und Vorderasiatische Archäologie of the University of Heidelberg under the direction of Hauptmann. The occupation levels reached from the Islamic down to the Chalcolithic Period. Iron Age structures were found mainly in a large trench called Q, R, S 44-45, where an unbroken stratigraphy from the 13th to the sixth century BC could be excavated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Anatolian Studies , Volume 49 , December 1999 , pp. 123 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliographie

Bartl, K 1988: Norşun-Tepe. Die Frühe Eisenzeit. Berlin: DissertationGoogle Scholar
Bilgi, Ö 1991: ‘Iron Age pottery from Köşkerbaba Höyük’ in Çilingiroǧlu, A, French, D H (eds), Anatolian Iron Ages 2 (British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara Monograph 13). London: 11–28Google Scholar
Duru, R 1979a: ‘Deǧirmentepe Höyük Excavation, 1973. Keban Projesi 1973 Çalışmaları’ Orta Doǧu Teknik Üniversitesi Keban Projesi Yayınları (Seri I, No 6). Ankara: 19–24Google Scholar
Duru, R 1979b: ‘Keban Project Deǧirmentepe Excavations 1973’ Orta Doǧu Teknik Üniversitesi Keban Projesi Yayınları (Seri I, No 6). AnkaraGoogle Scholar
Esin, U 1970–1982: ‘Vorberichte zu der Ausgrabung Tepecik’ Orta Doǧu Teknik Üniversitesi Keban Projesi Yayınları (Seri I, No 1) Ankara 1970: 159–72; (No 2) Ankara 1971: 119–29; (No 3) Ankara 1972: 149–58; (No 4) Ankara 1974: 123–35; (No 5) Ankara 1976: 109–17; (No 6) Ankara 1979: 97–114; (No 7) Ankara 1982: 95–118Google Scholar
Esin, U 1981: ‘Vorberichte zu der Ausgrabung Tepecik’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 2 1980. Ankara: 91–9Google Scholar
Esin, U 1982: ‘Vorberichte zu der Ausgrabung Tepecik’ Kazı Sonuçları Toplantısı 3 1981. Ankara: 39–41Google Scholar
Gitin, S 1990: Gezer III. A Ceramic Typology of the Late Iron II, Persian and Hellenistic Periods at Tell Gezer (Annual of the Nelson Glueck School of Biblical Archeology Vol III). JerusalemGoogle Scholar
Goldman, H, Hanfmann, G M A, Porada, E 1963: Excavations at Gözlü Kule, Tarsus: The Iron Age. Vol III: plates. PrincetonGoogle Scholar
Littauer, M A, Couwel, J H, Hauptmann, H 1991: ‘Ein spätbronzezeitliches Speichenrad vom Lidar Höyük in der Südost-Türkei’ Archäologischer Anzeiger 1991: 349–58Google Scholar
Hauptmann, H 1970: ‘Norşun-Tepe Historische Geographie und Ergebnisse der Grabungen 1968/69’ Istanbuler Mitteilungen 19/20: 21–78Google Scholar
Hauptmann, H 1971: ‘Die Grabungen auf dem Norşun-Tepe, 1969. Keban Projesi 1969 Çalışmaları’ Orta Doǧu Teknik Üniversitesi Keban Projesi Yayınları (Seri I, No 2). Ankara: 81–90Google Scholar
Hawkins, J D 1988: ‘Kuzi-Tešub and the “Great Kings” of Karkamiš” Anatolian Studies 38: 99–108Google Scholar
Kroll, S 1970: ‘Keramik der Ausgrabung Bastam 1969’ Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran 3: 67–92Google Scholar
Mikami, T, Omura, S 1992: ‘A preliminary report on the second excavation at Kaman-Kalehöyük in Turkey (1987)’ Bulletin of the Middle Eastern Culture Centre in Japan 6: 23–59Google Scholar
Moorey, P R S 1980: Cemeteries in the 1 st Millenium BC at Deve Höyük near Carcamish, salvaged by T E Lawrence and L Woolley in 1913 (British Archaeological Reports International Series 87). OxfordGoogle Scholar
Oates, J 1959: ‘Late Assyrian pottery from Fort Shalmaneser’ Iraq 21: 130–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Şenyurt, S, 1995: ‘Late Assyrian pottery from Girnavaz’ in Erkanal, A et al. (eds), Studien über alte Vorderasiatische Kulturen. In Memoriam I Metin Akyurt & Bahattin Devam. Istanbul: 327–39Google Scholar
Sürenhagen, D 1986: ‘Ein Königssiegel aus Kargamiš’ Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orientgesellschaft 118: 183–90Google Scholar
Van Loon, M, Güterbock, H G 1971–1972: ‘Vorberichte zu der Ausgrabung Korucutepe. Keban Projesi 1969 Çalışmaları’ Orta Doǧu Teknik Üniversitesi Keban Projesi Yayınları (Seri I, No 2). Ankara 1971: 59–69; (No 3) Ankara 1972: 83–5Google Scholar
Winn, M M 1980: ‘The Early Iron Age Pottery in Korucutepe 3’ in van Loon, M N (ed), Final Report on the Excavation of the Universities of Chicago, California (LA) and Amsterdam in the Keban Reservoir, Eastern Anatolia 1968–1970. Amsterdam & New York: 155–75Google Scholar