Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:56:28.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New Insights in Balkan–Anatolian Connections in the Late Chalcolithic: Old Evidence from the Turkish Black Sea Littoral1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2013

Laurens Thissen
Affiliation:
University of Leiden

Extract

The Northern Anatolian region under consideration here, the Bafra plain with its main site of Ikiztepe, and the Samsun area with Dündartepe, should be seen as a contact zone between Central Anatolia, the Balkans and the Eastern Aegean. Several items of material culture from Northern Anatolia can be linked with Southeast Europe, the islands off the coast of Western Turkey and Central Anatolia. These connections were established at least by the end of the fifth millennium B.C. Strong similarities in pottery and metal finds from North and Central Anatolian sites with the Cernavoda cultures in Romania indicate that close linkage did in fact continue into the third millennium B.C., thus giving proof of a long tradition. Here, only a small segment of this huge time-span, viz., the last quarter of the fourth millennium, equated with the last stretch of the Late Chalcolithic period, is my concern.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute at Ankara 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alkım, U. B., Alkım, H. and Bilgi, Ö. 1988 Ikiztepe I. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.Google Scholar
Bakalakis, G. and Sakellariou, A. 1981 Paradimi. Mainz am Rhein: Phillip von Zabern.Google Scholar
Çambel, H. 1947Archäologischer Bericht über Anatolien.” Orientalia N.S. 16:263270.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. 1981 The Vinča culture of South-East Europe. Studies in chronology, economy and society. Oxford: BAR International Series 117.Google Scholar
Eggert, M. and Lüth, F. 1987Mersin und die absolute Chronologie des europäischen Neolithikums.” Germania 65:1728.Google Scholar
Evans, J. and Renfrew, C. 1968 Excavations at Saliagos near Antiparos. London: The British School of Archaeology at Athens.Google Scholar
Felsch, R. 1987 Das Kastro Tigani. Die spätneolithische und chalcolithische Siedlung. Samos II. Bonn: Phillip von Zabern.Google Scholar
Fol, A., Katinčarov, R., Lichardus, J., Bertemes, F. and Iliev, I. Krǎstev 1989Bericht über die bulgarisch-deutschen Ausgrabungen in Drama (1983–1988). Neolithikum-Kupferzeit-Bronzezeit.” Bericht der Römisch-Germanischen Kommission 70:5127.Google Scholar
Frey, O.-H. 1991 “Varna—ein Umschlagplatz für den Seehandel in der Kupferzeit?” In: Lichardus, J. [ed.]. Die Kupferzeit als historische Epoche; Symposium Saarbrücken und Otzenhausen 6–13.11.1988. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt: 195201.Google Scholar
Furness, A. 1956Some early pottery of Samos, Kalimnos and Chios.” Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 22:173212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimbutas, M. [ed.] 1976 Neolithic Macedonia. As reflected by excavation at Anza, Southeast Yugoslavia. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
Hauptmann, H. and Milojčić, V. 1969 Die Funde der frühen Dimini-Zeit aus der Arapi-Magula, Thessalien. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt.Google Scholar
Hiller, S. 1990 “Neue Ausgrabungen in Karanovo.” In Srejović, D. and Tasić, N. [eds.] Vinča and its world. International symposium—The Danubian region from 6000 to 3000 B.C. Belgrade, Smederevska Palanka, October 1988. Belgrade: 197206.Google Scholar
Hood, S. 1981 Excavations in Chios 1938–1955. Prehistoric Emporio and Ayio Gala. London: The British School of Archaeology at Athens/Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Ivanov, I. 1988 “Die Ausgrabungen des Gräberfeldes von Varna (1972–1986).” In Fol, A. and Lichardus, J. [eds.] Macht, Herrschaft und Gold. Das Gräberfeld von Varna (Bulgarien) und die Anfänge einer neuen europäischen Zivilisation. Saarbrücken: Moderne Galerie des Saarland-Museums: 4966.Google Scholar
Kâmil, T. 1982 Yortan cemetery in the Early Bronze Age of Western Anatolia. Oxford: BAR International Series 145.Google Scholar
Kǎnčev, M. 1973Kulturnata grupa Karanovo IV v Novozagorsko.” Archeologija Sofia 15/3:4251Google Scholar
Koşay, H. 1951 Les fouilles d'Alaca Höyük, 1937–1939. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.Google Scholar
Koşay, H. and Akok, M. 1957 Ausgrabungen von Büyük Güllücek, 1947 und 1949. Ankara: Türk Tarih KurumuGoogle Scholar
Koşay, H. and Akok, M. 1966 Ausgrabungen von Alaca Höyük. Vorbericht über die Forschungen und Entdeckungen von 1940–1948. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.Google Scholar
Kökten, K., Özgüç, N. and Özgüç, T. 19451940 ve 1941 yılında Türk Tarih Kurumu adına yapılan Samsun bölgesi kazıları hakkında ilk kısa rapor.” Belleten IX:361400.Google Scholar
Lamb, W. 1949New developments in early Anatolian archaeology.” Iraq XI:188201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichardus, J. 1988 “Der westpontische Raum und die Anfänge der kupferzeitlichen Zivilisation.” In Fol, A. and Lichardus, J. [eds.]. Macht, Herrschaft und Gold. Das Gräberfeld von Varna (Bulgarien) und die Anfänge einer neuen europäischen Zivilisation. Saarbrücken: Moderne Galerie des Saarland–Museums: 79130.Google Scholar
Lichardus, J. 1991 “Das Gräberfeld von Varna im Rahmen des Totenrituals des Kodzadermen-Gumelniṭa-Karanovo Vl-Verbandes.” In: Lichardus, J. [ed.]. Die Kupferzeit als historische Epoche; Symposium Saarbrücken und Otzenhausen 6.–13.11.1988. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt: 167194.Google Scholar
Lichardus, J. and Lichardus-Itten, M. et al. 1985 La protohistoire de l'Europe. Le néolithique et le chalcolithique entre la Méditerranée et la mer Baltique. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. and Mellaart, J. 1962 Beycesultan. Vol. I. The Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age levels. London: The British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.Google Scholar
Makkay, J. 1976Problems concerning Copper Age chronology in the Carpathian Basin.” Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 28:251300.Google Scholar
Makkay, J. 1985Diffusionism, antidiffusionism and chronology: some general remarks.” Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 37:312.Google Scholar
Malinowski, B. 1922 Argonauts of the Western Pacific. An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. London/New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul [1978 paperback edition used].Google Scholar
Mellaart, J. 1963Early cultures of the South Anatolian plateau, II. The Late Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Ages in the Konya Plain.” Anatolian Studies 13:199236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morintz, S. and Roman, P. 1968Aspekte des Ausgangs des Äneolithikums und der Übergangsstufe zur Bronzezeit im Raum der Nieder-Donau.” Dacia XII:45128.Google Scholar
Orthmann, W. 1963 Die Keramik der frühen Bronzezeit aus Inneranatolien. Berlin:Gebr. Mann.Google Scholar
Orthmann, W. 1966Keramik der Yortankultur in den Berliner Museen.” Istanbuler Mitteilungen 16:126.Google Scholar
Osten, H. H. von der 1937 The Alishar Hüyük. seasons of 1930–1932. Part 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press [OIP 28].Google Scholar
Özdoğan, M. 1991 “Eastern Thrace before the beginning of Troy I. An archaeological dilemma.” In: Lichardus, J. [ed.] Die Kupferzeit als historische Epoche; Symposium Saarbrücken und Otzenhausen 6.–13.11.1988. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt: 217225.Google Scholar
Özdoğan, M. 1991 in press “Pre-bronze age sequence of Central Anatolia: an alternative approach.” [To appear in the Beran Festschrift].Google Scholar
Özdoğan, M., Miyake, Y and Dede, N. Özbaşaran 1991An interim report on excavations at Yarımburgaz and Toptepe in Eastern Thrace.” Anatolica XVII:59121.Google Scholar
Özgüç, T. 1948 “Samsun hafriyatinin 1941–1942 yılı neticeleri.” In: III. Türk Tarih Kongresi, Ankara 1943. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu: 393419.Google Scholar
Özgüç, T. and Akok, M. 1957Objects from Horoztepe.” Belleten XXI:211219.Google Scholar
Radunčeva, A. 1976 Vinica. Eneolitno selišče i nekropol. Sofia.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1987 Archaeology and language. The puzzle of Indo-European origins. [1989 Penguin edition used].Google Scholar
Renfrew, C., Gimbutas, M. and Elster, E. 1986 Excavations at Sitagroi I. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
Roman, P. 1971Strukturänderungen des Endäneolithikums im Donau-Karpaten-Raum.” Dacia XV:31169.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. 1972 Stone age economics. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
Sampson, A. 1987 E neolithikè periodos sta Dodekanèsa. Athens:Tameio Archaiologikon poron kai Apallotrioseon.Google Scholar
Seeher, J. 1987 Demircihüyük. Die Keramik I. Mainz am Rhein: Phillip von Zabern.Google Scholar
Tezcan, B. 1958Aksaray çevresinden derlenen eserler.” Belleten XXII:517526.Google Scholar
Temizer, R. 1960 “Yazır Höyügü Buluntuları.” In: V. Türk Tarih Kongresi, Ankara 1956. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu: 156164.Google Scholar
Todorova, H. 1978 The eneolithic period in Bulgaria in the fifth millennium B.C. Oxford:BAR International Series 49.Google Scholar
Todorova, H. and Tonceva, G. 1975Die äneolithische Pfahlbausiedlung bei Ezerovo im Varnasee.” Germania 53:3046.Google Scholar
Todorova, H., Ivanov, S., Vasilev, V., Hopf, M., Quitta, H. and Kohl, G. 1975 Seliščnata mogila pri Goljamo Delčevo. Sofia.Google Scholar
Yakar, J. 1985 The later prehistory of Anatolia: the Late Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age. Oxford: BAR International Series 268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar