Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:25:50.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cultural assimilation in the Anglo-Saxon royal genealogies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

Craig R. Davis
Craig R. Davis
Affiliation:
Smith College, Massachusetts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

After the conversion of the various Anglo-Saxon royal houses to Christianity in the seventh century, the mythology of the late pagan cults which had supported their sovereignty was supplanted, but not utterly destroyed, by the sacred history of the Bible. Myths in which the old gods sired the founders of current dynasties proved uniquely adaptive. These foundation myths were preserved at a secondary stratum in the new ideological order, in that body of dynastic pseudo-history and heroic legend which was important but subordinate to the authoritative canon of Christian scripture. As J. M. Wallace-Hadrill suggested, the nascent Anglo-Saxon dynasties needed legitimizing ancestors as much after, as before, their conversion. And if they could no longer have gods, they would settle for men of the same name.

Type
Research Article
Information
Anglo-Saxon England , Volume 21 , December 1992 , pp. 23 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Early Germanic Kingship in England and on the Continent (Oxford, 1971), p. 45.Google Scholar I wish to thank Richard J. Parmentier and Joseph Harris for help with this article.

2 Cyfranc Lludd a Llefelys, ed. Roberts, B.F. (Oxford, 1975), p. xii.Google Scholar

3 Edda: Prologue and Gylfaginning, ed. Faulkes, A. (Oxford, 1982), p. 6Google Scholar; trans. Faulkes, A., Edda (London, 1987), p. 4.Google Scholar

4 Getica, ed. Mommsen, T., MGH, Auct. Antiq. 5.1 (Berlin, 1982), 76, line 16.Google Scholar

5 ‘Donot waste time wrangling with them about the ancestry of their gods, however false these are; but grant them their own view that some gods were born to others through the intercourse of male and female so that you can at least prove that gods and goddesses born in the manner of men are in fact men, not gods at all, and, since they did not exist before, must have had a beginning.’ Die Britfe desheiligen Bonifatius und Lullus, ed. Tangl, M. (Berlin, 1916), p. 39 (no. 23)Google Scholar; trans. Emerton, E., The Letters of Saint Boniface (New York, 1940), p. 48.Google Scholar

6 K. Hauck discusses the tracing of royal descent from pagan gods even after the conversion to Christianity among a number of Germanic peoples, including the Anglo-Saxons, in ‘Lebensnormen und Kultmythen in germanischen Stammesund Herrschergenealogien’, Saeculum 6 (1955), 186–223Google Scholar; see also his ‘Die geschichtliche Bedeutung der germanischen Auffassung von Königtum und Ade’, Congres international des sciences historiques 11 (1960), 96–20Google Scholar, his ‘Carmina antiqua: Abstammungsglaube und Stammesbewusstsein’, Zeitschrift fur bayerische Landesgeschichte 27 (1964), 1–33Google Scholar, and Hofler, O., ‘Abstammungstraditionen’, Reallexikon der germanischen Alterumskunde, ed. Hoops, J., 2nd ed., ed. H. Beck et al.9 (Berlin, 1973) 1, 18–29.Google ScholarR. Wenskus has demonstrated the political importance of myths of a common national ancestor from which a royal clan explicitly traced its descent in Stammesbildung und Virfassung: Das Werden der frühmittelalterlichen Gentes (Cologne and Graz, 1961).Google Scholar On the formation of genealogies in general in the medieval west, see Genicot, L., Les Génealogies, Typologie des Sources du Moyen Age Occidental 15 (Turnhout, 1985).Google Scholar

7 Ryan, J.S., ‘Othin in England: Evidence from the Poetry for a Cult of Woden in Anglo-Saxon England’, Folklore 74 (1963), 460–80, at 462CrossRefGoogle Scholar; cf. Yorke, B., Kings and Kingdoms of Early Anglo-Saxon England (London, 1990), pp. 15–16.Google Scholar

8 ‘Anglo-Saxon Royal Genealogies’, PBA 39 (1953), 287–348.Google Scholar

9 ‘Kingship, Genealogies and Regnal Lists’, Early Medieval Kingship, ed. Sawyer, P.H. and Wood, I.N. (Leeds, 1977), pp. 72–104.Google Scholar Dumville has edited the eighth-century Anglian collection of genealogical lore in ‘The Anglian Collection of Royal Genealogies and Regnal Lists’, ASE 5 (1976), 23–50Google Scholar, and the late ninth-century Alfredian genealogy of the West Saxon kings to Cerdic in ‘The West Saxon Genealogical Regnal List: Manuscripts and Texts’, Anglia 104 (1986), 1–32.Google Scholar For a discussion of the latter, see Dumville, , ‘The West Saxon Genealogical Regnal List and the Chronology of Early Wessex’, Peritia 4 (1985), 21–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar The ‘Harleian’ recension of the Historia Brittonum is considered by many editors to represent most closely the early ninth-century text of that work, which includes a number of pedigrees, chs. 57–61; for a text, see Nennii Historia Brittonum, ed. Stevenson, J. (London, 1838)Google Scholar, and see further The ‘Historia Brittonum’, 3: The ‘Vatican’ Recension, ed. Dumville, D.N. (Cambridge, 1985).Google Scholar For other fragments and versions of these king lists, see Bede's, Historia ecclesiasticagentis Anglorum [hereafter HE] 1.15 and 11.5Google Scholar (Bede's Ecclesiastical History of the English People, ed. Colgrave, B. and Mynors, R.A.B. (Oxford, 1969), pp. 50 and 150)Google Scholar; Blair, P. Hunter, ‘The Moore Memoranda on Northumbrian History’, in The Early Cultures of North-West Europe, ed. Fox, C. and Dickins, B. (Cambridge, 1950), pp. 245–57Google Scholar; Asser, Vita Ælfrediregis, ch. 1 (Asser's Life of King Alfred, ed. Stevenson, W.H. (Oxford, 1904), pp. 1–4)Google Scholar; Anglo-Saxon Chronicle [hereafter [ASC] 855 (The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle: a Revised Translation, ed. Whitelock, D. et al. (London, 1961, rev. 1965), p. 44)Google Scholar; and The Chronicle of Ætbelweard, ed. Campbell, A. (London, 1962), pp. 9, 18, and 33.Google Scholar

10 The Chronicle of Æthelweard, ed. Campbell, , p. 9; and cf. ‘rex multarum gentium, quern pagani nunc ut deum colunt aliqui’, p. 18.Google Scholar Cf. also Hunter, M., ‘Germanic and Roman Antiquity and the Sense of the Past in Anglo-Saxon England’, ASE 3 (1974), 29–50, at 34.Google Scholar

11 ‘Bede's Use of Gildas’, EHR 90 (1975), 241–61, at 254, n. 1.Google Scholar

12 Dumville, , ‘Kingship, Genealogies and Regnal Lists’, p. 79.Google Scholar

13 See Beowulf and the Fight at Finnsburg, ed. Klaeber, F., 3rd ed. (Boston, MA, 1950), lines 175–83Google Scholar; for a patristic example, see Sancti Aurelii Augustini Episcopide Civitate Dei, ed. Dombart, B. and Kalb, A., 2 vols., CCSL 47–8 (Turnhout, 1955) I, 294–6 (X.21–2).Google Scholar

14 Cf. Harrison, K., ‘Woden’, in Famulus Cbristi: Essays in Commemoration of the Thirteenth Centenary of the Birth of the Venerable Bede, ed. Bonner, G. (London, 1976), pp. 351–6.Google Scholar

15 For an edition of the East Saxon royal genealogy, see Dumville, , ‘The West Saxon Genealogical Regnal List’, pp. 31–2Google Scholar; see also The Oldest English Texts, ed. Sweet, H., EETS os 83 (London, 1885), 179.Google Scholar

16 In Althochdeutsches Lesebucb, ed. Braune, W., 15th ed., rev. Ebbinghaus, E.A. (Tübingen, 1969), p. 39Google Scholar; cf. Hodgkin, R.H., who includes the text of the OS Abrenuntiatio Diaboli in A History of the Anglo-Saxons, 3rd ed., 2 vols. (London, 1952) I, 302.Google Scholar See also Petre, E.O.G. Turville, Myth and Religion of the North: the Religion of Ancient Scandinavia (London, 1964), p. 100.Google Scholar

17 ‘Royal Genealogies’, pp. 302–5.Google Scholar

18 Dumville, , ‘Kingship, Genealogies and Regnal Lists’, p. 78.Google Scholar

19 HE 1.15 and II.5.

20 Germania, ch. 7, in Cornelii Taciti Opera Minora, ed. Winterbottom, M. and Ogilvie, R.M. (Oxford, 1975), p. 41.Google Scholar

21 Todd, M., The Northern Barbarians 100 B.C.-A.D. 300 (London, 1975), p. 194.Google Scholar

22 Among his many other appellations, Óðinn is called Jálq or jákr ‘gelding’ in Snorri's Edda, ed. Faulkes, P., 8, line 32, and p. 22, line 11Google Scholar; see Turville-Petre, , Myth and Religion of the North, pp. 56–7.Google Scholar

23 ‘The Settlement of England in Bede and the Chronicle’, ASE 12 (1983), 1–41, at 22–3Google Scholar; cf. Brooks, N., ‘The Creation and Early Structure of the Kingdom of Kent’, in The Origins of the Anglo-Saxon Kingdoms, ed. Bassett, S. (Leicester, 1989), pp. 55–74, at 58–60Google Scholar, and Kirby, D.P., The Earliest English Kings (London, 1991), p. 15.Google Scholar

24 Ed. Mommsen, , p. 76, line 13.Google Scholar

25 Gelling, M., ‘Further Thoughts on Pagan Place-Names’, Place-Name Evidence for the Anglo- Saxon Invasion and Scandinavian Settlements, ed. Cameron, K. (Nottingham, 1975), pp. 99–114, at 105Google Scholar; cf. Turville-Petre, J., ‘Hengest and Horsa’, SBVS 14 (1956–1957), 273–90.Google Scholar

26 Mayr-Harting, H., The Coming of Christianity to Anglo-Saxon England, 3rd ed. (London, 1991), p. 17.Google Scholar

27 ‘Celtic and Anglo-Saxon Kingship: some Further Thoughts’, in Sources of Anglo-Saxon Culture, ed. Szarmach, P.E. (Kalamazoo, MI, 1986), pp. 151–83, at 160.Google Scholar

28 ‘Kingship, Genealogies and Regnal Lists’, p. 72.Google Scholar

29 Ibid. pp. 77–80 and 85–96, and Hill, T.D., ‘The Myth of the Ark-Born Son of Noe and the West-Saxon Royal Genealogical Tables’, Harvard Theol. Rev. 80 (1987), 379–83, at 380.Google Scholar

30 Sisam, , ‘Royal Genealogies’, pp. 307–14.Google ScholarCf. B. Blount's remark that Luo genealogies were created ‘in competition, cooperation, and occasionally by fiat within a framework of Luo social interaction’, in ‘Agreeing to Agree on Genealogy: a Luo Sociology of Knowledge’, in Sociocultural Dimensions of Language Use, ed. Sanches, M. and Blount, B. (New York, 1975), pp. 117–36, at 118Google Scholar; quoted by Irvine, J.T., ‘When is Genealogy History? Wolof Genealogies in Comparative Perspective’, Amer. Ethnologist 5 (1978), 651–74, at 652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

31 In London, British Library, Cotton Vespasian B.vi, fol. 109, ptd Dumville, , ‘Anglia n Collection’, pp. 30–1.Google Scholar

32 Turville-Petre, , Myth and Religion, p. 26.Google Scholar

33 Also in BL, Cotton Vespasian B.vi.

34 Edda, ed. Faulkes, , p. 22, line 15Google Scholar; trans. Faulkes, , p. 22.Google ScholarCf. Kuhn, H., ‘Gaut’, Festschriftfürjost Trier, ed. von Wiese, B. and Borck, K.H. (Meisenheim, 1954), pp. 417–33Google Scholar; Birkhan, H., ‘Gapt und Gaut’, ZDA 94 (1965), 1–17Google Scholar; and Moisl, H., ‘Anglo-Saxon Royal Genealogies and Germanic Oral Tradition’, JMH 7 (1981), 215–48, at 219–23.Google Scholar

35 Wilson, D.M., The Vikings and their Origins (London, 1970), p. 14.Google Scholar

36 Chambers, R.W., Beowulf an Introduction to the Study of the Poem with a Discussion of the Stories of Offa and Finn, 3rd ed. with a supplement by Wrenn, C.L. (Cambridge, 1959), p. 320Google Scholar; Sisam, , ‘Royal Genealogies’, pp. 308–21.Google Scholar

37 Asser, , Vita Ælfredi regis, chs. 22–3.Google Scholar

38 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, ed. Whitelock, et al. , p. 44.Google Scholar Cf. Chambers, , Beowulf, pp. 80 and 311–22.Google Scholar See also Hill, , ‘Myth of the Ark-Born Son of Noe’, pp. 379–83.Google Scholar

39 Ed. Campbell, , p. 33Google Scholar; cf. Chadwick, H.M., The Origin of the English Nation (Cambridge, 1907), p. 274.Google Scholar

40 The full reading is: ‘Adam, primus homo et pater noster id est Christus.’

41 Luke 111.38: ‘Adam, qui fuit [filius] Dei.’ Magoun, F.P. Jr, in ‘King Æthelwulf's Biblical Ancestors’, MLR 46 (1951), 249–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar, demonstrated that the West Saxon genealogist almost certainly took the names of Noah's ancestors not from Gen. V, as E. Hackenberg had argued in Die Stammtafeln der angelsächsischen Kõnigreicbe (Berlin, 1918)Google Scholar, but from the genealogy of Christ in Luke III.36–8.

42 Cf. Dumville, , ‘Kingship, Genealogies and Regnal Lists’, p. 95.Google Scholar

43 ‘Myth of the Ark-Born Son of Noe’, p. 383.Google Scholar

44 On the biblical dimensions of West Saxon kingship, cf. Keynes, S., ‘A Tale of Two Kings: Alfred the Great and jEthelred the Unready’, TRHS 5th ser. 36 (1986), 195–217, at 209–10.Google Scholar

45 ‘Myth’, pp. 380–1.Google Scholar

46 Moisl, , ‘Anglo-Saxon Royal Genealogies’, p. 219.Google Scholar

47 ‘In so far as their origin is uncertain, by so much is their power the less’, Epistolae Karolini Aevi II, ed. Duemmler, E., MGH, Epist. 4 (Berlin, 1895), 192 (no. 129).Google Scholar

48 Germania, ch. 2, ed. Winterbottom, and Ogilvie, , p. 38.Google Scholar

49 Cf. Hunter, , ‘German and Roman Antiquity’, p. 33.Google Scholar

50 Ibid. p. 49.

51 See below, n. 62, for the insertion of Caesar in the East Anglian pedigree.

52 Southern, R.W., ‘Aspects of the European Tradition of Historical Writing: I. The Classical Tradition from Einhard to Geoffrey of Monmouth’, TRHS 5th ser. 20 (1970), 173–96, at 189–90.Google Scholar

53 ‘German and Roman Antiquity’, p. 49.Google Scholar

54 Dumville, D.N., ‘The Ætheling: a Study in Anglo-Saxon Constitutional History’, ASE 8 (1979), 1–34.Google Scholar

55 For this terminology, see Kirchhoff, P., ‘The Principles of Clanship in Human Society’, in Readings in Anthropology: II. Readings in Cultural Anthropology, ed. Fried, M.H. (New York, 1959), pp. 259–70Google Scholar, and Sahlins, M.D., Tribesmen (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1968).Google Scholar

56 Cf. Dumville, , ‘Kingship, Genealogies and Regnal Lists’, p. 87.Google Scholar

57 Cf. Dumville, ibid. p. 98.

58 ‘Bedel’, in his Essays in Anglo-Saxon History (London, 1986), pp. 1–27, at 13.Google Scholar Cf. the comment of Turville-Petre, J., ‘On Ynglingatal’, MScand 11 (1978–1979), 48–67, at 66Google Scholar, on the construction of royal genealogies: ‘Symbolic figures are required, to express the concept that every dynasty originated in a world of non-human powers. Divine appellatives are appropriate, and these form the top layer of a properly-constructed genealogy. Some intermediary figures are needed to make a connexion between the divine world and the world of heroic legend.’ See also Hauck, K., ‘Geblutsheiligkeit’, Liber Floridus, ed. Bischoff, B. and Brechter, S. (St Ottilien, 1950), pp. 187–240.Google Scholar

59 Kenney, J.F., Sourcesfor the Early History of Ireland: Ecclesiastical, rev. ed. (New York, 1966), p.299.Google Scholar

60 The Search for Anglo-Saxon Paganism (Cambridge, 1975).Google Scholar

61 Cf. Creed, R.P.,‘Widsith's Journey through Germanic Tradition’, Anglo-Saxon Poetry: Essays in Appreciationfor John C. McGalliard, ed. Nicolson, L.E. and Frese, D.W. (Notre Dame, IN, 1975), pp. 276–87Google Scholar; Howlett, D.R., ‘Form and Genre in Widsith’, ES 55 (1974), 505–11Google Scholar; and French, W.H., ‘Widsith and the Scop’, PMLA 60 (1945), 623–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

62 Cf. line 76, which also mentions Caesar. Fo r commentary, see Widsith, ed. Malone, K. (Copenhagen, 1962), pp. 134–5.Google Scholar Caesar also appears in the East Anglian royal genealogy as a son of Woden; see Chambers, R.W., ‘The Mythical Ancestor of the Kings of East Anglia’, MLR 4 (1908–1909), 508–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar; repr. in EHR 58 (1943), 129–30.Google Scholar

63 ‘For a while Hwala was the best of kings, and Alexander the most powerful of all mankind, and he throve most of those of whom I have heard over the earth’ (lines 14–17). Malone rejects lines 14–17 and 82–3 as interpolations; in his revised edition, he emphasizes this opinion by printing them in smaller type ‘to mark them off from the true text’ (p. 22). Howlett, , ‘Form and Genre in Widsith’, pp. 509–10Google Scholar, also rejects these lines, and Moisl, , ‘Anglo-Saxon Royal Genealogies’, p. 241Google Scholar, is inclined to agree, though he remains non-committal.

64 Den Norsk-Islandske Skjaldedigtning, ed. Jonsson, F. (Copenhagen, 1912–1915), B, I, p. 659.Google ScholarCf. Widsith, ed. Malone, , p. 178.Google Scholar

65 Widsith, pp. 112–16.Google Scholar

66 Dumézil, G., Archaic Roman Religion, trans. Krapp, P., 2 vols. (Chicago, 1970) I, 60–78.Google Scholar

67 Dumézil, G., From Myth to Fiction: The Saga of Hadingus, trans. Coltman, D. (Chicago, 1973), pp. vii–viiiGoogle Scholar; cf. Puhvel, J., ‘Transposition of Myth to Saga in Indo-European Epic Narrative’, Antiquitates Indogermanicae, ed. Mayrhofer, M. et al. (Innsbruck, 1974), pp. 175–84.Google Scholar

68 Cf. Gen. 1.26–7,11.7.

69 An earlier version of this paper was read to the fourth conference of the International Society of Anglo-Saxonists, at Durham, 7–11 08 1989.Google Scholar