Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:35:29.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conservation considerations on Danish Shorthorn Cattle using pedigree analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2011

M. Trinderup ,
J. N. Jørgensen  and
M. Hansen
M. Trinderup
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science and Animal Health, the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, 13 Bülowsvej, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
J. N. Jørgensen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science and Animal Health, the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, 13 Bülowsvej, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
M. Hansen
Affiliation:
The Danish Agricultural Advisory Centre, The National Committee of Danish Cattle Husbandry, 15 Udkjærsvej, Skejby, 8200 Århus N, Denmark
Get access

Summary

The gene dropping method was applied to the pedigree of Danish Shorthorn in order to estimate the proportion of alleles of the old type of Danish Shorthorn in the population of 1997.

It was found that about 23% of the alleles in the population of 1997 originated from the old type. Of 21 base animals of the old type, alleles of seven animals were completely lost in the gene dropping while only six base animals contributed with 20.2% of the alleles in the 1997 population. Inbreeding coefficients ranged from zero to 35.6% with a mean of 4.1%.

Résumé

La méthode gene droppinga été appliquée pour le pédigré du Danois à courtes cornes afin d'estimer la proportion des allèles appartenant au vieux type de Danois à courtes cornes dans la population en 1997. On a trouvé que 23% des allèles dans la population en 1997 provenait du vieux type. Parmi les 21 animaux de base appartenant au vieux type, les allèles de sept d'entre eux ont été complètement perdus pendant le gene dropping, tandis que seulement six des animaux de base ont contribué avec 20,2% des allèles pour la population de 1997. Les coefficients de consanguinité vont de zéro à 35,6% avec une moyenne de 4,1%.

Keywords

DiversityBeef cattleGene dropping
Type
Research Articles
Information
Animal Genetic Resources/Resources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales , Volume 26 , April 1999 , pp. 27 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. 1963–1970. Kvægavlen i Jylland, med et tillæg om kvægbesætninger under tilsyn. Ed. by Harald Rasmussen. Foreningen af Jydske Landboforeningers Husdyrbrugsudvalg. Århus. Denmark, pp. 182Google Scholar
Anon. 1971. Årsberetning fra Landsudvalget for Kvæg. Ed. by Harald Rasmussen. Århus. Denmark, pp. 225.Google Scholar
Anon. 1997. Korthornsbladet. Dansk Korthorns avlerforening. Århus. Denmark, pp. 4.Google Scholar
Bodó, I. 1990a. Methods and experiences with in situ preservation of farm animals. In: FAO Animal Production and Health Paper. Ed. by Wiener, Gerald, FAO Rome. 80: 85–102.Google Scholar
Bodó, I. 1990b. Special problems of conservation of domestic livestock. Proceedings of the 4 World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Edinburgh. 14: 427–433.Google Scholar
Christensen, A. C. 1944. Korthornskvæg. In: Den Ny Landmandsbog II. Second. Edition. Ed. by Bondorff, K.A. & Petersen-Dalum, J.. Westermann, Copenhagen. Denmark, pp. 854.Google Scholar
Dyrbye, N., Glad, T., Møller, K. & Pedersen, K.. 1950. Rationel kvægavl. Third edtion.Konrad Jørgensens Bogtrykkeri, Kolding. Denmark, pp. 425.Google Scholar
Frank, J. 1946. Korthornskvæget i Danmark. In: Haandbog i Kvæghold. Ed. by Andersen, K.M.. Axel Hansen Forlag. Copenhagen, Denmark, pp. 717Google Scholar
Gandini, G. C, Leonarduzzi, R. & Bagnato, A.. 1994. Allele survival in storage of gametes and embryos for conservation. Proceedings of the 5 World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. 21: 397–400.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. 1997. Kødkvægavlen 1996. Landsudvalget for Kvæg. Report no. 66. Århus. Denmark, pp. 38.Google Scholar
Hansen, G. & Bønding, C.. 1967. Kvægbrugets historie. Frederikshavns Avis' Bogtrykkeri. Frederikshavn. Denmark, pp. 52.Google Scholar
Kristensen, E. L. 1990. Facts om erhvervsforhold 2. Spørgeteknik. Mundtlig og skriftlig spørgsmålsformulering. Foreningen til Unge Handelsmænds Uddannelse. Copenhagen. Denmark, pp. 124.Google Scholar
Lund, F. 1986. Dansk Rødbroget Kvæg. In Kvægavlsforeningernes 50 års jubilæum. Ed. by Andersen, J.. De samvirkende danske Kvægavlsforeninger. Århus. Denmark, pp. 159.Google Scholar
MacCluer, J. W., VandeBerg, J.L., Read, B. & Ryder, O.A.. 1986. Pedigree analysis by computer simulation. Zoo Biology. 5: 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maijala, K., Neiman-Sørensen, A., Adalsteinsson, S., Kolstad, N., Danell, B. & Gjelstad, B.. 1990. Conservation of animal gene resources in the nordic countries. Proceedings of the 4 World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Edinburgh. 14: 459–462.Google Scholar
Prosch, V. 1885. Håndbog i det almindelige husdyrbrug. Tredie del: Kvægets Avl og Pleje. Fourth edition. Thiles Bogtrykkeri. Copenhagen. Denmark, pp. 257.Google Scholar
Quaas, R. L. 1976. Computing the diagonal elements and inverse of a large numerator relationship matrix. Biometrics, 32: 949–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svendsen, A. 1906. Kvægavl og kvægopdræt. Fourth edition. Rasmussen & Olsens Bogtrykkeri. Copenhagen. Denmark,Google Scholar