Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:49:32.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF CONSERVING ANIMAL GENETIC RESOURCES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2011

Charles Smith
Affiliation:
AFRC Animal Breed4-ng Research Organization West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JQ, UK
Get access

Summary

The methods of preserving animal genetic resources and the benefits and disadvantages are reviewed. The economic value of preserving germplasm in the face of uncertain needs and opportunities for use in the future is calculated. The conclusion is that the benefits greatly exceed the costs, and in many conditions in developing countries it would be desirable both to preserve and to improve indigenous breeds. International action is desirable to maximize efficiency and minimize risk.

Resume

Les méthodes de conservation des ressources génétiques animals, ai.nsi que les avantages et les inconvénients qui en résulteiit, sont passés en revue. Est-il économiquement rentable de conserver lea ressources génétiques alors que les possibilités d'utilisation future sont incertaines? La conclusion est que les avantages dépassent de beaucoup les couts et que, dans de nombreux cas, les pays en développement auraient intérèt à la fois à préserver et à améliorer les races indigènes. Une action Internationale est souhaitable pour assurer une efficacité maximum et réduire les risques au minimum.

Resumen

Se pasa revista a los métodos para preserver los recursos genéticos animales, asi como los beneficios y las ventajas que entrañan. Se calcula el valor económico de la conservación de germoplasma en vista de las posibles necesidades y oportunidades de utilización en el futuro. La conclusión a que se llega es que los beneficios exceden con mucho de los costos, y de que, en muchas sittiaciones, convendría preservar y mejorar las razas indigenas en los parses en desarrollo. Es deseable la acción en el piano internacional para auinentar al máximo la eficiencia y minimizar los riesgos.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bird, P.J.W.N. and Mitchell, G. The choice of discount rate in animal breeding investment 1980 appraisal. Anim. Breed. Abst. 48:499505.Google Scholar
Land, R.L. An alternative philosophy for livestock breeding. Livestock Prod. Sci. 8:95198199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maijala, K., Cherekaev, A.V., De lrillard, J.M., Reklewski, Z., Rognoni, G., Simon, D.L. and 1984 Steane D.E. Conservation of animal genetic resources in Europe. Livestock Prod. Sci. 11:322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, I.L. Conservation of animal genetic resources. Ist World Congress of Genetics1974 Applied to Livestock Prod. Madrid 2:1321.Google Scholar
Harvesting, Parez M., processing, storage and subsequent use of animal cells in developing countries. -1984 FAO/UNEP Joint Expert Panel on Animal Genetic Resources, Conservation and Management. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
Simon, D.L. Conservation of animal genetic resources. Livestock Prod. Sci. 11:2336. 1984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. Use of stored frozen semen and embryos to measure genetic trends in farm live—1977 stock. Z. Tierzuctit. Zuchtungsbiologie 94:119127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. Estimated costs of genetic conservation in farm animals. FAO/UNEP Joint Expert1984 Panel on Animal Genetic Resources, Conservation and Management. FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
Smitli, C. Scope for selecting many breeding stocks of possible economic value in the1985 future (In preparation).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steane D.E. European conservation: the next ten years. The Ark, September 1983. 1983Google Scholar
Weller, J. and Soller, 4. Random mating and selection to produce multi-marker strains. 1981 Theor. App. Genetics 59:7377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar