Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:11:04.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adaptive changes in the appetite, growth and feeding behaviour of pony mares offered ad libitum access to a complete diet in either a pelleted or chaff-based form

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

C. McG. Argo ,
J. E. Cox ,
C. Lockyer  and
Z. Fuller
C. McG. Argo*
Affiliation:
School of Biological and Earth Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK
J. E. Cox
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences and Animal Husbandry, University of Liverpool, Leahurst, Neston CH64 7TE, UK
C. Lockyer
Affiliation:
Spillers Speciality Feeds Ltd., Old Wolverton, Milton Keynes MK12 5PZ, UK
Z. Fuller
Affiliation:
School of Biological and Earth Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L3 3AF, UK
*
E-mail:BESCARGO@livjm.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

Seven, 3-year-old pony mares (~230 kg) were used in a cross-over study to compare the appetite, energy and nutrient digestibilities, growth rate and feeding behaviour, when a complete diet was offered ad libitum in either the original loose-chaff mix (C), or as a more convenient, milled and pelleted preparation (P). Ad libitum access to the study diet (gross energy = 17·2 MJ/kg dry matter (DM)) was attained over 2 weeks. In the following 4 weeks, groups 1 (no. = 3) and 2 (no. = 4) received pelleted and chaff-based diets respectively. Dietary forms were exchanged during week 5 and ad libitum provision continued for a further 4 weeks. Behaviour and apparent nutrient digestibilities were assessed in weeks 3 and 4 of each period. Pelleted food had a lower proportion of water (P, 0·12; C, 0·22), but relative proportions of oil (0·04), crude protein (0·08), crude fibre (0·29), neutral-detergent fibre (NDF; 0·53) and gross energy (GE) were neither altered by food processing nor time. Apparent digestibilities (DM, 0·49; GE, 0·50; NDF, 0·40 in period 1) of the pelleted and chaff-based diets were similar within periods but decreased (P 0·01) to a similar extent for both diet types (proportional changes: DM, –0·14; GE, –0·16; NDF, –0·28) in period 2. Overall, mean intakes of digestible energy (DE) for chaff-fed animals during period 1 were 0·73 (P 0·001) of pellet DE intake (DEI). Mean DEI of pellets increased (P 0·001) during period 1 to attain 1·76 (s.e. 0·25) MJ/kg M0·75 on day 25. Following transfer from pellets to chaff, DEI decreased (P 0·001) to 0·68 (s.e. 0·07) MJ/kg M0·75 by the end of period 2. In contrast, DEI of animals which progressed from chaff to pellets remained relatively constant between periods. Oestrous behaviour caused no detectable change in the appetite of individual mares. Irrespective of differences in DEI, average daily gain (ADG) in body weight and condition score (CS) did not differ between groups. Overall, mean ADG decreased (P 0·01) from 1·54 (s.e. 0·17) kg/day in period 1 to 0·26 (s.e.0·08) kg/day in period 2. Changes in body weight were associated with CS (R2 = 0·72). Each CS point represented a 53·4 (s.e. 4·8) kg gain in body weight. Chaff meals were longer (30·6 (s.e. 1·6) min, P 0·001), less frequent (23·8 (s.e. 1·4) per day, P 0·001) and associated with a lower bite rate (3·8 (s.e.0·2) per min, P 0·001) and increased chewing requirement (23 (s.e. 1·2) per bite, P 0·001), which decreased the rate of DM intake (17·0 (s.e. 0·9) g/min, P 0·0.01). Overall, chaff-fed animals spent more time feeding (0·50 (s.e. 1·3) of the time; P 0·0.01), primarily at the expense of non-feeding activity and rest. The ad libitum feeding regime enabled stabled ponies to re-establish natural feeding patterns and offers a viable alternative to meal and forage feeding. The more slowly ingested chaff form maximized time spent feeding and limited changes in DEI during the introductory period. Although CS and ADG increased over the first 4 weeks, growth and appetite returned to near maintenance values within 9 weeks in association with a decrease in dietary energy intake and nutrient digestibility.

Keywords

appetitedigestibilityfeeding behaviourhorsesnutrition
Type
Non-ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 74 , Issue 3 , June 2002 , pp. 517 - 528
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, F. and Hickson, J. C. D. 1970. The salivary and pancreatic secretions of the horse. In Physiology of digestion and metabolism in the ruminant (ed. Phillipson, A. T.), pp. 375–389. Oriel Press, Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Allden, W. G. 1968. Undernutrition of the Merino sheep and its sequelae. I V. Herbage consumption and utilization of feed for wool production following growth restrictions imposed at two stages of early post-natal life in a Mediterranean environment. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 19: 977–1007.Google Scholar
Archer, M. 1973. The species preference of grazing horses. Journal of the British Grassland Society 28: 123–132.Google Scholar
Bigot, G., Trillaud-Geyl, C. and Martin-Rosset, W. 1989. Winter feeding and growth of young horses sold at 42 months of age. Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
Brobeck, J. R., Wheatland, M. and Stominger, J. L. 1947. Variations in regulation of energy exchange associated with estrus, diestrus and pseudo-pregnancy in rats. Endocrinology 40: 65–72.Google Scholar
Carstens, G. E., Johnson, D. E. and Ellenberger, M. A. 1987. The energetics of compensatory growth in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 65: (suppl. 1) 263–264. Google Scholar
Cooper, J. J. and Mason, G. 1998. The identification of abnormal behaviour and behavioural problems in stabled horses and their relationship to horse welfare: a comparative review. Equine Veterinary Journal 27: (supplement) 5–10.Google Scholar
Cymbaluk, N. F., Christison, G. I. and Leach, D. H. 1989. Nutrient utilization by limit-and ad libitum-fed growing horses. Journal of Animal Science 67: 414–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doreau, M. 1978. Feeding behaviour of stabled horses. Annales de Zootechnie 27: 291–302.Google Scholar
Duncan, P. 1985. Time-budgets of Camargue horses. III. Environmental influences. Behaviour 92: 188–208.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. N. W. and Lawrence, T. L. J. 1978. Energy under-nutrition in the weanling filly foal. I. Effects on subsequent live-weight gains and onset of oestrus. British Veterinary Journal 134: 205–211.Google Scholar
Frape, D. 1986. Equine nutrition and feeding. Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow.Google Scholar
Fuller, Z., Cox, J. E. and Argo, C. McG. 2001. Photoperiodic entrainment of seasonal changes in the appetite, feeding behaviour, growth rate and pelage of pony colts. Animal Science 72: 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillham, S. B., Dodman, N. H., Shuster, L., Kream, R. and Rand, W. 1994. The effect of diet on cribbing behaviour and plasma-endorphin in horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 41: 147–153.Google Scholar
Haenlein, G. F. W., Holdren, R. D. and Yoon, Y. N. 1966. Comparative responses of horses and sheep to different physical forms of alfalfa hay. Journal of Animal Science 25: 740–752.Google Scholar
Hammond, C. J., Mason, D. K. and Watkins, K. L. 1986. Gastric ulceration in mature thoroughbred horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 18: 284–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hintz, H. F. and Loy, R. G. 1966. Effects of pelleting on the nutritive value of horse rations. Journal of Animal Science 25: 1059–1062.Google Scholar
Houpt, K. A. and McDonnell, S. M. 1993. Equine stereotypies. Compendium of Continuing Education for the Practicing Veterinarian 15: 1265–1271.Google Scholar
Janis, C. 1975. The evolutionary strategy of the Equidae, and the origins of rumen and caecal digestion. Evolution 30: 757–774.Google Scholar
Kay, R. N. B., Milne, J. A. and Hamilton, W. J. 1984. Nutrition of red deer for meat production. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 82: 231–242.Google Scholar
Kirk, R. E. 1982. Experimental design: procedures for the behavioural sciences, second edition. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., New York.Google Scholar
Klieber, M. 1932. Body size and metabolism. Hilgardia 6: 315–353.Google Scholar
Laut, J. E., Houpt, K. A., Hintz, H. F. and Houpt, T. R. 1985. The effect of caloric dilution on meal patterns and food intake of ponies. Physiology and Behavior 35: 549–554.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. L. J. and Fowler, V. R. 1997. Growth of farm animals. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Leighton-Hardman, A. C. 1980. Equine nutrition. Pelham Books, London.Google Scholar
McDonald, P., Edwards, R. A., Greenhalgh, J. F. D. and Morgan, C. A. 1995. Animal nutrition, fifth edition. Longman Singapore Publishers (Pte) Ltd, Singapore.Google Scholar
McGreevy, P. D., French, N. P. and Nicol, C. J. 1995. The prevalence of abnormal behaviours in dressage, eventing and endurance horses in relation to stabling. Veterinary Record 137: 36–37.Google Scholar
McGreevy, P. D. and Nicol, C. J. 1998. Physiological and behavioural consequences associated with short-term prevention of crib-biting in horses. Physiological Behaviour 65: 15–23.Google Scholar
Martin-Rosset, W. and Dulphy, J. P. 1987. Digestibility interactions between forages and concentrates in horses: influence of feeding level-comparison with sheep. Livestock Production Science 17: 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council. 1961. Nutrient requirements of horses. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 1978. Nutrient requirements of horses. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Nicol, C. J. 1999. Understanding equine stereotypies. Equine Veterinary Journal 28: (supplement) 20–25.Google Scholar
Ott, E. A. 1981. Influences of level of feeding on digestive efficiency of the horse. Proceedings of the seventh equine nutrition and physiology symposium, Virginia, USA, pp. 37–43.Google Scholar
Paladines, O. L., Reid, J. T., Niekerk, B. D. H.van and Bensadoun, A. 1964. Energy utilization by sheep as influenced by the physical form, composition and level of intake of the diet. Journal of Nutrition 83: 49–56.Google Scholar
Ralston, S. 1982. Common behavioural problems of horses. Compendium of Continuing Education for the Practicing Veterinarian 4: S142–S148.Google Scholar
Ralston, S. 1984. Controls of feeding in horses. Journal of Animal Science 59: 1353–1363.Google Scholar
Ralston, S., Van den Broek, G. and Baile, C. A. 1979. Feed intake patterns and associated blood glucose, free fatty acid and insulin changes in ponies. Journal of Animal Science 49: 838–845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryg, M. and Jacobsen, E. 1982. Seasonal changes in growth rate, feed intake, growth hormone and thyroid hormones in young male reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus). Canadian Journal of Zoology 60: 15–23.Google Scholar
Sibbald, A. M. and Rhind, S. M. 1997. The effect of previous body condition on appetite and associated insulin profiles in sheep. Animal Science 64: 247–252.Google Scholar
Slonaker, J. R. 1925. Analysis of daily activity of the albino rat. American Journal of Physiology 71: 362–394.Google Scholar
Stull, C. and Rodiek, A. V. 1988. Responses of blood glucose, insulin and cortisol concentrations to common equine diets. Journal of Nutrition 118: 206–213.Google Scholar
Suttie, J. M., Goodall, E. D., Pennie, K. and Kay, R. N. B. 1983. Winter food restriction and summer compensation in red deer stage (Cervus elaphus). British Journal of Nutrition 50: 737–747.Google Scholar
Tartellin, M. F. 1968. Cyclic variations in food and water intake by ewes. Journal of Physiology 195: 25–31.Google Scholar
Todd, L. K., Sauer, W. C., Christopherson, R. J., Coleman, R. J. and Caine, W. R. 1994. The effect of feeding different forms of alfalfa on nutrient digestibility and voluntary food intake in horses. Journal of Animal Physiology 73: 1–8.Google Scholar
Todd, L. K., Sauer, W. C., Christopherson, R. J., Coleman, R. J. and Caine, W. R. 1995. The effect of level of feed intake on nutrient and energy digestibilities and rate of feed passage in horses. Journal of Animal Science 73: 140–148.Google Scholar
Tyler, S. L. 1972. The behaviour and social organisation of the New Forest ponies. Animal Behaviour Monographs 5: 96–103.Google Scholar
Warner, A. C. I. 1981. Rate of passage of digesta through the gut of mammals and birds. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, Series B 51: 789–820.Google Scholar
Willard, J. G., Willard, J. C. and Baker, J. P. 1977. Effect of diet on cecal pH and feeding behaviour of horses. Journal of Animal Science 45: 87–93.Google Scholar