Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:01:12.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of body condition and previous nutrition on the herbage intakes of ewes grazing autumn pastures at two sward heights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2016

A. M. Sibbald  and
W. G. Kerr
A. M. Sibbald
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QJ
W. G. Kerr
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QJ
Get access

Abstract

To examine the effects of body condition and previous nutrition on the herbage intake of ewes grazing swards of different heights in autumn, 96 Scottish Blackface X Border Leicester ewes with a wide range of body condition (score 1·75 to 3·50), were initially housed and given 50 g dry matter (DM) per kg metabolic live weight (M)0·75 per day (treatment L) or 95 g DM per kg M0·75 per day (treatment H) of a pelleted dried grass diet (11·6 MJ metabolizable energy per kg DM) for 6 weeks after weaning in July. The H ewes gained more live weight (9·0 v. 2·7 kg) and body condition score (0·39 v. 0·17) than the L ewes. Half the animals from each treatment were then allocated to each of two ryegrass pastures with a sward height of 5 cm (LS) or 10 cm (HS) for a further 6-week grazing period. During the grazing period there was no significant effect of indoor feeding level on herbage intake, but the L ewes gained more live weight (6·4 v. 5·0 kg) than the H ewes. On the HS, compared with the LS sward, mean herbage intakes were higher (70·0 v. 60·5 g DM per kg M0·75) as were gains in live weight and condition score (7·9 v. 3·4 kg; 0·18 v. 0·0). There were no interactions between the effects of sward height and previous feeding level on herbage intake. Ewes in low body condition (< 2·5) at the start of the grazing period ingested the same amount of herbage on both swards (70·3 g DM per kg M0·75) whereas ewes in high body condition (> 2·5) ingested more (67·0 v. 51·6 g DM per kg M0·75) on the HS compared with the LS sward. The responses of ewes in low and high body condition to different sward heights are discussed in relation to appetite drive and aspects of grazing behaviour.

Keywords

body conditionfood intakegrazingsheepsward height.
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 58 , Issue 2 , April 1994 , pp. 231 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, G. W. 1981. Grazing behaviour. In Grazing animals (ed. Morley, F. H. W.) World Animal Science B1, pp. 79–104. Elsevier Scientific, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Arnold, G. W. and Birrel, H. A. 1977. Food intake and grazing behaviour of sheep varying in body condition. Animal Production 24: 343–353.Google Scholar
Allden, G. W. and Whittaker, I. A. M. 1970. The determinants of herbage intake by grazing sheep: the interrelationship of factors influencing herbage intake and availability. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 21: 755–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthram, G. T. 1981. Sward structure and the depth of the grazed horizon. Grass and Forage Science 36: 130–131 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Barthram, G. T. 1986. Experimental techniques: the HFRO sward stick. Biennial report, Hill Farming Research Organisation 1984–1985, pp. 29–30.Google Scholar
Chambers, A. R. M., Hodgson, J. and Milne, J. A. 1981. The development and use of equipment for the automatic recording of ingestive behaviour in sheep and cattle. Grass and Forage Science 36: 97–105.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M. 1986. The voluntary food intake of farm animals. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. G. 1983. The influence of nutriton on the reproductive performance of ewes. In Sheep production (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 99–110. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Gunn, R. G., Smith, W. F., Senior, A. J., Barthram, E., Sim, D. A. and Hunter, E. A. 1991. Pre-mating herbage intake and the reproductive performance of North Country Cheviot ewes in different levels of body condition. Animal Production 52: 149–156.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. 1981. Variations in the surface characteristics of the sward and the short-term rate of herbage intake by calves and lambs. Grass and Forage Science 36: 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. 1982. Ingestive behaviour. In Herbage intake handbook (ed. Leaver, J. D.), pp. 113–138. The British Grassland Society, Hurley.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1987. Genstat 5 reference manual. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Mayes, R. W. M., Lamb, C. S. and Colgrove, P. M. 1986. The use of dosed and herbage n-alkanes as markers for the determination of herbage intake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107: 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penning, P. D. 1986. Some effects of sward conditions on grazing behaviour and intake by sheep. In Grazing research at northern latitudes (ed. Gudmundsson, O.), proceedings of a NATO advanced workshop, Hvanneyri, Iceland. Plenum Press series A: life sciences, vol. 108, pp. 219–226.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F. 1971. Relationships between energy intake and productivity in hill sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 30: 197–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russel, A. J. F., Doney, J. M. and Gunn, R. G. 1969. Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72: 451–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, A. J. F. 1989. Bioenergetics, bioengineering and growth. Animal Production 48: 249–269.Google Scholar
Wright, I. A., Russel, A. J. F. and Hunter, E. A. 1987. The effects of genotype and post-weaning nutrition on compensatory growth in cattle reared as singles or twins. Animal Production 45: 423–432.Google Scholar