Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:11:41.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feeding behaviour, food intake and milk production responses of lactating dairy cows to diets based on grass silage of high or low dry-matter content, supplemented with quickly and slowly fermentable energy sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

D. L. Romney ,
V. Blunn ,
R. Sanderson  and
J. D. Leaver
D. L. Romney*
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Institute, Chatham Maritime, Chatham, Kent ME4 4TB, UK
V. Blunn
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of London, Ashford, Kent TN25 5AH, UK
R. Sanderson
Affiliation:
Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Plas Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 3EB, UK
J. D. Leaver
Affiliation:
Wye College, University of London, Ashford, Kent TN25 5AH, UK
*
†Present address: International Livestock Research Institute, PO Box 30709, Nairobi, Kenya.
Get access

Abstract

Twelve dairy cows in early lactation were offered low (L; 215 g/kg) or high (H; 449 g/kg) dry matter(DM) content silages, prepared using material from the same sward. In addition, all animals received 9 kg/day, of supplements based on barley (B), sugar-beet pulp (SB) or a 50: 50 mixture of the two (B: SB), in two equal portions at 07:30 and 14:30 h. The six treatments were offered in an incomplete Latin square design. Mean intakes of H (14·4 kg DM per day) were significantly higher than intakes observed for L (10·0 kg DM per day) (P < 0·001). Within silage type, highest intakes were observed for cows receiving the SB supplement (P < 0·01). Higher intakes of H were reflected in higher total milk yield (P < 0·05) as well as fat (P < 0·05) and protein (P < 0·01) yield. Milk protein concentration was greater for animals receiving silage H (P < 0·001), with lower values being observed for animals consuming SB (P < 0·05), within silage type. Time spent eating, duration and number of meals were similar for either silage and the higher intakes of H silage reflected greater intake rates (g DM per min) (P < 0·001) resulting in larger meal sizes (P < 0·001). All chewing indices (time spent eating silage, ruminating and total time chewing per kg DM ingested) were greater for the L silage (P < 0·001). It is concluded that the benefits in forage intake with higher DM grass silages, for high yielding dairy cows, are associated with consequential benefits in milk yield and milk protein content. The most likely explanation for the greater intakes is a faster particle breakdown in the rumen allowing larger meal sizes before animals became constrained. The higher intakes of silage when animals consumed the SB supplement may be due to a slower rate of fermentation of the supplement, which was more closely matched to that of silage. Although not significant there was a tendency for differences in silage intake between animals receiving B compared with SB supplements to be greater for animals receiving the H silage suggesting that supplementation strategies to ensure optimal forage utilization may differ for silages of differing DM content.

Keywords

dairy cowsfeeding behaviourfood intakemilk production
Type
Ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , October 2000 , pp. 349 - 357
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, M. S. 1996. Physical constraints on voluntary intake for forages by ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 74: 3063–3075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aman, P. and Hesselman, K. 1984. Analysis of starch and other main constituents of cereal grains. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 14: 135–139.Google Scholar
Bae, D. H., Welch, J. A. G. and Smith, A. M. 1979. Forage intake and rumination by sheep. Journal of Animal Science 49: 1292–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beever, D. E., Sutton, J. D., Thomson, D. J., Napper, D. J. and Gale, D. L. 1988. Comparison of dried molassed and unmolassed sugar-beet feed and barley as energy supplements on nutrient digestion and supply in silage-fed cows. Animal Production 46: 490 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Boever, J. L. de, Smet, A. de, Brabander, D. L. de and Boucque, C. V. 1993. Evaluation of physical structure. 1. Grass silage. Journal of Dairy Science 76: 140–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolat, D., Drochner, W. and Elkholi, M. 1988. Zur pansenfermentation beim schaf bei austausch der taglichen gerstegabe gegen melasse-schnitzel und bei zulage eines polyetherantibiotikums (salinomycin-Na). Wirtschaftseigene Futter 34: 199–217.Google Scholar
Coulon, J. B., Doreau, M., Remond, B. and Journet, M. 1987. Evolution des activites alimentaires des vaches laitieres en debut de lactation et liaison avec les quantites d’aliments ingerees. Reproduction, Nutrition, Développement 27: 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deswysen, A. G., Ellis, W. C. and Pond, K. R. 1987. Interrelationships among voluntary intake, eating and ruminating behaviour and ruminal motility of heifers fed corn silage. Journal of Animal Science 64: 835–841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faverdin, P. 1999. The effects of nutrients on feed intake in ruminants. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 58: 523–531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faverdin, P., Dulphy, J. P., Coulon, J. B., Verite, R., Garel, J. P., Rouel, J. and Marquis, B. 1991. Substitution of roughage by concentrates for dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 27: 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
France, J., Dhanoa, M. S., Theodorou, M. K., Lister, S. J., Davies, D. R. and Isaac, D. 1993. A model to interpret gas accumulation profiles associated with in vitro degradation of ruminant feeds. Journal of Theoretical Biology 163: 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fussell, R. J. and McCalley, D. V. 1987. Determination of volatile fatty acids (C2-C5) and lactic acid in silage by gas chromatography. Analyst 112: 1213–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GENSTAT 5 Committee. 1993. GENSTAT 5 reference manual. Clarendon Press, London.Google Scholar
Gill, M. and Romney, D. 1994. The relationship between the control of meal size and the control of daily intake in ruminants. Livestock Production Science 39: 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givens, D. I., Everington, J. M. and Adamson, A. H. 1989. The digestibility and ME content of grass silage and their prediction from laboratory measurements. Animal Feed Science and Technology 24: 27–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, F. J. 1989. Effect of silage additive and wilting on animal performance. In Recent advances in animal nutrition — 1989 (ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 159–173. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, F. J., Dawson, L. E. R., Ferris, C. P., Steen, R. W. J. and Kilpatrick, D. J. 1999. The influence of wilting and forage additive type on the energy utilisation of grass silage by growing cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 79: 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, J. A. 1987. Design of milk production trials. Livestock Production Science 16: 373–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huhtanen, P. 1993. The effects of concentrate energy source and protein content on milk production in cows given grass silage ad libitum . Grass and Forage Science 48: 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Dairy Federation. 1988. Whole milk determination of milk fat, protein and lactose content — guide for the operation of mid-infra-red instruments. International Dairy Federation Standard 141: 1988.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. R. 1976. Influence of carbohydrate solubility on non-protein nitrogen utilisation in the ruminant. Journal of Animal Science 43: 184–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindberg, J. E. 1981. The effect of basal diet on the ruminal degradation of dry matter, nitrogenous compounds and cell walls in nylon bags. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 11: 159–169.Google Scholar
Marsh, R. 1979. The effects of wilting on fermentation in the silo and on the nutritive value of silage. Grass and Forage Science 34: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1986. The analysis of agricultural materials. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food reference book no. 427. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1993. Prediction of the energy values of compound feedingstuffs for farm animals. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Okine, E. K. and Mathison, G. W. 1991. Effects of feed intake on particle distribution, passage of digesta, and extent of digestion in the gastrointestinal tract of cattle. Journal of Animal Science 69: 3435-3445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson, D. C., Yan, T. and Gordon, F. J. 1996. The effects of wilting of grass prior to ensiling on the response to bacterial inoculation. 2. Intake and performance by dairy cattle over three harvests. Animal Science 62: 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, D. C., Yan, T., Gordon, F. J. and Kilpatrick, D. J. 1998. Effects of bacterial inoculation of unwilted and wilted grass silages. 2. Intake, performance and eating behaviour by dairy cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 131: 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peoples, A. C. and Gordon, F. J. 1989. The influence of wilting and season of silage harvest and the fat and protein concentration of the supplement on milk production and food utilization by lactating cattle. Animal Production 48: 305–317.Google Scholar
Prasad, C. S., Wood, C. D. and Sampath, K. T. 1994. Use of in vitro gas production to evaluate rumen fermentation of untreated and urea-treated finger millet straw (Eleusine coracana) supplemented with different levels of concentrate. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 65: 457–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohr, K. and Thomas, C. 1984. Intake, digestibility and animal performance. In Efficiency of silage systems: a comparison between unwilted and wilted silages (ed. Zimmer, E. and Wilkins, R. J.), pp. 64–70. Landbauforschung Volkenrode, Sonderheft 69.Google Scholar
Sanderson, R., Romney, D. L., Blunn, V. J. and Leaver, J. D. 1998. Mechanisms regulating voluntary intake of conserved herbages. In Co-ordination of components of DS04: optimisation of forage quality and intake by ruminants (ed. Gill, M.). MAFF RUMINT report DS 04/12. Natural Resources International, Chatham, Kent.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D., Bertrand, D. and Griger, S. 1985. Variations and prevision of the in sacco dry matter digestion of concentrates and by-products. Animal Feed Science and Technology 13: 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibly, R. M., Nott, H. M. R. and Fletcher, D. J. 1990. Splitting behaviour into bouts. Animal Behaviour 39: 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, L. A., Garnsworthy, P. C., Newbold, J. R. and Buttery, P. J. 1993. Effect of synchronizing the rate of dietary energy and nitrogen release on rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis in sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 120: 251–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, R. W. J., Gordon, F. J., Dawson, L. E. R., Park, R. S., Mayne, C. S., Agnew, R. E., Kilpatrick, D. J. and Porter, M. G. 1998. Factors affecting the intake of grass silage by cattle and prediction of silage intake. Animal Science 66: 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teller, E., Vanbelle, M. and Kamatali, P. 1993. Chewing behaviour and voluntary grass silage intake by cattle. Livestock Production Science 33: 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teller, E., Vanbelle, M., Kamatali, P., Collignon, G., Page, B. and Matatu, B. 1990. Effects of chewing behaviour and ruminal digestion processes on voluntary intake of grass silages by lactating dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 75: 3897–3904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theodorou, M. K., Williams, B. A., Dhanoa, M. S., McAllan, A. B. and France, J. 1994. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 48: 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiago, L. R. L., Gill, M. and Dhanoa, M. S. 1992. Studies of method of conserving grass herbage and frequency of feeding in cattle. 1. Voluntary feed intake, digestion and rate of passage. British Journal of Nutrition 67: 305–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, P. C., Robertson, S., Chamberlain, D. G., Livingstone, R. M., Garthwaite, P. H., Dewey, P. J. S. and Cole, D. J. A. 1988. Predicting the metabolisable energy content of compounded feeds for ruminants. In Recent advances in animal nutrition – 1988 (ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 127–146. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tingvall, P. 1978. Determination of nitrogen with copper as catalyst for high-temperature digestion. Analyst 103: 406–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, R. J. 1984. A review of the effects of wilting on the composition and feeding value of silages. In Efficiency of silage systems: a comparison between unwilted and wilted silages (ed. E. Zimmer and Wilkins, R. J.), pp. 5–12. Landbauforschung Volkenrode, Sonderheft 69.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, J. M., Hill, J. and Leaver, J. D. 1999. Effect of swath treatment on water loss during field wilting and on feeding value of perennial ryegrass silage. Grass and Forage Science 54: 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar