Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:22:13.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fish-meal supplementation of grass silage given to young growing steers: effect on intake, apparent digestibility and live-weight gains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. Sanderson ,
C. Thomas  and
A. B. McAllan
R. Sanderson
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Hurley Research Station, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
C. Thomas
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, Auchincruive, Ayr KA6 5HW
A. B. McAllan
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Hurley Research Station, Hurley, Maidenhead SL6 5LR
Get access

Abstract

Seventy-two, 4-month-old, British Friesian steers were used to investigate the effects of feeding a supplement of fish meal on the voluntary intake and live-weight gain by young growing cattle given a well preserved ryegrass silage. The silage was offered either alone or mixed with 50,100 or 150 g fish meal per kg silage dry matter (DM) and the diets were offered either ad libitum or intakes were restricted to 16, 19 or 22 g dietary DM per kg live weight (LW). Intakes were recorded daily, LW weekly and in vivo apparent digestibility over one 7-day period during the 132-day trial.

For animals fed ad libitum, the absolute intake of dietary DM increased linearly with an increase in the level of fish-meal supplementation such that intake when the highest level of fish meal was given was significantly higher (P < 0·01) than when silage was given alone. However, DM intake per unit LW (approx. 24 g DM per kg LW) was not affected significantly (P > 0·05).

Inclusion of fish meal in the diet did not affect the apparent digestibility of dietary DM, organic matter, acid-detergent or neutral-detergent fibre (NDF) although there was a trend for slightly higher (P > 0·05) gross energy apparent digestibility when fish meal was given. Increasing the level of feeding reduced NDF digestibility. The coefficients measured at the 22 g and ad libitum levels of intake were lower (P < 0·01 and P < 0·05 respectively) than that measured at the 16 g DM per kg LW level.

Animals given silage alone to appetite achieved LW gains of 0·6 kg/day. LW gains increased linearly with increasing level of feeding (P < 0·001) and increasing level offish-meal supplementation (P < 0·001).

Keywords

fish mealfood intakegrass silagelive-weight gainsteers
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , December 1992 , pp. 389 - 396
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E. 1980. The utilisation of protein in conserved forages. In Forage conservation in the 80's (ed. Thomas, C.), occasional symposium of the British Grassland Society, no. 11, pp. 131–143.Google Scholar
Beever, D. E., Gill, M., Dawson, J. M. and Buttery, P. J. 1990. The effect of fishmeal on the digestion of grass silage by growing cattle. British Journal of Nutrition 63: 489–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cammell, S. B. 1977. Equipment and techniques used for research into the intake and digestion of forages by sheep and cattle. Technical report, Grassland Research Institute, 24.Google Scholar
Chappie, D. G. 1985. Feeding young calves on silage-only diets. Grass and Forage Science 40: 237–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, O. D. and Evans, C. 1985. The effect on weaned suckled calves of supplementing silage with varying levels of white-fish meal. Animal Production 40: 552 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Dawson, J. M., Bruce, C. I., Buttery, P. J., Gill, M. and Beever, D. E. 1988. Protein metabolism in the rumen of silage-fed steers: effect of fishmeal supplementation. British Journal of Nutrition 60: 339–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drennan, M. 1973. Supplementation of silage with protein for beef cattle. Irish Grassland and Animal Production Association Journal 8: 32–41.Google Scholar
England, P. and Gill, M. 1985. The effect of fish meal and sucrose supplementation on the voluntary intake of grass silage and live-weight gain of young cattle. Animal Production 40: 259–265.Google Scholar
Forbes, T. J. and Irwin, J. H. D. 1970. Silage for winter fattening. Journal of the British Grassland Society 25: 96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garstang, J. R., Thomas, C. and Gill, M. 1979. The effect of supplementation of grass silage with fish meal on intake and performance by British Friesian calves. Animal Production 28: 423 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Gibb, M. J. and Baker, R. D. 1987. Performance of young steers offered silage or thermo-ammoniated hay with or without a fish-meal supplement. Animal Production 45: 371–381.Google Scholar
Gill, M. and Beever, D. E. 1982. The effect of protein supplementation on digestion and glucose metabolism in young cattle fed on silage. British Journal of Nutrition 48: 37–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, M., Beever, D. E., Buttery, P. J., England, P., Gibb, M. J. and Baker, R. D. 1987. The effect of oestradiol-17β implantation on the response in voluntary intake, live-weight gain and body composition, to fishmeal supplementation of silage offered to growing calves. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108: 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, M. and England, P. 1984. Effect of degradability of protein supplements on voluntary intake and nitrogen retention in young cattle fed grass silage. Animal Production 39: 31–36.Google Scholar
Gill, M., Poppi, D. P., Evans, R. T. and Sargeant, A. 1990. The effect of level of fish meal on voluntary intake and rumen function in young cattle offered silage-only diets. Animal Production 50: 552 (abstr.).Google Scholar
McAllan, A. B. 1991a. Sources of nitrogen supplements to maximise cereal crop residue digestion in the rumen. In Production and utilisation of lignocellulosics (ed. Galletti, G. C.), pp. 375–385. Elsevier Applied Science, London.Google Scholar
McAllan, A. B. 1991b. Carbohydrate and nitrogen metabolism in the forestomach of steers given untreated or ammonia treated barley straw diets supplemented with urea or urea plus fishmeal. Animal Feed Science and Technology 33: 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, E. L. and Pike, I. H. 1987. Feeding for profitable beef production: use of fishmeal to improve feed efficiency and feeding costs. Association of Fishmeal Manufacturers in conjunction with International Association of Fish Meal Manufacturers.Google Scholar
Ortigues, I. 1987. Nutrient supply, growth and calorimetric effiency in heifers offered straw rich diets. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. 1981. Biometry — the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 2nd ed. New York.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics — a biometrical approach. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Kogakusha Ltd, Tokyo.Google Scholar
Thiago, L. R. L. 1988. Voluntary intake of forages by ruminants: factors related to eating behaviour and rumen fill. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Gill, M. and Austin, A. R. 1980. The effects of supplements of fishmeal and lactic acid on voluntary intake of silage by calves. Grass and Forage Science 35: 275–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, C. and Thomas, P. C. 1986. Factors affecting the nutritive value of grass silages. In Recent advances in animal nutrition — 1986 (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 223–256. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E., Lonsdale, C. R., Haines, M. J., Cammell, S. B. and Austin, A. R. 1981. The digestion by cattle of grass silage made with formic acid and formic acid-formaldehyde. British Journal of Nutrition 46: 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veira, D. M., Butler, G., Ivan, M. and Proulx, J. G. 1985. Utilisation of grass silage by cattle: effect of barley and fishmeal supplements. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 65: 897–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veira, D. M. and Charmley, E. 1988. The effect of fishmeal and soyabean meal on digestion in the stomach and total gut of sheep fed grass silage. Proceedings of the eighth silage conference, Hurley, 1987, pp. 75–76. AFRC Institute of Grassland and Animal Production.Google Scholar
Waldo, D. R. and Tyrell, H. F. 1980. The relation of insoluble nitrogen intake to gain, energy retention and nitrogen retention in Holstein steers. In Protein metabolism and nutrition (ed. Oslage, H. J., Rohr, K.), European Association of Animal Production publication no. 27, pp. 572–577. Braunschweig, F.R. Germany.Google Scholar
Wilkins, R. J., Fenlon, J. S., Cook, J. E. and Wilson, R. F. 1978. A further analysis of relationships between silage composition and voluntary intake in sheep. In Silage production and utilization — proceedings of the fifth silage conference, Ayr (ed. Harkess, R. D.), pp. 34–35. Scottish Agricultural Colleges.Google Scholar