Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:45:54.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth and conception in continuously underfed Brahman heifers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. R. Vera
R. R. Vera
Affiliation:
Tropical Pastures Programme, Centro International Agricultura Tropical, Cali, Colombia
Get access

Abstract

The objective of the experiment was to determine the effects of different, sustained levels of undernutrition on the reproductive performance of Brahman heifers, and on their subsequent growth to adulthood, when reared exclusively on a low-quality tropical pasture.

Irrespective of the live-weight gains realized between weaning and the target weight of 270 kg, heifers on all treatments conceived at a similar mean weight of 290 kg. Nevertheless, heifers on the low weight-gain treatment had a significantly different relationship of cumulative conceptions to weight, which was confirmed when Cox's proportional hazard model was fitted to the data, using a dummy variable to represent treatment effect.

A Gompertz growth model was fitted to the live weight of each individual animal. A significantly larger mean asymptotic weight was observed for the low weight-gain treatment, which was unrelated to the number of calvings or weanings, or to the total weight of calves weaned per animal. Asymptotic weights were positively correlated with first conception weight and age, both within and across treatments.

The implications of drastic post-weaning undernutrition and continued suboptimal feeding are discussed briefly.

Keywords

Brahmangrowthheifersreproductive performanceunderfeeding
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , August 1991 , pp. 45 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Axelsen, A. and Morley, F. H. W. 1976. The effect of plane of nutrition on reproductive performance of early weaned heifers. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 11: 241–244.Google Scholar
Brockington, N. R., Assis, A. G. de, Martinez, M. L. and Veil, J. M. 1986. A bio-economic modelling project for small-scale milk production systems in South-East Brazil. Part 2. Refinement and use of the model to analyze some short- and long-term management strategies. Agricultural Systems 20: 53–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronson, F. H. and Rissman, E. F. 1986. The biology of puberty. Biological Reviews 60:157–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cajas, G. S., Vera, R. R., Tergas, L. E. and Ayala, H. 1985. Efecto de la carga sobre el crecimiento y manifestación del celo en novillas levantadas en pasturas mejoradas. Pasturas Tropicales Boletín 7: (3), 2–7.Google Scholar
Clanton, D. D., Jones, L. E. and England, M. E. 1983. Effect of rate and time of gain after weaning on the development of replacement beef heifers. Journal of Animal Science 56: 280–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crichton, J. A., Aitken, J. N. and Boyne, A. W. 1959. The effect of plane of nutrition during rearing on growth, production, reproduction and health of dairy cattle. Animal Production 1:145–162.Google Scholar
Dobson, H. and Kamonpatana, M. 1986. A review of female cattle reproduction with special reference to a comparison between buffaloes, cows and zebus. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 77:1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, L. E. and Takken, A. 1968. Effects of nutritional changes on oestrus in heifers. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 7: 180–192.Google Scholar
Foster, D. L. 1988. Puberty in the female sheep. In The physiology of reproduction (ed. Knobil, E.). Raven Press, New York.Google Scholar
Hale, D. H. 1975. Nutrition, hormones and fertility. Rhodesian Agricultural Journal 72: 69–73.Google Scholar
Hoyos, P. and Lascano, C. 1985. Calidad de Brachiaria humidicola en pastoreo en un ecosistema de bosque semisiempre verde estacional. Pasturas Tropicales Boletin 7: (2), 3–5.Google Scholar
Joandet, G. E. and Cartwright, T. C. 1969. Estimation of efficiency of beef production. Journal of Animal Science 29: 862–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnsson, I. D. and Obst, J. M. 1984. The effects of level of nutrition before and after 8 months of age on subsequent milk and calf production of beef heifers over three lactations. Animal Production 38: 57–68.Google Scholar
Joubert, D. M. 1954. The influence of winter nutritional depression on the growth, reproduction and production of cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 44: 5–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joubert, D. M. 1963. Puberty in female farm animals. Animal Breeding Abstracts 31: 295–306.Google Scholar
Kalbfleisch, J. D. and Prentice, R. L. 1980. The statistical analysis of failure time data. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Kirkwood, R. N. and Aherne, F. X. 1985. Energy intake, body composition and reproductive performance of the gilt. Journal of Animal Science 46:1518–1529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkwood, R. N., Cumming, D. C. and Aherne, F. X. 1987. Nutrition and puberty in the female. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 46:177–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kleinheisterkamp, I. and Habich, G. 1985. Colombia: Estudio biologico y tecnico. In Sistemas de production percuaria extensiva: Brasil, Colombia, Venezuela (ed. Vera, R. R. and Sere, C.), pp. 213–278. Centra International Agricultura Tropical, Cali, Colombia.Google Scholar
Nelsen, T. C., Long, C. R. and Cartwright, T. C. 1982. Postinflection growth in straightbred and crossbred cattle. II. Relationships among weight, height and pubertal characteristics. Journal of Animal Science 55: 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penzhorn, E. J. 1975. Wintering levels and reproduction in Afrikaner heifers. Agroanimalia 7: 49–53.Google Scholar
Richardson, F. D. 1983. Short and long-term influences of under-nutrition on range cattle production. Zimbabwe Agricultural Journal 80:175–182.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Wright, I. A. and Hunter, E. A. 1989. Factors affecting reproductive efficiency in beef cows. Animal Production 48: 657–658 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Schillo, K. K., Hansen, P. J., Kanwanja, L. A., Dierschke, D. J. and Hause, L. A. 1983. Influence of season on sexual development in heifers: age at puberty as related to growth and serum concentration of ganadotropins, prolactin, thyroxine and progesterone. Biology of Reproduction 28: 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, R. E. and Bellows, R. A. 1971. Relationships among weight gains, age at puberty and productive performance in heifers. Journal of Animal Science 32:127–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1985. SAS user's guide: statistics, version 5 edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Torres, R. de A., Neto, M. S., Novaes, L. P. and Souza, R. M. de. 1982. Efeito da taxa de lotacao e da suplementacao com silagem no crescimento de bovinos leiteiros em pastagem de capim-gordura. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira 17: 479–488.Google Scholar
Vera, R. R. and Seré, C. 1985. Evaluation of tropical pasture species with a farming system perspective. Proceedings of the International Grassland Congress 15:1187–1188.Google Scholar
Vera, R. R., Seré, C. and Tergas, L. E. 1986. Development of improved grazing systems in the savannas of Tropical America. Proceedings of the Second International Rangeland Congress, Adelaide, Australia, pp. 107–111.Google Scholar
Ward, H. K. and Tiffin, J. de W. 1975. Progress in beef cow productivity. Rhodesia Agricultural Journal 72:1–7.Google Scholar