Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:12:16.366Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on direct measurement of food spillage when growing pigs are given food to appetite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. T. S. Morrow
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR
N. Walker
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR
Get access

Abstract

Ten crossbred boars were penned individually and offered either meal or pellets of identical composition to appetite from single space hopper feeders which also provided water. The hoppers were sited on raised steel mesh platforms 1·2 m × 0·87 m in size under which was placed a similar sized collecting tray. Spilled food was collected for 24 h once weekly for the 4-week experimental period. Live-weight gain tended to be lower on the meal diet compared with the pellets (882 v. 968 (s.e. 28·7); P = 0·07) while food conversion efficiency (g food per g growth) was worse on the meal diet (2·65 v. 241 (s.e. 0·059); P < 0·05). Food spillage is the most likely explanation for the difference in food conversion, however collectable spilled food was (g/g food offered) 0·0089 and 0·0026 respectively of meal and pellets offered. The value for the meal diet is about one-tenth of the expected value and suggests that direct collection of spillage from non-pelleted diets even over a wide area in front of the feeder is not an accurate technique.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anleitner, J., Park, T. F. and Jensen, A. H. 1980. Effect of creep feeder location on feed acceptance by nursing pigs. In 1980 Swine Research Report. University of Illinois at Urgana Champaign.Google Scholar
Baxter, M. R. 1986. The design of the feeding environment for the pig. Ph.D. thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Gill, D. R. 1966. Observation of feed waste by swine. Eighth Annual Swine Short Course Proceedings. Oklahoma State University.Google Scholar
Haer, L. C. M. de, Luiting, P. and Aarts, H. L. M. 1993. Relations among individual (residual) feed intake, growth performance and feed intake pattern of growing pigs in group housing. Livestock Production Science 36: 233253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrow, A. T. S. 1993. Studies on voluntary feed intake of growing pigs with reference to behaviour and efficiency of food utilisation. Ph.D. thesis.The Queen's University of Belfast.Google Scholar
Rowan, T. G. and Lawrence, T. L. J. 1986. Effects on nutritive value for growing pigs of pelleting diets containing low glucosinolate rape seed meals. fournal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107: 735737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoubroek, F. van, Coucke, L. and Spaendonck, R. van 1971. The quantitive effect of pelleting feed on the performance of piglets and fattening pigs. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 41: 19.Google Scholar
Skoch, E. R., Binder, S. F., Deyoe, C. W., Allee, G. L. and Behnke, K. C. 1983. Effects of steam pelleting conditions and extrusion cooking on a swine diet containing wheat middlings. Journal of Animal Science 57: 929935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, N., Donnelly, E., McCracken, K. J. and Morrow, A. T. S. 1993. Improving ad lib feeding for pigs. Occasional publication no. 22, Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland. Hillsborough, Co. Down.Google Scholar
Whittemore, C. T. and Fawcett, R. H. 1976. Theoretical aspects of a flexible model to simulate protein and lipid growth in pigs. Animal Production 22: 8796.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. and Hillyer, G. M. 1984. Feed wastage in flat deck pens. East of Scotland College of Agriculture, Technical note 348A.Google Scholar