Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:32:08.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The post-weaning behaviour of indoor-bred and outdoor-bred pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

S. Webster  and
M. Dawkins
S. Webster*
Affiliation:
Animal Behaviour Research Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
M. Dawkins
Affiliation:
Animal Behaviour Research Group, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
*
†Present address: Elite Consortium Ltd, Stoneleigh Park, Kenilworth CV8 2LG.
Get access

Abstract

The effect of two different lactation environments on the development of pig behaviour was examined at weaning and on days 1, 8, 15 and 57 post weaning. Ten focal indoor-bred pigs and 10 focal outdoor-bred pigs were weaned and mixed together into a group of 60 to 80 mixed indoor- and outdoor-bred pigs. There were six replicate groups. Scans of all focal animals were made using time sampling with a 2-min interval, for 3·0 h immediately following weaning and from 06:00 to 11:00 h on days 1, 8, 15 and 57 post weaning. All pens were straw bedded with two different types of feeder system: one seven-space ad libitum hopper and two rooting-action feeders each accommodating up to four piglets at one time.

From weaning to day 1 post weaning, outdoor-bred pigs were observed to feed more than were indoor-bred pigs (115·6 v. 97·0 observations per pen per day, P < 0·05, s.e.d. = 1·18). From days 8 to 57 post weaning, outdoor-bred pigs were observed to root more than were indoor-bred pigs (22·5 v. 14·7 observations per pen per day, P < 0·05, s.e.d. = 1·22). These findings support the hypothesis that the lactation environment has a significant effect on the behaviour of pigs in their subsequent growing environment. However, such effects appear not to lead to differences in carcass weights, rigor following dressing or carcass blemish at slaughter.

Keywords

pigsbehaviour
Type
Non-ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production
Information
Animal Science , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , October 2000 , pp. 265 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Algers, B. 1984. Early weaning and cage rearing of piglets. Zentralblatt für Veterinärmedizin, Series A 31: 14–24.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1985. Rindside damage scale. Meat and Livestock Commission, Milton Keynes, UK.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1996. Farm Animal Welfare Council: report on the welfare of pigs kept outdoors. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food publication PB2608.Google Scholar
Appleby, M. C., Pajor, E. A. and Fraser, D. 1991. Effects of management options on creep feeding by piglets. Animal Production 53: 361–366.Google Scholar
Arey, D. S. 1991. Tail biting in pigs. Farm Buildings Progress 105: 20–23.Google Scholar
Beattie, V. E., Walker, E. and Sneddon, L. A. 1995. Effects of environmental enrichment on behaviour and productivity of growing pigs. Animal Welfare 4: 207–220.Google Scholar
Chambers, C., Powell, L., Wilson, E. and Green, L. E. 1995. A postal survey of tail biting in pigs in south west England. Veterinary Record 136: 147–148.Google Scholar
Day, J. E. L., Kyriazakis, L and Lawrence, A. B. 1995. The effect of food deprivation on the expression of foraging and exploratory behaviour in the growing pig. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 42: 193–206.Google Scholar
Day, J. E. L., Kyriazakis, I. and Lawrence, A. B. 1996. An investigation into the causation of chewing behaviour in growing pigs: the role of exploratory and feeding motivation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 48: 47–59.Google Scholar
Day, J. E. L., Kyriazakis, I. and Rogers, P. J. 1998. Food choice and intake: towards a unifying framework of learning and feeding motivation. Nutrition Research Reviews 11: 1–19.Google Scholar
De Jonge, F. H., Bokkers, E. A. M., Schouten, W. G. P. and Helmond, F. A. 1996. Rearing piglets in a poor environment: developmental aspects of social stress in pigs. Physiology and Behavior 60: 389–396.Google Scholar
Dybkjaer, L. 1992. The identification of behavioural indicators of “stress” in early weaned piglets. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 35: 135–140.Google Scholar
Fraser, D. 1978. Observations on the behavioural development of suckling and early weaned piglets during the first six weeks after birth. Animal Behaviour 26: 22–30.Google Scholar
Fraser, D. 1987. Attraction to blood as a factor in tail-biting by pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 17: 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lister, D. 1970. The physiology of animals and the use of their muscle for food. In Physiology and biochemistry of muscle as a food, volume 2 (ed. Briskey, E. J., Cassens, R. G. and Marsh, B. B.), pp. 705–730. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar
Pajor, E. A., Fraser, D. and Kramer, D. L. 1991. Consumption of solid food by suckling pigs: individual variation and relation to weight gain. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 32: 139–155.Google Scholar
Schouten, W. G. P. 1986. Rearing conditions and behaviour in pigs. Ph.D. thesis, University of Wageningen. Google Scholar
Sybesma, W. 1966. [Measuring the difference in the occurrence of rigor mortis in hams.] Fleischwirtschaft 46: 637–639.Google Scholar
Van Putten, G. and Dammers, J. 1976. A comparative study of the well-being of piglets reared conventionally and in cages. Applied Animal Ethology 2: 339–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vonesh, E. F. and Chinchilli, V. M. 1997. Linear and non-linear models for the analysis of repeated measures. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
Warriss, P. D. and Bevis, E. A. 1986. Transport and lairage times in British slaughter pigs. British Veterinary Journal 142: 124–130.Google Scholar
Webster, S. D. and Jones, A. R. 1998. Individual variation in the heart rate of piglets: evidence against stable differences. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 55: 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeding, C. M., Hunter, E. J., Guise, H. J. and Penny, R. H. C. 1993. Effects of abattoir and slaughter handling systems on stress indicators in pig blood. Veterinary Record 133: 10–13.Google Scholar
Worsaea, H. and Smidt, M. 1980. Plasma cortisol and behaviour in early weaned piglets. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 21: 640–657.Google Scholar