Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:48:53.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of a deletion approach to assess the amino acid requirements for optimum fermentation by mixed micro-organisms from the sheep rumen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

C. Atasoglu ,
A.Y. Guliye  and
R.J. Wallace
C. Atasoglu*
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9SB, UK
A.Y. Guliye
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9SB, UK
R.J. Wallace*
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB21 9SB, UK
*
†Present address: Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Ürtíversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi, Haijvansal Üretim Bòlümü, 17100 Çanakkale, Turkey.
‡E-mail:RJW@RRI. SARI. AC. UK
Get access

Abstract

Amino acids stimulate the growth rate and growth yield of ruminal micro-organisms, but the basis of this stimulation, in terms of amino acids which most limit growth, has never been fully established. Here, for the first time, a deletion approach was investigated using in vitro incubations of mixed ruminal micro-organisms supplied with a mixture of xylose, starch and cellobiose as energy sources and ammonia plus a complete amino acids mixture or mixtures with a single amino acid omitted as nitrogen sources, enabling the evaluation of the impact on ruminal fermentation of the deletion of a single amino acid from a complete amino acids mixture. Significant effects (P < 0·05) on total gas production were observed after 10 h of incubation when glutamate, glutamine, isoleucine, leucine, phenylalanine, serine, tryptophan or tyrosine were deleted from the amino acids mixture. The only significant effect of an amino acid deletion on volatile fatty acid production at 10 h was with serine (P < 0·05), although the effect of omitting others, including arginine, isoleucine, leucine and phenylalanine, approached significance (P < 0·01). The removal of leucine caused a 0·09 decrease in growth yield (P < 0·05); no other deletion affected the yield significantly (P > 0·05). Net gas production for each treatment was calculated by subtracting gas production in the absence of carbohydrates from gas production in their presence, thus eliminating gas production from amino acids from the values. At all times up to 10 h, the most significant effects on net gas production were found when serine, leucine, or the aromatic amino acids were omitted from the amino acids mixture. Thus, the deletion approach confirmed that no single amino acid limits ruminal fermentation more than any other, although a few, principally phenylalanine, leucine and serine, have a particularly significant rôle in the ruminal fermentation rate of soluble, rapidly degraded materials and/or microbial growth efficiency.

Keywords

amino acidsmicro-organismsrumensheep
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 76 , Issue 1 , February 2003 , pp. 147 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, M.J. 1965. Phenylalanine biosynthesis from phenylacetic acid by anaerobic bacteria from the rumen. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 18: 30–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allison, M.J. 1969. Biosynthesis of amino acids by ruminal microorganisms. Journal of Animal Science 29: 797–807.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allison, M.J., Bryant, M.P. and Doetsch, R.N. 1958. Volatile fatty acid growth factor for cellulolytic cocci of bovine rumen. Science 128: 474–475.Google Scholar
Amos, H.E. and Evans, J. 1976. Supplementary protein for low quality bermudagrass diets and microbial protein synthesis. Journal of Animal Science 43: 861–868.Google Scholar
Argyle, J.L. and Baldwin, R.L. 1989. Effects of amino acids and peptides on rumen microbial growth yields. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 2017–2027.Google Scholar
Atasoglu, C., Valdés, C., Newbold, C.J. and Wallace, R.J. 1999. Influence of peptides and amino acids on fermentation rate and de novo synthesis of amino acids by mixed micro-organisms from the sheep rumen. British Journal of Nutrition 81: 307–314.Google Scholar
Ben-Ghedalia, D., McMeniman, N.P. and Armstrong, D.G. 1978 The effect of partially replacing urea nitrogen with protein N on N capture in the rumen of sheep fed a purified diet. British Journal of Nutrition 39: 37–44.Google Scholar
Bryant, M.P. 1973. Nutritional requirements of the predominant rumen cellulolytic bacteria. Federation Proceedings 32: 1809–1813.Google Scholar
Chen, G., Strobel, H.J., Russell, J.B. and Sniffen, C.J. 1987. Effect of hydrophobicity on utilization of peptides by ruminal bacteria in vitro . Applied and Environmental Microbiology 53: 2021–2025.Google Scholar
Chikunya, S., Newbold, C.J., Rode, L., Chen, X.B. and Wallace, R.J. 1996. Influence of dietary rumen-degradable protein on bacterial growth in the rumen of sheep receiving different energy sources. Animal Feed Science and Technology 63: 333–340.Google Scholar
Cotta, M.A. and Russell, J.B. 1982. Effect of peptides and amino acids on efficiency of rumen bacterial protein synthesis in continuous culture. Journal of Dairy Science 65: 226–234.Google Scholar
Cruz Soto, R., Muhammed, S.A., Newbold, C.J., Stewart, C.S. and Wallace, R.J. 1993. Influence of peptides, amino acids and urea on microbial activity in the rumen of sheep receiving grass hay and on the growth of rumen bacteria in vitro . Animal Feed Science and Technology 49: 151–161.Google Scholar
Fraser, D.L., Ørskov, E.R., Whitelaw, F.G. and Franklin, M.F. 1991. Limiting amino acids in dairy cows given casein as the sole source of protein. Livestock Production Science 28: 235–252.Google Scholar
Harper, A.E. 1959. Sequence in which the amino acids of casein become limiting for the growth of the rat. Journal of Nutrition 67: 109–122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hume, I.D. 1970. Synthesis of microbial protein in the rumen. III. The effect of dietary protein. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 21: 305–314.Google Scholar
Leibholz, J. 1969. Effect of diet on the concentration of free amino acids, ammonia and urea in the rumen liquor and blood plasma of the sheep. Journal of Animal Science 29: 628–634.Google Scholar
McAllan, A.B. 1991. Carbohydrate and nitrogen metabolism in the forestomach of steers given untreated or ammonia treated barley straw diets supplemented with urea or urea plus fishmeal. Animal Feed Science and Technology 33: 195–208.Google Scholar
Maeng, W.J. and Baldwin, R.L. 1976. Factors influencing rumen microbial growth rates and yields: effect of amino acid additions to a purified diet with nitrogen from urea. Journal of Dairy Science 59: 648–655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maeng, W.J., Van Nevel, C.J., Baldwin, R.L. and Morris, J.G. 1976. Rumen microbial growth rates and yields: effect of amino acids and protein. Journal of Dairy Science 59: 68–79.Google Scholar
Merry, R.J., McAllan, A.B. and Smith, RH. 1990. In vitro continuous culture studies on the effect of nitrogen source on microbial growth and fibre digestion. Animal Feed Science and Technology 31:55–64.Google Scholar
Miller, G.L. 1959. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry 31: 426–428.Google Scholar
Oltjen, R.R., Slyter, L.L., Williams, E.E. and Kern, D.L. 1971. Influence of the branched-chain volatile fatty acids and phenylacetate on ruminal microorganisms and nitrogen utilization by steers fed urea and isolated soyprotein. Journal of Nutrition 101: 101–112.Google Scholar
Reis, P.J., Tunks, D.A. and Munro, S.G. 1990. Effects of the infusion of amino acids into the abomasum of sheep, with emphasis on the relative value of methionine, cysteine and homocysteine for wool growth. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 114: 59–68.Google Scholar
Rooke, J.A. and Armstrong, D.G. 1989. The importance of the form of nitrogen on microbial protein synthesis in the rumen of cattle receiving grass silage and continuous intrarumen infusions of sucrose. British Journal of Nutrition 61: 113–121.Google Scholar
Russell, J.B., O’Connor, J.D., Fox, D.G., Van Soest, P.J. and Sniffen, C.J. 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets. 1. Ruminal fermentation. Journal of Animal Science 70: 3551–3561.Google Scholar
Russell, J.B. and Sniffen, C.J. 1984. Effect of carbon-4 and carbon-5 volatile fatty acids on growth of mixed rumen bacteria in vitro . Journal of Dairy Science 67: 987–994.Google Scholar
Salter, D.N., Daneshvar, K. and Smith, R.H. 1979. The origin of nitrogen incorporated into compounds in the rumen bacteria of steers given protein- and urea-containing diets. British Journal of Nutrition 41: 197–209.Google Scholar
Stewart, C.S. and Duncan, S.H. 1985. The effect of avoparcin on cellulolytic bacteria of the ovine rumen. Journal of General Microbiology 131: 427–435.Google Scholar
Storm, E. and Ørskov, E.R. 1984. The nutritive value of rumen micro-organisms in ruminants. 4. The limiting amino acids of microbial protein in growing sheep determined by a new approach. British Journal of Nutrition 52: 613–620.Google Scholar
Stouthamer, A.H. 1973. A theoretical study on the amount of ATP required for synthesis of microbial cell material. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 39: 545–565.Google Scholar
Virtanen, A.I. 1966. Milk production of cows on protein-free feed. Science 153: 1603–1614.Google Scholar
Wallace, R.J. 1979. Effect of ammonia concentration on the composition, hydrolytic activity and nitrogen metabolism of the microbial flora of the rumen. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 47: 443–455.Google Scholar