Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:31:36.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cold housing and computer-controlled milk feeding for dairy calves: behaviour and performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

K. Bøe  and
Ø. Havrevoll
K. Bøe
Affiliation:
Agricultural University of Norway, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Box 5065, 1432 Ås, Norway
Ø. Havrevoll
Affiliation:
Agricultural University of Norway, Department of Animal Science, Box 5025, 1432 Ås, Norway
Get access

Abstract

In each of two experiments, 36 3 to 5-day-old dairy calves (male and female), were allotted to one of three groups: warm housing, milk feeding in teat-buckets twice a day (group 1); warm housing and computer-controlled milk feeding (group 2); and cold housing and computer-controlled milk feeding (group 3). The experiments were conducted from September until February. The daily gain in the first 4 weeks was lower for the calves in group 3 in both experiments and for calves in group 2 in experiment 2 because of lower food intake in this period. This was compensated for by an increased gain later. In spite of the different method of milk feeding, the activity rhythm was nearly equal among groups, but at week 6 and 10 the calves in group 1 spent more time with the head over the feeding table than the calves in the two other groups. The number of unrewarded visits per calf to the milk feeding station decreased from over 30 at week 4 to around 20 shortly before weaning. The frequency of sucking/licking pen-mates was almost negligible in all groups. In order to reduce the heat loss, the frequency of calves lying with body contact clearly increased by decreasing ambient temperature in cold housing.

Keywords

behaviourcalveshousingmilk consumptionthermoregulation
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , October 1993 , pp. 183 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, G. W. 1970. Regulation of food intake in grazing animals. In Physiology of digestion and metabolism in the ruminant (ed. Phillipson, A. T.), pp. 264–276. Oriel Press, Newcastle-upon-Tyne.Google Scholar
Bøe, K. 1986. Forsøk med ulike innrednings-og melkefôringssystemer for kalv. Del 2. Adferd. Norges Landbrukshôgskole, Institutt for byninysteknikk, rapport nr. 238.Google Scholar
Bøe, K. 1990. Thermoregulatory behaviour of sheep housed in insulated and uninsulated buildings. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 27: 243–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, L. R., Autrey, K. M., Herlich, H. and Hawkins, G. E. 1954. Outdoor individual pens compared with conventional housing for raising dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 37: 562–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dybkjær, K., Gregersen, L., Krohn, C. and Konggaard, S. P. 1986. Observationer over Kalves adferd. 2. Perioden 4-56 dage efter fodselen. Statens Husdyrbrugsforsøq, meddelelse nr. 618.Google Scholar
Ferrante, V., Canali, E., Verga, M. and Carenzi, C. 1991. Effects of computerized milk feeder on behaviour and welfare of calves. Proceedings of the international symposium on veal calf production, Wageningen. European Association for Animal Production publication no. 52.Google Scholar
Fiems, L. O., Boucqué, C. V., Cothyn, B. G. and Buysse, F. X. 1981. Effect of feeding techniques and age at weaning on the performances of bucket-fed and suckling reared calves. In Welfare and husbandry of calves (ed. Signoret, J. P.), pp. 149–167. Martinius Nijhoff, The Hague.Google Scholar
Gjestang, K. E. 1983. [Comparison of housing systems for calves, 0-6 months.] Norges landbrukslwgskole, vol. 62, nr. 20.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Jimenez, E. and Blaxter, K. L. 1962. The metabolism and thermal regulation of calves in the first month of life. British journal of Nutrition 16: 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, B., Verhagen, N. and Sambraus, H. H. 1989. [Reduction of substitute sucking in artificially reared calves by retraining after feeding or prolongation of sucking time.] Zuchtungskunde 61: 384–400.Google Scholar
Hafez, E. S. E. and Lineweaver, L. A. 1968. Suckling behaviour in natural and artificially fed neonate calves. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie 25: 187–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hansen, K. 1984. Klimaforsøg med kalve, isolering — ventilering — varme. Statens jordbrugstekniske forsøg, beretning nr. 21.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, J. A. and Jansen, J. 1986. Statistical significance in comparative ethological experiments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 16: 303–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illes, A., Horwath, S. and Kishonti, L. 1981. Examinations on the reasons of and prevention from abnormal sucking of cattle. Allattenyésztes es takármdnyozás, tom. 30, no. 5.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, L. J., Jorgensen, N. A., Schingoethe, D. J. and Owens, M. J. 1970. Indoor versus outdoor calf rearing at three weaning ages. Journal of Dairy Science 53: 813–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kittner, M. and Kurz, H. 1967. Ein Bertrag zur Frage des Verhaltens der Kälber unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Scheinsaugens. Archiv für Tierzucht 10: 41–60.Google Scholar
Kjølsvik, M. and Bøe, K. 1988. Dataprogram for behandling og analyse av forsøksdata og data fra adferdsstudier. Norges Landbrukshøgskole, Institutt for byningsteknikk, rapport nr. 251.Google Scholar
Kunz, P. and Montandon, G. 1983. Kälberhaltung konventionell und im Kaltstall. FAT Blätter fiir handtechnik 233.Google Scholar
Larsen, H. J., Tenpaas, G. H. and Cramer, C. O. 1980. Rearing dairy calves in warm and cold housing. Journal of Dairy Science 63: suppl. 1, pp. 72–73.Google Scholar
McKnight, D. R. 1978. Performance of newborn dairy calves in hutch housing. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 58: 517–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mees, A. M. F. and Metz, J. H. M. 1984. Saugverhalten von Kälbern — Bedürfnis und Befriedigung bei verschiedenen Tränksystemen. In Aktuelle Arbeiten zur artgemäβen Tierhältung 1983. KTBL-Schrift 299: 82–94.Google Scholar
Metz, J. H. M. and Mekking, P. 1986. Reizqualitäten als Auslöser bei Kälbern. In Aktuelle Arbeiten zur artgemäβen Tierhaltung 1986. KTBL-Schrift 319: 228–237.Google Scholar
Mount, L. E. 1960. The influence of huddling and body size on the metabolic rate of the young pig. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 55: 101–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirkelmann, H., Stanzel, H. and Wendling, F. 1985. Automatisierte Versorgung und Kontrolle von Aufzuchtund Mastkälbern. Grundlagen der Landtechnik 35:(3), 89–95.Google Scholar
Roy, J. H. B. 1990. The calf. 5th ed. Volume 1. Management and health. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Scücs, E., Molnar, I., Weber, A., Szöllosi, I. and Kishonti, L. 1977. Influence of feeding liquid milk replacer from open pail and through nipple pail to dairy calves reared artificially on performance, nutritional behaviour and undesirable habit of cross sucking. CIGR, section II, seminar on agricultural buildings, Ås, Norway, pp. 155–166.Google Scholar
Webster, J. 1984. Calf husbandry, health and welfare. Granada, London.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F., Gordon, J. G. and McGregor, R. 1978. The cold tolerance of beef and dairy type calves in the first weeks of life. Animal Production 26: 85–92.Google Scholar
Webster, A. J. F., Saville, C., Church, B. M., Gnanasakthy, A. and Moss, R. 1985. The effect of different rearing systems on the development of calf behaviour. British Veterinary journal 141: 249–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilt, J. G. de. 1985. Behaviour and welfare of veal calves in relation to husbandry systems. Instituut voor mechanisatie, arbeid en gebouwen, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Zipper, J. 1965. Gruppenhaltung der Saugkälber. Tierzucht 19:258–261.Google Scholar