Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T23:22:53.243Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differences in microbial fermentation of barley straw induced by its treatment with anhydrous ammonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

M. Fondevila ,
G. Muñoz ,
C. Castrillo ,
F. Vicente  and
S. M. Martín-Orúe
M. Fondevila
Affiliation:
Departmento de Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Universidad de Zaragoza, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain
G. Muñoz
Affiliation:
Departmento de Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Universidad de Zaragoza, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain
C. Castrillo
Affiliation:
Departmento de Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Universidad de Zaragoza, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain
F. Vicente
Affiliation:
Departmento de Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Universidad de Zaragoza, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain
S. M. Martín-Orúe
Affiliation:
Departmento de Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, Universidad de Zaragoza, Miguel Servet 177, 50013 Zaragoza, Spain
Get access

Abstract

The effect of ammonia treatment of straw on both the rumen environment and the extent of its microbial fermentation was studied. Four rumen cannulated sheep were randomly given 700 g/day of untreated straw plus urea (US), ammonia-treated straw (TS) and alfalfa hay (AH) in a change-over design with three periods. Rumen pH was lower and ammonia-nitrogen and total volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations were higher (P < 0·001) with AH than with US or TS. With the straw diets, TS promoted a lower pH than US (P < 0·05), but differences were less than 0·3 units and the mean pH was never below 6·5. There were no differences between the straw diets in ammonia-nitrogen or VFA concentration (P > 0·05). When untreated barley straw (BS) and treated straw (TS) were incubated in situ disappearance of dry matter (dDM) at 12, 24 and 48 h (P < 0·01) and neutral-detergent fibre (dNDF) at 48 h (P < 0·001) were higher with TS. In vitro incubation showed a higher gas production with TS only after 36 h (P < 0·05) whereas gas from BS fermentation was higher up to 14 h (P < 0·05). Among diets, dDM, dNDF and gas production with US were numerically higher than with TS or AH throughout, although few significant differences were observed, except for a higher dDM at 12 (P < 0·01) and 24 (P < 0·10) h and a higher dNDF at 12 h (P < 0·10). Particle-associated enzymes were extracted from BS and TS incubated in the rumen for 4, 8, 22 and 24 h. Results ofxylanase and cellulase activities support those of straw incubation, with a drop between 4 and 8 h in TS diet. The concentration of residual phenolics per unit of incubated straws after 12 and 24 h show that phenolics release to the media was higher with the TS diet. Daily changes of phenolic concentration into rumen liquid was also higher with TS than with US (P < 0·001). The increased release of straw phenolics by ammoniation reduced the potential for rumen degradation of straw, mainly in the first hours of the fermentation period.

Keywords

ammonia treatmentmicrobial fermentationphenolic compoundsstraw
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , August 1997 , pp. 111 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akin, D. E., Rigsby, L. L., Theodorou, M. K. and Hartley, R. D. 1988. Population changes of fibrolytic rumen bacteria in the presence of phenolic acids and plant extracts. Animal Feed Science and Technology 19: 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1980. Official methods of analysis, 13th edition. George Banta Co., Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Balcells, J., Fondevila, M., Guada, J. A., Castrillo, C. and Surra, J. C. E. 1993. Urinary excretion of purine derivatives and nitrogen in sheep given straw supplemented with different sources of carbohydrates. Animal Production 57: 287–292.Google Scholar
Borneman, W. S., Akin, D. E. and Van Eseltine, W. P. 1986. Effect of phenolic monomers on ruminal bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 52:1331–1339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cann, I. K. O., Kobayashi, Y., Wakita, M. and Hoshino, S. 1991. Digestion properties of ammoniated rice straw in the rumen and lower tract of sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 35: 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castrillo, C.Fondevila, M., Guada, J. A. and Vega, A. 1995. Effect of ammonia treatment and carbohydrate supplementation on the intake and digestibility of barley straw diets by sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 51: 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesson, A. 1981. Effect of sodium hydroxide on cereal straws in relation to enhanced degradation of structural polysaccharides by rumen microorganisms. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 32: 745–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulphy, J. P., Komar, A. and Zwaenepoel, P. 1984. Effects compares des traitements a l'ammoniac et a la soude sur la valeur alimentaire de fourrages pauvres. Annales de Zootechnie 33: 321–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firkins, J. L., Bowman, J. G. P., Weiss, W. P. and Naderer, J. 1991. Effects of protein, carbohydrate and fat sources on bacterial colonization and degradation of fiber in vitro. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 4273–4283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fondevila, M., Castrillo, C.Gasa, J. and Guada, J. A. 1993. Effect of ammonia treatment of barley straw on the dynamics of its degradation in the rumen. Animal Production 57: 407–413.Google Scholar
Fondevila, M., Castrillo, C.Guada, J. A. and Balcells, J. 1994. Effect of ammonia treatment and carbohydrate supplementation of barley straw on rumen liquid characteristics and substrate degradation by sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 50:137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenet, E. and Barry, P. 1990. Microbial degradation in the rumen of wheat straw and anhydrous ammonia treated wheat straw observed by electron microscopy. Animal Feed Science and Technology 30: 533–540.Google ScholarPubMed
Hiltner, P. and Dehority, B. A. 1983. Effect of soluble carbohydrates on digestion of cellulose by pure cultures of rumen bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 46: 642–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jouany, J. P. 1982. Volatile fatty acid and alcohol determination in digestive contents, silage juices, bacterial cultures and anaerobic fermentor contents. Science des Aliments 2: 131–144.Google Scholar
Jung, H.-J. G., Fahey, G. C. and Merchen, N. R. 1983. Effects of ruminant digestion and metabolism on phenolic monomers of forages. British Journal of Nutrition 50: 637–651.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kabré, P., Martin, C. and Michalet-Doreau, B. 1994. Enzyme activities of solid-adherent microorganisms in chronically underfed ewes. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 65:423–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khazaal, K., Boza, J. and Ørskov, E. R. 1994. Assessment of phenolics-related antinutritive effects in Mediterranean browse: a comparison between the use of the in vitro gas production technique with or without insoluble polyvinylpolypyrrolidone or nylon bag. Animal Feed Science and Technology 49: 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolankaya, N., Stewart, C. S., Duncan, S. H., Cheng, K. J. and Costerton, J. W. 1985. The effect of ammonia treatment on the solubilisation of straw and the growth of cellulolytic bacteria. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 58: 371–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondo, T., Ushita, T. and Kyuma, T. 1994. Comparison of phenolic acids in lignin fractions from forage grasses before and after digestion by sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology 47: 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, M. M. and Van Soest, P. J. 1981. Titratable groups and soluble phenolic compounds as indicators of the digestibility of chemically treated roughages. Animal Feed Science and Technology 6:123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, J. E., Ternrud, I. E. and Theander, O. 1984. Degradation rate and chemical composition of different types of alkali-treated straws during rumen digestion. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 35: 500–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manyuchi, B., Ørskov, E. R. and Kay, R. B. N. 1992. Effects of feeding small amounts of ammonia treated straw on degradation and rate and intake of untreated straw. Animal Feed Science and Technology 38: 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, V. C., Hartley, R. D., Keene, A. S. and Cobby, J. M. 1988. The effect of ammoniation on the nutritive value of wheat, barley and oat straws. 1. Changes in chemical composition in relation to digestibility in vitro add cell wall degradability. Animal Feed Science and Technology 19: 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menke, K. H. and Steingass, H. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development 28: 7–55.Google Scholar
Mes-Hartree, M. and Saddler, J. N. 1983. The nature of inhibitory material present in pretreated lignocellulosic substrates which inhibit the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnology Letters 5: 531–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, A. T. and Ørskov, E. R. 1988. Fibre degradation in the rumen of animals receiving hay, untreated or ammonia-treated straw. Animal Feed Science and Technology 19: 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, A. T., Wallace, R. J. and Ørskov, E. R. 1987. Use of particle-bound microbial enzyme activity to predict the rate and extent of fibre degradation in the rumen. British journal of Nutrition 57: 407–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Southgate, D. A. T. 1991. Determination of food carbohydrates. Second edition. Elsevier Applied Science, Barking, Essex.Google Scholar
Theodorou, M. K., Gascoyne, D. J., Akin, D. E. and Hartley, R. D. 1987. Effect of phenolic acids and phenolics from plant cell walls on rumenlike fermentation in consecutive batch culture. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 53: 1046–1050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. and Lewis, B. A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74: 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varel, V. H. and Jung, H. J. G. 1986. Influence of forage phenolics on ruminal fibrolytic bacteria and in vitro fiber degradation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 52: 275–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, B. A., Van der Poel, A. F. B., Boer, H. and Tamminga, S. 1995. The use of cumulative gas production to determine the effect of steam explosion on the fermentability of two substrates with different cell wall quality. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 69: 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorrilla-Ríos, J., Owens, F. N., Horn, G. W. and McNew, R. W. 1985. Effect of ammoniation of wheat straw on performance and digestion kinetics in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 60: 814–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar