Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:48:02.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of body condition and energy utilization on the length of post-partum anoestrus in PRID-treated and untreated post-partum Bos indicus (Zebu) cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

E. Mukasa-Mugerwa ,
D. Anindo ,
A. Lahlou-Kassi ,
N. N. Umunna  and
A. Tegegne
E. Mukasa-Mugerwa
Affiliation:
Animal Reproduction and Health Section
D. Anindo
Affiliation:
Animal Nutrition and Management Section
A. Lahlou-Kassi
Affiliation:
Animal Reproduction and Health Section
N. N. Umunna
Affiliation:
Debre Zeit Animal Production Research Station International Livestock Research Institute, PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
A. Tegegne
Affiliation:
Debre Zeit Animal Production Research Station International Livestock Research Institute, PO Box 5689, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Get access

Abstract

Forty-five Bos indicus (zebu) cows were blocked by body condition (BC) score at calving and allocated by body weight (BW) to three treatments: untreated controls (CON), and progesterone-releasing intra-vaginal device (PRID)-treated at either 45 (T45) or 60 days (T60) post partum. Cows were given food individually and blood-sampled three times a week for progesterone. Calves sucked twice a day and were weighed weekly. PRIDs resulted in only 21% of cows responding at 60 days and they did not reduce anoestrus (PPI) or calving interval (CI) (P > 0·05). Dry matter (DM) and metabolizable energy (ME) intake were 7·1 (s.e. 0·6) kg and 54·3 (s.e. 4·6) MJ/day, respectively. BC score and BW at calving, and ME intake influenced cow and calf average daily gain ranging from −580 to 625 and 331 to 868 g/day, respectively. Milk yield during the first 4 months was 507 (s.e. 97) l. Cows gained 25 kg per unit increase in condition but lost 50 kg for a unit decline. CI (mean 14·2, range 10 to 24 months) was inversely related to BC score at calving (r = −0·31) and was delayed by a long PPI (r = 0·51), ranging from 38 to 297 days. Most (95%) cows experienced one or more ‘silent ovulations’ before first oestrus, the number extending PPI length (r = 0·49, P < 0·001). Efficiency of ME utilization was higher for smaller cows of 240 (s.e. 28) kg at calving. It is concluded that: (1) PRID treatment before 60 days post partum is unlikely to reduce anoestrus in Boran zebu cattle; (2) given adequate energy intake zebu cattle in thin condition at calving initially replenish body reserves at the cost of lactation and experience more ‘silent’ ovarian activity before returning to oestrus; (3) cows in good condition at calving express maximum lactation potential, mobilizing their own body reserves to support milk production, yet resume oestrous activity earlier despite weight losses to support higher milk yields.

Keywords

body conditionenergy intakelactationreproductionzebu
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , August 1997 , pp. 17 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alberro, M. and Haile-Mariam, S. 1982. The indigenous cattle of Ethiopia. Part I. World Animal Review 41:2–10.Google Scholar
Bergfeld, E. G., Kojima, F. N., Wehrman, M. E., Cupp, A. S., Peters, K. E., Mariscal, V., Sanchez, T., Kittok, R. J., Garcia-Winder, M. and Kinder, J. E. 1995. Frequency of luteinizing hormone pulses and circulating 17β-oestradiol concentration in cows is related to concentration of progesterone in circulation when the progesterone comes from either an endogenous or exogenous source. Animal Reproduction Science 37: 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britt, J. H. 1985. Enhanced reproduction and its economic importance, Journal of Dairy Science 68:1585–1592.Google Scholar
Butler, W. R., Everett, R. W. and Coppock, C. E. 1981. The relationship between energy balance, milk production and ovulation in postpartum Holstein cattle. Journal of Animal Science 53:742–748.Google Scholar
Butler, W. R. and Smith, R. D. 1989. Interrelationship between energy balance and postpartum reproductive function in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 72:767–783.Google Scholar
Dzuik, P. J. and Bellows, R. A. 1983. Management of reproduction of beef cattle, sheep and pigs. Journal of Animal Science 57: (suppl. 2) 355–379.Google Scholar
Eldon, J. and Olafsson, T. 1988. Assessment of the postpartum reproductive performance of the Icelandic dairy cow during a three year period. Ada Veterinaria Scandinavica 29:385–392.Google Scholar
Haresign, W. 1980. Body condition, milk yield and reproduction in cattle. In Recent advances in animal nutrition (ed. Haresign, W. and Lewis, D.), pp. 107–122. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Holness, D. H., Hopley, J. D. H. and Hale, D. H. 1978. The effects of plane of nutrition, live weight, temporary weaning and breed on the occurrence of oestrus in beef cows during the post-partum period. Animal Production 26: 47–54.Google Scholar
Houghton, P. L., Lemanager, R. P., Horstman, L. A., Hendrix, K. S. and Moss, G. E. 1990. Effects of body composition, pre- and post-partum energy level and early weaning on reproductive performance of beef cows and preweaning calf gain. Journal of Animal Science 68: 1438–1446.Google Scholar
International Livestock Centre for Africa. 1987. ILCA's strategy and long-term plan. International Livestock Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Laflamme, L. F. and Connor, M. L. 1992. Effect of postpartum nutrition and cow body condition at parturition on subsequent performance of beef cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 72:843–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McSweeney, C. S., Fitzpatrick, L. A., D'Occhio, M. J., Reid, D. and Entwistle, K. E. 1993. Reducing postpartum anoestrus interval in first-calf Bos indicus crossbred beef heifers. I. Effects of pre- and post-partum supplementation strategies. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44: 1063–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1987. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Mukasa-Mugerwa, E. 1989. The reproductive performance of female Bos indicus (Zebu) Cattle. Monograph no. 6. International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Mukasa-Mugerwa, E., Tegegne, A. and Ketema, H. 1991. Patterns of postpartum oestrus onset and associated plasma progesterone profiles in Bos indicus cows in Ethiopia. Animal Reproduction Science 24: 73–84.Google Scholar
Mukasa-Mugerwa, E., Tegegne, A., Mattoni, M. and Cecchini, G. 1989. Effects of oestrous synchronisation with prostaglandin F2α in Ethiopian highland Zebu (Bos indicus) cows. Animal Production 48:367–373.Google Scholar
Nicholson, M. J. and Butterworth, M. H. 1986. A guide to condition scoring of Zebu cattle. International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Randel, R. D. 1990. Nutrition and postpartum rebreeding in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 68: 853–862.Google Scholar
Rhind, S. M., McMillen, S. and McKelvey, W. A. C. 1991. Effects of level of food intake and body condition on the sensitivity of the hypothalamus and pituitary to ovarian steroid feedback in ovariectomized ewes. Animal Producion 52:115–125.Google Scholar
Richards, M. W., Spitzer, J. C. and Warner, M. B. 1986. Effect of varying levels of pastpartum nutrition and body condition at calving on subsequent reproductive performance in beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 62: 300–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, M. S., Stumpf, T. T., Wolfe, M. W., Kittok, R. J. and Kinder, J. E. 1991. Influence of direction of weight change on pattern of gonadotropin secretion in ovariectomised beef heifers of equivalent body weight. Journal of Animal Science 69:1616–1625.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J. 1990. Nutrition in the reproduction of farm animals. Nutrition Research Reviews 3: 253–276.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1988. SAS/STAT user's guide: statistics, release 6.03 edition, pp. 549–640. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Y., Vincent, D. L., Ledgerwood, K. S. and Weems, C. W. 1995. Variable progesterone response and estradiol secretion in prepubertal beef heifers following treatment with norgestomet implants. Theriogenology 43: 1077–1086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terqui, M., Chupin, D., Gauthier, D., Perez, N., Pelor, J. and Mauleon, P. 1982. Influence of management and postpartum endocrine function and ovarian activity in cows. In Factors influencing fertility in the postpartum cow (ed. Karg, H. and Schallenberger, E.). Current Topics in Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science 20: 384–408.Google Scholar
Villa-Godoy, A., Hughes, T. L., Emery, R. S., Chapin, L. T. and Fogwell, R. L. 1988. Association between energy balance and luteal function in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 71: 1063–1072.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, H. K. 1968. Supplementation of beef cows grazing on veld. Rhodesian Journal of Agricultural Research 6:93–101.Google Scholar
Wright, I. A., Rhind, S. M., Russel, A. J. F., Whyte, T. K., McBean, A. J. and McMillen, S. R. 1987. Effects of body condition, food intake and temporary calf separation on the duration of the post-partum anoestrous period and associated LH, FSH and prolactin concentrations in beef cows. Animal Production 45:395–402.Google Scholar
Wright, I. A., Rhind, S. M., Whyte, T. K. and Smith, A. J. 1992. Effects of body condition at calving and feeding level after calving on LH profiles and duration of the post-partum anoestrous period in beef cows. Animal Production 55:41–46.Google Scholar
Wright, I. A. and Russel, A. J. F. 1984. Partition of fat, body composition and body condition score in mature cows. Animal Production 38:23–32.Google Scholar