Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:11:25.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of diet on amino acid composition of soft faeces and the contribution of soft faeces to total amino acid intake, through caecotrophy in lactating doe rabbits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

N. Nicodemus
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal, ETS Ingenieros Agrónomos, Universidad Politécnica, 28040 Madrid, Spain
J. Mateos
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal, ETS Ingenieros Agrónomos, Universidad Politécnica, 28040 Madrid, Spain
J. C. de Blas
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal, ETS Ingenieros Agrónomos, Universidad Politécnica, 28040 Madrid, Spain
R. Carabaño
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal, ETS Ingenieros Agrónomos, Universidad Politécnica, 28040 Madrid, Spain
M. J. Fraga
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal, ETS Ingenieros Agrónomos, Universidad Politécnica, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Get access

Abstract

Twenty-five New Zealand White × Californian lactating doe rabbits were used to study the effect of different dietary fibre concentrations on the amino acid contribution of soft faeces to the total amino acid intake. Five isoenergetic diets containing 312, 334, 360, 384, and 412 g/kg neutral-detergent fibre (DM basis) were formulated. All diets were designed to maintain the same amino acid pattern. Soft faeces production showed a trend to increase (P = 0·07) as dietary fibre increased. The content of isoleucine (P < 0·01), glutamic acid, leucine and alanine (P < 0·05) in soft faeces decreased as the dietary fibre increased. A trend to decrease with the increase of dietary fibre was also observed for aspartic acid (P = 0·06), lysine (P = 0·07), methionine and valine (P = 0·1). As a consequence, the soft faeces contribution to the total intake of individual amino acids did not vary with the type of diet. The average contribution of soft faeces to the total amino acid intake for the most limiting amino acids of lactating doe rabbits under practical conditions, methionine, threonine and lysine, were 0·17 , 0·21 and 0·18 g/g, respectively.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1984. Official methods of analysis, 14th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
Blas, J. C. de, Taboada, E., Mateos, G.C., Nicodemus, N. and Méndez, J. 1995. Effect of substitution of starch for fibre and fat in isoenergetic diets on nutrient digestibility and reproductive performance of rabbits. Journal of Animal Science 73: 11311137.Google ScholarPubMed
Bias, J. C. de, Taboada, E., Nicodemus, N., Campos, R., Piquer, J. and Méndez, J. 1998. Performance response of lactating and growing rabbits to dietary threonine content. Animal Feed Science and Technology 70: 151160.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. A., Meys, M. and Tarvin, T. L. 1989. The pico.tag method. In A manual of advanced techniques for amino acid analysis. Millipore Corporation, Bedford, UK.Google Scholar
European Economic Community. 1972. Analytical determination of starch. EEC. Official Journal of European Community L 123,7.Google Scholar
García, J. 1997. Efecto de la niente de fibra sobre la digestión en el conejo. Tesis doctoral, Universidad Politécnica, Madrid.Google Scholar
García, J., Blas, J. C. de, Carabano, R. and García, P. 1995a. Effect of type of lucerne hay on caecal fermentation and nitrogen contribution through caecotrophy in rabbits. Reproduction, Nutrition, Development 35: 267275.Google ScholarPubMed
Garcia, J., Pérez-Alba, L., Alvarez, C., Rocha, R., Ramos, M. and Blas, J. C. de. 1995b. Prediction of the nutritive value of lucerne hay in diets for growing rabbits. Animal Feed Science and Technology 54: 3344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goering, H. K. and Van Soest, P. J. 1970. Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications). USDA agricultural handbook no. 379. ARS, USD A, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Lorente, M., Fraga, M. J., Carabano, R. and Blas, J. C. de. 1988. Coprophagy in lactating does fed different diets. journal of Applied Rabbit Research 11: 1115.Google Scholar
Proto, V. 1976. Fisiologia della nutrizione del coniglio con particolare riguardo alla ciecotrofia. Rivista di Coniglicoltura 7: 1533.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. B. and Van Soest, P. J. 1981. The detergent system of analysis and its application to human foods. In The analysis of dietary fiber in foods (ed. James, W. P. T. and Theander, O.), pp. 123158. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1990. SAS/STAT user’s guide, version 6. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Xiccato, G. 1996. Nutrition of lactating does. Proceedings of the sixth world rabbit congress (ed. Lebas, F.), pp. 2947. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Toulouse.Google Scholar
Yoshida, T., Pleasants, J. R., Reddy, B. and Wostmann, B. S. 1971. Amino acid composition of caecal contents and faeces in germfree and conventional rabbits. Journal of Nutrition 101: 14231429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar