Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:33:51.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of digestible undergradable protein (DUP) content of concentrates on colostrum production and lamb performance of triplet-bearing ewes on grass-based diets during late pregnancy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

R. W. Annett ,
A. F. Carson  and
L. E. R. Dawson
R. W. Annett*
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Large Park, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR, UK
A. F. Carson
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Large Park, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR, UK Queen's University of Belfast and Rural Development, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK Department of Agriculture and Rural Development, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK
L. E. R. Dawson
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Large Park, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR, UK
*
†E-mail: ronaldannett@yahoo.co.uk
Get access

Abstract

An experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of increasing the digestible undegradable protein (DUP) concentration of concentrates on colostrum production and lamb output from prolific ewe breed types. Sixty triplet-bearing ewes with a mean condition score of 3.75 were allocated to one of five treatments (no. =; 12) for the final 6 weeks of pregnancy. Four of the treatments were offered a restricted grass diet (0.6 kg dry matter (DM) per day) plus one of four isoenergetic and isonitrogenous concentrates (0.56 kg DM per day) that were formulated to provide 25 (P25); 40 (P40); 75 (P75) and 95 (P95) g DUP/kg DM. Control ewes were offered a grass-only diet with the aim of achieving an equivalent total DM intake (1.16 kg DM per day). Concentrate composition had no effect on total diet DM, crude protein or metabolizable energy intakes, but the intake of DUP increased with increasing concentrate DUP level (P < 0.001). Supplementing grass with concentrates led to significant reductions in plasma β-hydroxybutyrate (P < 0.05) and non-esterified fatty acids(P < 0.001) concentrations. Plasma urea concentration tended to be negatively and linearly related to the concentrate DUP level (P < 0.1). Colostrum production and composition were not affected by concentrate type, except for the concentration of gross energy which was highest for P40 ewes. Concentrate feeding led to significant (P < 0.05) increases in colostrum yield 18 h post lambing and colostral outputs of ash, crude protein, total solids and gross energy but resulted in a lower (P < 0.05) colostral immunoglobulin G concentration. Lamb birth weight and total litter weight were not affected by late pregnancy feeding regime. However lamb survival to weaning was reduced significantly (P < 0.05) for P25 and control ewes, resulting in lower levels of lamb output at weaning. The results from this study indicate that offering rumen undegradable rather than rumen degradable protein has no effect on colostrum production and lamb performance when ewes are offered high quality grass-based diets in late pregnancy.

Keywords

colostrumeweslamb survivalprotein intake
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 80 , Issue 1 , February 2005 , pp. 101 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. An advisory manual prepared by the AFRC Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Bell, A. W. and Bauman, D. E. 1997. Adaptations of glucose metabolism during pregnancy and lactation. Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia 2: 265–278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Black, J. L. 1983. Growth and development of lambs. In Sheep production(ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 21–58. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Boever, J. L. de, Iantcheva, N., Cottyn, B. G., Campeneere, S. de, Fiems, L. O. and Boucquŕ, Ch., U. 1998. Microbial protein synthesis in growing-finishing bulls estimated from the urinary excretion of purine derivatives. Animal Feed Science and Technology 75: 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brambell, F. W. R. 1970. The transmission of passive immunity from mother to young. In Frontiers of biology, vol. 18, p. 166. North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Brown, S. A., Dusza, K. and Boehmer, J. 1994. Comparison of measured and calculated values for colloid osmotic pressure in hospitilized animals. American Journal of Veterinary Research 55: 910–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, A. F., Dawson, L. E. R. and Laidlaw, A. S. 2003. Effect of herbage allowance and concentrate feed level offered to ewes in late pregnancy on ewe and lamb performance. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 2003, p. 63 (abstr.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. B., Chen, Y. K., Franklin, M. F., Ørskov, E. R. and Shand, W. J. 1992. The effect of feed intake and body weight on purine derivative excretion and microbial protein supply in sheep. Journal of Animal Science 70: 1534–1542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dawson, L. E. R., Carson, A. F. and Kilpatrick, D. J. 1999. The effect of digestible undegradable protein concentration of concentrates and protein source offered to ewes in late pregnancy on colostrum production and lamb performance. Animal Feed Science and Technology 82: 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doney, J. M., Peart, J. N., Smith, W. F. and Louda, F. 1979. A consideration of the techniques for estimation of milk yield and a comparison of estimates obtained by two methods in relation to effect of breed, level of production and stage of lactation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92: 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahey, J. L. and McKelvey, E. M. 1965. Quantitative determination of serum immunoglobulins in antibody-agar plates. Journal of Immunology 94: 84–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forbes, J. M. 1970. The voluntary intake of pregnant and lactating ruminants: a review. British Veterinary Journal 126: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, D. G., Piper, L. R., Egan, A. R. and Bindon, B. M. 1992. Lamb and milk production from Booroola ewes supplemented in late pregnancy. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 32: 587–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holst, P. J. 1987. Supplementary feeding of oat grain or lucerne hay to crossbred ewes at lambing. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 27: 211–216.Google Scholar
Khalaf, A. M., Doxey, D. L., Baxter, J. T., Black, W. J. M., Fitzsimons, J. and Ferguson, J. A. 1979. Late pregnancy ewe feeding and lamb performance in early life. 2. Factors associated with perinatal lamb mortality. Animal Production 29: 401–410.Google Scholar
Kleemann, D. O., Walker, S. K., Walkley, J. R. W., Smith, D. H., Grimson, R. J., Stafford, J. E. and Seamark, R. F. 1988. The effect of nutrition during mid and late pregnancy on lamb birth weight and survival in F + Booroola × S. A. Merino ewes. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 17: 428 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 2002. Genstat 6, version 6 1. Rothamsted Experiment Station, Harpenden.Google Scholar
Ling, E. R. 1963. A textbook of dairy chemistry, volume. 2. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
McMurray, C. H., Blanchflower, W. J. and Rice, D. A. 1984. Automated kinetic method for D-3-hydroxybutyrate in plasmas or serum. Clinical Chemistry 30: 421–425.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. M., Slepetis, R., Erhardt, R. A., Smith, D. M. and Bell, A. W. 1994. Protein requirements in late pregnancy: partitioning of nitrogen between conceptus and maternal tissues. Proceedings of the nutrition conference for feed manufacturers, p. 117 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Mehrez, A. Z. and Ørskov, E. R. 1977. A study of the arti. cial. bre bag technique for determining the digestibility of feeds in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88: 645–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, D. J. and Cockburn, F. 1986. A comparison of energy metabolism in the new-born infant, piglet and lamb. Quaterly Journal of Experimental Physiology 71: 361–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellor, D. J. and Murray, L. 1985. Effects of maternal nutrition on the availability of energy in the body reserves of fetuses at term and in colostrum from Scottish Blackface ewes with twin lambs. Research in Veterinary Science 39: 235–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Doherty, J. V. and Crosby, T. F. 1997. The effect of diet in late pregnancy on colostrum production and immunoglobulin absorption in sheep. Animal Science 64: 87–96.Google Scholar
O'Doherty, J. V. and Crosby, T. F. 1998. Blood metabolite concentrations in late pregnant ewes as indicators of nutritional status. Animal Science 66: 675–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oldham, J. D., Buttery, P. J., Swan, H. and Lewis, D. 1977. Interactions between dietary carbohydrate and nitrogen digestion in sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89: 467–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. and McDonald, P. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighed according to rates of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92: 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. and Robinson, J. J. 1981. The application of modern concepts of ruminant protein nutrition to sheep production systems. Livestock Production Science 8: 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pattinson, S.E., Davies, D. A. R. and Winter, A. C. 1995. Changes in the secretion rate and production of colostrum by ewes over the first 24 h post partum. Animal Science 61: 63–68.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J. 1983. Nutrition of the pregnant ewe. In Sheep production(ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 111–131. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J. 1990. Nutrition over the winter period – the breeding female. In New developments in sheep production(ed. Slade, C. F. R. and Lawrence, T. F. R.), British Society of Animal Production occasional publication no. 14, pp. 55–69.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J. and McDonald, I. 1989. Ewe nutrition, foetal growth and development. In Reproduction, growth and nutrition in sheep(ed. Dyrmundsson, O. R. and Thorgeirsson, S.), pp. 57–77. Agricultural Research Institute and Agricultural Society of Iceland, Reykjavik.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Doney, J. M. and Gunn, R. G. 1969. Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72: 451–454.Google Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. 1986. The effect of plane of nutrition and type of diet offered to yearling Friesian steers during a winter store period on subsequent performance. Animal Production 42: 29–37.Google Scholar
Visek, W. J. 1984. Ammonia: its effects on biological systems, metabolic hormones and reproduction. Journal of Dairy Science 67: 481–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed