Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:32:58.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of food intake capacity on production traits in growing pigs with restricted feeding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

E. Kanis
E. Kanis
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Breeding, Wageningen Agricultural University, PO Box 338, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

Effects of food intake (FI) and ad libitum food intake capacity (FIC) were investigated in 438 pigs fed in seven batches. Batches 1 to 6 consisted of barrows and batch 7 of gilts. Restrictedly fed animals had one to three ad libitum fed litter mates. In batches 6 and 7, animals were fed ad libitum until 48 kg live weight. Thereafter, two-thirds of the animals were fed according to a fixed weight scale. FIC is considered as a trait of the animal, independent of its actual FI. With ad libitum feeding FIC can be measured directly, with restricted feeding FIC has to be estimated.

Two methods of estimating average FIC from about 27 to 107 kg live weight were applied. The first method consisted of assigning to each restrictedly fed animal the average FI of one to three ad libitum fed litter mates. The second method was applied in batches 6 and 7 only and consisted of estimating FIC with multiple regression based on individual 'ad libitum performance' in the first part of the growing period.

Effects of FI and FIC on daily gain, food conversion ratio, backfat thickness, lean tissue proportion, fatty tissue proportion, lean tissue growth rate, fatty tissue growth rate and lean tissue food conversion were investigated. FI had significant effects on each trait, except on lean tissue food conversion. FIC had significant effects on body composition traits, but not on daily gain and food conversion ratio.

Irrespective of the method used to estimate FIC, results showed that animals with a higher FIC produced more fat and less lean from the same amount of food than animals with a lower FIC. It was suggested that the partition of food energy between energy for maintenance, protein deposition and fat deposition is associated with FIC. The findings confirmed that selection for leaner and more efficient pigs may result in animals with lower FIC, irrespective of the feeding regimen during performance testing.

Keywords

carcass compositionfood intakegrowthpigsselection
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , April 1990 , pp. 333 - 341
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bergström, P. L. and Kroeske, D. 1968. Methods of carcass assessment in research on carcass quality in the Netherlands. I. Description of methods. Rapport Instituut voor Veeteeltkundig Onderzoek, C-123. Zeist, The Netherlands and Annual Meeting, European Association of Animal Production, Dublin.Google Scholar
Brascamp, E. W. 1981. [Dutch Commercial Products Evaluation, 1979-1981.] Rapport Instituul voor Veeteeltkundig Onderzoek, B-180. Zeist, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Brascamp, E. W., Verstegen, M. W. A., De groot, P. N. and Van der hel, W. 1978. The effect of feeding levels on carcass traits in pigs. Proceedings Zodiac Symposium on Adaptation, pp. 150–152. Pudoc, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Cöp, W. A. G. and Buiting, G. A. J. 1977. Feed intake in six lines of pigs and its influence on growth and carcass traits. 1. Feeding twice daily for 20 min per session. Animal Production 25: 291–304.Google Scholar
Fowler, V. R., Bichard, M. and Pease, A. 1976. Objectives in pig breeding. Animal Production 23: 365–387.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. 1977. User's guide for LSML76. Mixed model least squares and maximum likelihood computer program. Ohio State University, Columbus. (Mimeograph).Google Scholar
Henry, Y. 1983. Feed intake regulation in growing pigs. 34th Annual Meeting, European Association of Animal Production, Madrid, Vol. 2, abstract P2.5.Google Scholar
Kalm, E. and Krieter, J. 1985. [Feed intake — new selection criterion.] BauernblattI Landpost 7 December 1985, pp. 39–43.Google Scholar
Kanis, E. 1988. Effect of average daily food intake on production performance in growing pigs. Animal Production 46: 111–122.Google Scholar
King, J. W. B., Curran, M. K., Standal, N., Power, P., Heaney, I. H., Kallweit, E., Schröder, J., Maijala, K., Kangasniemi, R. and Walstra, P. 1975. An international comparison of pig breeds using a common control stock. Livestock Production Science 2: 367–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knap, P. W., Huiskes, J. H. and Kanis, E. 1985. Selection index for central test in Dutch pig herdbook breeding from 1984. Livestock Production Science 12: 85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. and Fowler, V. R. 1978. The importance of selection criteria and feeding regimes in the selection and improvement of pigs. Livestock Production Science 5: 415–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundstøl, F., Standal, N. and Vangen, O. 1979. Energy metabolism in lines of pigs selected for thickness of backfat and rate of gain. Ada Agricullurae Scandinavica 29: 337–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swiger, L. A., Isler, G. A. and Harvey, W. R. 1979. Postweaning genetic parameters and indexes for swine. Journal of Animal Science 48: 1096–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waefler, P., Gerwig, C. and Morel, P. 1983. Relationship between appetite, growth rate, feed conversion and carcass quality of pigs fed ad-lib. 34th Annual Meeting, European Association of Animal Production, Madrid.Google Scholar
Webb, A. J. and Curran, M. K. 1986. Selection regime by production system interaction in pig improvement: a review of possible causes and solutions. Livestock Production Science 14: 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenk, C., Pfirter, H. P. and Bickel, H. 1980. Energetic aspects of feed conversion in growing pigs. Livestock Production Science 7: 483–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittemore, C. T. 1983. Development of recommended energy and protein allowances for growing pigs. Agricultural Systems 11: 159–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar