Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:52:58.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of housing and food restriction during winter on growth of male red deer calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. R. Webster ,
I. D. Corson  and
J. M. Suttie
J. R. Webster
Affiliation:
AgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, New Zealand
I. D. Corson
Affiliation:
AgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, New Zealand
J. M. Suttie
Affiliation:
AgResearch, Invermay Agricultural Centre, Private Bag 50034, Mosgiel, New Zealand
Get access

Abstract

Low winter growth is a characteristic of male red deer and is caused, in part by a combination of reduced appetite and higher energy expenditure due to cold weather. This study aimed to determine whether housing during winter would reduce energy expenditure and increase the growth rate of male red deer calves. An additional aim was to investigate whether food restriction in winter would be compensated for by increased spring growth. In each of two consecutive years, 80 calves were randomly allocated to eight groups (no. = 10) comprising two replicates of four treatments during winter. Groups were housed inside (I) or outside (O) and given food either ad libitum (AL) or restricted (R) to maintain live weight. Winter treatments (southern hemisphere) ran from 22 May to 25 August (year 1) and from 5 June to 5 September (year 2). During these periods, animals were weighed weekly and group food intake recorded daily. At the end of winter animals were moved outside onto pasture and weighed monthly until the end of spring (27 November, year 1 and 7 December, year 2). In year 2 weighing continued during summer, until 4 April. The animals were slaughtered on 28 November and 18 January (year 1) and 5 April (year 2). The effect of housing on live-weight gain (LWG) and dry-matter intake (DM1) in AL groups was not significant in either year. However in R groups, O had a higher DMI than I in both years (P < 0·05) and a higher LWG than I in year 1 (P < 0·05). LWG was loiver in R than in AL groups in winter in year 1 (P < 0·05) and year 2 (P < 0·001) and live weight was lower in R than in AL groups at the end of winter in both years. Live weight was still lower in R than in AL groups at the end of spring in both years (P < 0·01). In year 2, this live-weight difference was not significant by the end of summer. Hot carcass weight (HCW) was greater in AL animals than R animals (P < 0·05) and dressing proportion was higher in R than in AL (P < 0·05) in year 1. GR (an index of body fatness) was greater (P < 0·05) in O than I in year 1 and was greater (P < 0·05) in AL than in R animals in year 2. Differences in GR between treatments were not significant in either year, with HCW as a covariate.

In conclusion, housing calves given food ad libitum during winter did not reduce DMI or increase growth rate. When normal growth rates were prevented by restricting food intake, housing lowered DMI requirement, although such a situation is unlikely to be a useful farm management practice as recovery from the growth check was slow. Annual variations in climate may determine both the food savings made by housing and the extent of compensatory growth of food-restricted animals in spring.

Keywords

food intakegrowth ratehousingred deerwinter
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 64 , Issue 1 , February 1997 , pp. 171 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, C. L. and Moir, C. E. 1985. Effect of winter nutrition of young fanned red deer on their subsequent growth at pasture. Animal Production 40:135–141.Google Scholar
Davies, M. 1991. Rosemaund update on finishing stags. Deer Farming 35: 9–11.Google Scholar
Fennessy, P. F. 1982. Growth and nutrition. In The farming of deer. World trends and modern techniques (ed. Yerex, D.), pp. 105–114. Agricultural Promotion Associates Ltd, Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Fennessy, P. F., Moore, G. H. and Corson, I. D. 1981. Energy requirements of red deer. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 41:167–173.Google Scholar
Grace, J. and Easterbee, N. 1979. The natural shelter for red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a Scottish glen. Journal of Applied Ecology 16: 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, R. N. B. 1979. Seasonal changes of appetite in deer and sheep. Agricultural Research Council research reviews, vol. 5, pp. 13–15.Google Scholar
Loudon, A. S. I. and Milne, J. A. 1985. Nutrition and growth of young red deer. In Biology of deer production, pp. 423–427. The Royal Society of New Zealand, Wellington.Google Scholar
Milne, J. A., Sibbald, A. M., McCormack, H. A. and Loudon, A. S. I. 1987. The influences of nutrition and management on the growth of red deer calves from weaning to 16 months of age. Animal Production 45:511–522.Google Scholar
Moore, G. H., Littlejohn, R. P. and Cowie, G. M. 1988. Liveweights, growth rates, and mortality of farmed red deer at Invermay. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 31: 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, A. M., Suttie, J. M. and Kay, R. N. B. 1984. The influence of artificial photoperiod on the growth, appetite and reproductive status of male red deer and sheep. Animal Reproduction Science 6: 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, A. M., Webster, A. J. F., Smith, J. S. and Simpson, C. A. 1978. Energy and nitrogen metabolism of red deer (Cervus elaphus) in cold environments; a comparison with cattle and sheep. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, A: Comparative Physiology 60: 251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suttie, J. M., Corson, I. D. and Fennessy, P. F. 1984. Voluntary intake, testis development and antler growth patterns of male red deer under a manipulated photoperiod. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 44:167–170.Google Scholar
Suttie, J. M., Goodall, E. D., Pennie, K. and Kay, R. N. B. 1983. Winter food restriction and summer compensation in red deer stags (Cervus elaphus). British journal of Nutrition 50: 737–747.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suttie, J. M. and Simpson, A. M. 1985. Photoperiodic control of appetite, growth, antlers and endocrine status of red deer. In Biology of deer production (ed. Fennessy, P. F. and Drew, K. R.), pp. 429–432. The Royal Society of New Zealand, Wellington.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. N. and Osbourn, D. F. 1960. Compensatory growth after undernutrition in mammals and birds. Biological Review 35:324–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed