Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:44:04.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of nitrogen supply on nitrogen and energy metabolism in lactating sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

H. Everts
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Science and Health (ID-DLO) Branch Runderweg, PO Box 160, NL 8200 AD Lelystad, The Netherlands
R. A. Dekker
Affiliation:
Institute for Animal Science and Health (ID-DLO) Branch Runderweg, PO Box 160, NL 8200 AD Lelystad, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

In 56 balance trials sows received diets in pregnancy containing (g/kg diet) either 24·7 nitrogen (N) (C) or 16·7 N (L) followed by diets in lactation containing (g/kg dietary dry matter) either 28·5 N and 8·4 lysine (C) or 32·8 N and 10·3 lysine (H). N and energy balance during lactation (day 4 to 25) were made during three successive parities (23, 17 and 16 sows in parities 1,2 and 3, respectively). Retention in piglets was calculated from their body composition at weaning.

Mean daily litter gain was 2·72 kg/day and was not affected by the dietary treatments. Mean body-weight loss of sows was 0·67 kg/day and was lower only in parity 2 on lactation treatment H compared with lactation treatment C. N retention was less negative on lactation treatment H than on lactation treatment C (significant in parity 1) and N retention was less negative on pregnancy treatment L than on pregnancy treatment C (significant in parity 3). Fat mobilization on lactation treatment H was higher than on lactation treatment C (significant in parities 2 and 3). The proportion of energy mobilized as protein to the total energy mobilization was significantly lower on lactation treatment H compared with lactation treatment C. Estimated daily N, lysine and Heal digestible lysine requirements for first parity lactating sows were 162 g, 48 g and 37 g respectively. For second parity sows 179 g, 54 g and 42 g and for third parity sows 185 g, 56 g and 43 g. N excretion during lactation was proportionately about 0·6 of ingested N. This resulted in an N excretion of about 2·3 kg N during a 25-day lactation period. After correction for differences in litter size, body weight of sows, daily litter gain and N mobilization increased with parity number.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babinsky, L. 1992. Energy metabolism and lactation performance of primiparous sows as affected by dietary fat and vitamin E. Thesis, Agricultural University, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Beyer, M. 1986. Untersuchungen zum Energie- und Stoffumsatz von graviden und lactierende Sauen soivie Saugferkelm — eine Beitrag zur Präzisierung des Energie- und Proteinbedarfes. Promotionsarbeit, Forschungszentrum für Tierproduktion Dumerstorf-Rostock.Google Scholar
Centraal Veevoeder Bureau (CVB). 1977. [Data about chemical composition, digestibility and feeding value of feedstuffs]. Veevoeder Tabel, Centraal Veevoederbureau, Lelystad.Google Scholar
Centraal Veevoeder Bureau (CVB). 1984. [Preliminary table of digestible amino acids in feedstuffs for pigs]. Voorlopige tabel verteerbare aminozuren in veevoedergrondstoffen voor varkens, januari. Centraal Veevoederbureau, Lelystad.Google Scholar
Centraal Veevoeder Bureau (CVB). 1986. [Nutrient requirements of livestock and feeding value of feedstuffs]. Verkorte Tabel, augustus. Centraal Veevoederbureau, Lelystad.Google Scholar
Centraal Veevoeder Bureau (CVB). 1991. [Data about chemical composition, digestibility and feeding value of feedstuffs]. Veevoeder Tabel. Centraal Veevoederbureau, Lelystad.Google Scholar
Chen, S. Y., D'Mello, J. P. F., Elsley, F. W. H. and Taylor, A. G. 1978. Effect of dietary lysine levels on performance, nitrogen metabolism and plasma amino acid concentrations of lactating sows. Animal Production 27: 331344.Google Scholar
Etienne, M., Noblet, J., Dourmad, J. Y. and Fortune, H. 1989. Étude du besoin en lysine des truies en lactation. Journées Recherche Porcine en France 21: 101108.Google Scholar
Everts, H. and Dekker, R. A. 1991. Effect of protein/lysine supply and of parity number on energy metabolism during pregnancy and lactation in sows. In Energy metabolism in farm animals (ed. Wenk, C. and Boessinger, M.), European Association for Animal Production publication no. 58, pp. 317320.Google Scholar
Everts, H. and Dekker, R. A. 1994a. Balance trials and comparative slaughtering in breeding sows: description of techniques and observed accuracy. Livestock Production Science 37: 339352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everts, H. and Dekker, R. A. 1994b. Effect of nitrogen supply on the retention and excretion of nitrogen and on energy metabolism of pregnant sows. Animal Production 59: 293301.Google Scholar
Just, A., Fernandez, J. A. and Jorgensen, H. 1992. Nitrogen balance studies and nitrogen retention. In Digestive physiology in the pig (ed. Laplace, J. P., Corring, T. and Rerat, A.), Les colloques de l'Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique no. 12, pp. 111122.Google Scholar
Helms, W. 1978. Zur Verwertung von Futterproteinen definierter Zusammensetzung und Ergänzung beim laktierenden Schwein. Thesis, Göttingen University.Google Scholar
Manners, M. J. and McCrea, M. R. 1963. Changes in the chemical composition of sow reared piglets during the first month of life. British Journal of Nutrition 17: 495513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noblet, J. and Etienne, M. 1986. Effect of energy level in lactating sows on yield and composition of milk and nutrient balance of piglets. Journal of Animal Science 63: 18881896.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noblet, J. and Etienne, M. 1987. Body composition, metabolic rate and utilization of milk nutrients in suckling piglets. Reproduction Nutrition Developpement 27: 829839.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Grady, J. F. and Hanrahan, T. J. 1975. Influence of protein level and amino acid supplementation of diets fed in lactation on the performance of sows and their litters. 1. Sow and litter performance. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 14: 127135.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, J. E., Tokach, M.d., Crooker, B. A. and Sower, A. F. 1991. Energy-protein interactions in the lactating sow: metabolites and milk synthesis. In Energy metabolism in farm animals (ed. Wenk, C. and Boessinger, M.), European Association for Animal Production publication no. 58, pp. 349352.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, J. E. 1993. Amino acid nutrition of gestating and lactating sows. Biokyowa Technical Review 5: 118.Google Scholar
Sohail, M. A., Cole, D. J. A. and Lewis, D. 1978. Amino acid requirements of the breeding sow. 2. The dietary Iysine requirement of the lactating sow. British Journal of Nutrition 40: 369376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speer, V. C. 1990. Partitioning nitrogen and amino acids for pregnancy and lactation in swine: a review. journal of Animal Science 68: 553561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittemore, C. T. and Morgan, C. A. 1990. Model components for the determination of energy and protein requirements for breeding sows: a review. Livestock Production Science 26: 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, R., Cole, D. J. A. and Lewis, D. 1982. Amino acid nutrition of the lactating sow: the requirement for dietary lysine. Animal Production 35: 1523.Google Scholar
Wood, A. J. and Grooves, T. D. 1965. Body composition studies on the suckling pig. 1. Moisture, chemical fat, total protein, and total ash in relation to age and body weight. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 45: 813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar