Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:22:03.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of processing barley and wheat grain on the digestion of silage-based diets by breeding ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. M. B. Chestnutt
D. M. B. Chestnutt
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough BT26 6DR
Get access

Abstract

Fifty-six individually penned pregnant ewes were offered silage ad libitum with wheat or barley in a replicated experiment. Each of these cereals was either unprocessed or processed by rolling or milling and was offered at 300 g/day from 6 weeks before lambing and at 600 g/day from 3 weeks before lambing. Five and 2 weeks before lambing, total faeces were collected over 6-day periods. On average proportionately 0·18 of the unprocessed wheat and 0·20 of the unprocessed barley consumed was recovered as intact grain in the faeces. Mean digestibility of the organic matter in the complete diet increased from 726 g/kg on whole to 748 g/kg on rolled and 759 g/kg on milled cereal (P < 0·01) at the 300 g/day level and from 721 g/kg on whole to 766 g/kg on rolled and 772 g/kg on milled cereals (P < 0·001) at the 600 g/day level. When the effect of egested whole grain was removed there was no evidence of an effect of cereal processing on organic matter digestibility and although digestibility of fibre was higher with whole than with processed grain the effect was not significant. Wheat-based diets were more digestible than barley-based diets and, compared with barley, wheat appeared to have a beneficial effect on fibre digestion.

Keywords

cereal grainsdigestionewessilage
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 54 , Issue 1 , February 1992 , pp. 47 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chestnutt, D. M. B. 1990. Effect of forage type on the digestion of whole barley grain by breeding ewes. Animal Production 51: 583–591.Google Scholar
Mould, F. L., ørskov, E. R. and Gauld, S. A. 1983/1984. Associative effects of mixed feeds. II. The effect of dietary addition of bicarbonate salts on the voluntary intake and digestibility of diets containing various proportions of hay and barley. Animal Feed Science and Technology 10: 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., Fraser, C. and McHattie, I. 1974. Cereal processing and food utilization by sheep. 2. A note on the effect of feeding unprocessed barley, maize, oats and wheat on food utilization by early-weaned Iambs. Animal Production 18: 85–88.Google Scholar
Toland, P. C. 1978. Influence of some digestive processes on the digestion by cattle of cereal grain fed whole. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 18: 29–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vipond, J. E., Hunter, E. A. and King, M. E. 1985. The utilization of whole and rolled cereals by ewes. Animal Production 40:297–301.Google Scholar