Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:06:30.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of two methods of feeding the concentrate supplement to dairy cows of high genetic merit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

T. Yan ,
D. C. Patterson  and
F. J. Gordon
T. Yan
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, County Down BT26 6DR
D. C. Patterson
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, County Down BT26 6DR
F. J. Gordon
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, County Down BT26 6DR
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments were carried out with Holstein Friesian early lactation cows of high genetic merit to evaluate the effects on intake and milk production when the animals were offered a concentrate supplement either within a complete diet (CD) or separately from grass silage (separate feeding, SF) through a computerized out-of-parlour feeder system. This system offered the daily allowance of concentrates in four × 6h time windows and the cows could choose to have several accesses to concentrate within each time window. In experiment 1 22 first lactation cows were used in a two-treatment change-over design with 10-week periods, while in experiment 2 48 animals (28 in lactation 1 and 20 in lactation 2 or over) were used in a continuous design with an average of 80 days on experiment. In both experiments the diets on the CD treatment were offered ad libitum with a concentrate proportion of 0·61 in total dry-matter (DM) intake while on the SF treatment grass silage was offered ad libitum and the allowance of concentrate was made equal to the mean concentrate intake of the CD treatment during the previous week. All the animals in experiment 2 were turned out to pasture on 5 April for 120 days to examine the residual treatment effects. Twelve mid to late lactation cows and eight rumen-fistulated beef steers were also used to evaluate the effects of the two feeding methods on nutrient utilization and rumen fermentation, respectively. In the latter two trials, the concentrate on the SF treatment was also offered four times daily but in a conventional trough-feeding arrangement.

In experiment 1 both silage and total DM intakes were similar between the two treatments. However, in experiment 2 silage DM intake was significantly increased fP < 0·002) and total DM intake tended to be higher (P > 0·05) with the SF treatment. Feeding the complete diet tended to increase milk yield in both experiments (P = 0·057 in experiment 1), but significantly reduced both the concentration and yield of fat in experiment 2 (P < 0·05). There were no significant treatment effects on the concentration of protein in either experiment, nevertheless in experiment 1 the yield of protein was significantly increased (P < 0·05) with the CD treatment. When the animals in experiment 2 were turned out to pasture, there were no significant residual effects of the indoor feeding treatment on milk production, or yield of fat or protein. However, the concentrations of fat and protein in milk, obtained during the first 60 days on pasture, were significantly higher for the cows offered the concentrate separate from silage during the indoor feeding treatment. The nutrient utilization and rumen fermentation trials indicated no significant difference between the CD and SF treatments in either whole tract apparent digestibility of nutrients (DM, organic matter, energy or nitrogen (N)) or rumen fermentation characteristics (pH, ammonia-N concentration, total volatile fatty acids (VFAs), or molar proportion of each individual VFA in the rumen liquor). It is concluded that feeding the concentrate within a complete diet rather than separately from the silage had no significant effects on total DM intake, milk production, nutrient digestion or rumen fermentation.

Keywords

concentratesdairy cowsdigestibilitymilk productionrumen fermentation
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 67 , Issue 3 , December 1998 , pp. 395 - 403
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnew, K. W., Mayne, C. S. and Doherty, J. G. 1996. An examination of the effect of method and level of concentrate feeding on milk production in dairy cows offered a grass silage-based diet. Animal Science. 63: 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1990. Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients. Report number 5. Nutritive requirements of ruminant animals: energy. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, Series B 60: 729–804.Google Scholar
Genstat 5 Committee. 1993. Genstat 5. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. P. 1984. The effects of frequency of feeding on milk production of dairy cattle: an analysis of published results. Animal Production. 38: 181–189.Google Scholar
Gordon, F. J., Patterson, D. C., Yan, T., Porter, M. G., Mayne, C. S. and Unsworth, E. F. 1995. The influence of genetic index for milk production on the response to complete diet feeding and the utilization of energy and nitrogen. Animal Science. 61: 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holter, J. B., Urban, W. E. Jr, Hayes, H. H. and Davis, H. A. 1977. Utilisation of diet components fed blended or separately to lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 60: 1288–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Istasse, I., Reid, G. W., Tait, C. A. G. and Ørskov, E. R. 1986. Concentrates for dairy cows: effects of method of feeding, proportion in diet and type. Animal Feed Science Technology. 15: 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayne, C. S. and Gordon, F. J. 1984. The effect of type of concentrate and level of concentrate feeding on milk production. Animal Production. 39: 65–76.Google Scholar
Phipps, R. H., Bines, J. A., Fulford, R. J. and Weller, R. F. 1984. Complete diets for dairy cows: a comparison between complete diets and separate ingredients. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge. 103: 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, L. A., Garnsworth, P. C., Newbold, J. R. and Buttery, P. J. 1993. Effect of synchronising the rate of dietary energy and nitrogen release on rumen fermentation and microbial protein synthesis in sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge. 120: 251–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J. D. 1981. Concentrate feeding and milk composition. In Recent advances in animal nutrition (ed. , Haresign), pp. 35–48. Butterworths, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton, J. D. 1989. Altering milk composition by feeding. Journal of Dairy Science 72: 2801–2814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, G. 1997. Individual animal model—explanation herd genetic report. Technical report reference GS537. Animal Data Centre Limited, Rickmansworth, UK.Google Scholar
Tyrrell, H. F. and Reid, J. T. 1965. Prediction of energy value of cow's milk. Journal of Dairy Science. 48: 1215–1233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Villavicencio, E., Rusoff, L. L., Girouard, R. E. and Waters, W. H. 1968. Comparison of complete feed rations to a conventional ration for lactating cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 51: 1633–1638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar