Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:04:58.839Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of isolation on the behaviour, live-weight gain, adrenal capacity and immune responses of weaned red deer hind calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

A. J. Hanlon
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH
S. M. Rhind
Affiliation:
Macaulay Land Use Research Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH
H. W. Reid
Affiliation:
Moredun Research Institute, 408 Gilmerton Road, Edinburgh EH17 7JH
C. Burrells
Affiliation:
Moredun Research Institute, 408 Gilmerton Road, Edinburgh EH17 7JH
A. B. Lawrence
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0QE
Get access

Abstract

At weaning at 3 months of age (week 1), 30 red deer hind calves were housed in six groups of five animals at a stocking density of 1·5 m2 per head and maintained in these groups for 4 weeks. At the start of week 5, all calves were immunized with ovalbumin (OVA). Fifteen calves, from three groups, selected at random, were transferred to individual pens which restricted visual and tactile contact with others (ISO) while the remaining animals were kept in their groups (GP). The behaviour, food intake, live-weight gain, antibody and lymphocyte responses in vitro to OVA and lymphocyte responses in vitro to the non-specific mitogen, concanavalin A (ConA), of all calves were assessed in each of weeks 5 to 9. Isolated calves had a lower mean live-weight gain than GP calves (P < 0·001), although there were no differences in food intake. Significantly more time was spent lying (P < 0·001) but less time feeding (P < 0·05) and self-grooming (P < 0·001) by ISO than by GP calves. There was no significant difference between ISO and GP calves in the cortisol response to an ACTH challenge test (10 i.u.) at week 11. Lymphocyte responses and antibody titres to OVA were lower in GP than in ISO calves at weeks 7 (P < 0·05) and 8 (P < 0·05), respectively. In contrast, GP calves had greater lymphocyte responses to the non-specific mitogen, ConA, in weeks 7 (P < 0·05) and 10 (P < 0·001) but not in week 9 compared with ISO calves. Differences in lymphocyte stimulation were attributed to the non-specific mitogenic nature of ConA. Factors such as agonistic interactions evident in group housing may have compromised the antibody and lymphocyte responses to OVA by GP calves but conversely the lack of social contact may have also suppressed behavioural activity in ISO calves.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blaxter, K., Kay, R. N. B., Sharman, G. A. M., Cunningham, J. M. M., Eadie, J. and Hamilton, W. J. 1988. Farming the red deer. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Bowers, C. L., Friend, T. H., Grissom, K. K. and Lay, D. C. 1993. Confinement of lambs (Ovis aries) in metabolism stalls increases adrenal function, thyroxine and motivation for movement. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 36: 149158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H., Guinness, F. E. and Albon, S. D. 1982. Red deer: behaviour and ecology of two sexes. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Cockram, M. S., Ranson, M., Imlah, P., Goddard, P. J., Burrells, C. and Harkiss, G. D. 1994. The behavioural, endocrine and immune responses of sheep to isolation. Animal Production 58: 389399.Google Scholar
Coppinger, T. R., Minton, J. E., Reddy, P. G. and Blecha, F. 1991. Repeated restraint and isolation stress in lambs increases pituitary-adrenal secretions and reduces cell-mediated immunity. Journal of Animal Science 69: 28082814.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dantzer, R. 1986. Behavioural, physiological and functional aspects of stereotyped behaviour: a review and a reinterpretation. Journal of Animal Science 62: 17761786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gershwin, L. J., Krakowka, S. and Olsen, R. G. 1995. Immunology and immunopathology of domestic animals. Mosby Yearbook Inc., St Louis.Google Scholar
Gonyou, H. W., Chappie, R. P. and Frank, G. R. 1992. Productivity, time budgets and social aspects of eating in pigs penned in groups of 5 or individually. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 34: 291301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. F. T. 1989. Stress and immunity: a unifying concept. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 20: 263312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanlon, A. J., Rhind, S. M., Reid, H. W., Burrells, C. and Lawrence, A. B. 1995. Effects of repeated changes in group composition on immune response, behaviour, adrenal activity and live-weight gain in farmed red deer yearlings. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 44: 5764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanlon, A. J., Rhind, S. M., Reid, H. W., Burrells, C., Lawrence, A. B., Milne, J. A. and McMillen, S. R. 1994. Relationship between immune response, liveweight gain, behaviour and adrenal function in red deer (Cervus elaphus) calves derived from wild and farmed stock, maintained at two housing densities. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 41: 243255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, L. L., Hagelso, A. M. and Madsen, A. 1982. Behavioural results and performance of bacon pigs fed ad libitum from one or several self-feeders. Applied Animal Ethology 8: 307333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1993. Genstat 5 release 3 reference manual. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
McGlone, J. J., Salak-Johnson, J. L., Nicholson, R. I. and Hicks, T. 1994. Evaluation of crates and girth tethers for sows: reproductive performance, immunity, behavior and ergonomic measures. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39: 297311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parrott, R. F. 1990. Physiological responses to isolation in sheep. In Social stress in domestic animals (ed. Zayan, R. and Dantzer, R.), pp. 212226. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Pollard, J. C., Littlejohn, R. P. and Suttie, J. M. 1993. Effects of isolation and mixing of social groups on heart rate and behaviour of red deer stags. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 38: 311322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, E. O. and Thos, J. 1980. Behavioural responses to short-term social isolation in sheep and goats. Applied Animal Ethology 6: 331339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, D. and Arave, C. W. 1991. Isolation vs. group rearing in monozygous twin heifer calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 31: 147150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, H. S. 1987. Effects of behavioural and physical stressors on immune responses. In Biology of stress in farm animals: an integrative approach (ed. Wiepkema, P. R. and Adrichem, P. W. M. Van), pp. 3954. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veissier, I., Gesmier, V., Le Neindre, P., Gautier, J. Y. and Bertrand, G. 1994. The effects of rearing in individual crates on subsequent social behaviour of veal calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 41: 199210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar