Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:38:33.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of offering mineral blocks to ewes pre-mating and in late pregnancy on block intake, pregnant ewe performance and immunoglobulin status of the progeny

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

T. F. Crosby ,
T. M. Boland ,
P. O. Brophy ,
P. J. Quinn ,
J. J. Callan  and
D. Joyce
T. F. Crosby*
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, Lyons Research Farm, Newcastle, Co. Dublin, Ireland
T. M. Boland
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, Lyons Research Farm, Newcastle, Co. Dublin, Ireland
P. O. Brophy
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, Lyons Research Farm, Newcastle, Co. Dublin, Ireland
P. J. Quinn
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, Lyons Research Farm, Newcastle, Co. Dublin, Ireland
J. J. Callan
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, Lyons Research Farm, Newcastle, Co. Dublin, Ireland
D. Joyce
Affiliation:
University College Dublin, Lyons Research Farm, Newcastle, Co. Dublin, Ireland
*
†E-mail: frank.crosby@ucd.ie
Get access

Abstract

Two experiments were carried out to quantify the intake of mineral blocks by ewes in group- and individually fed situations, and to examine the effects of mineral block intake on food and water intake, colostrum production and lambs' immunoglobulin G (IgG) absorption when ewes are individually housed and offered maize or grass silage with a concentrate supplement. In experiment 1, mineral blocks were offered to 359 ewes either when grazing at mating time (no. = 200) or, when indoors in the last 4 or 7 weeks of pregnancy, the latter as either twin-bearing ewes that were group-fed (no. = 18) or individually fed (no. = 27) or single-bearing ewes that were group-fed (no. = 114). Block intake was measured on a weekly basis. In experiment 2,a2X2 X 2 factorial design was used to compare the effects of forage (grass or maize silage), restricted mineral block access and added minerals/vitamins in the concentrate on food and water intakes, colostrum production and immunoglobulin absorption by the lamb using 64 twin- bearing ewes that were individually housed. Grass silage and maize silage were offered ad libitum, concentrates were offered at a flat rate of 400 g per head per day. Mineral blocks were offered to ewes for 3 h/day. Following lambing, the ewes were hand milked at 1,10 and 18 h post partum. Colostrum samples were assayed for immunoglobulin G (IgG) content. Lambs were blood sampled at 24 h old to determine serum IgG value. In experiment 1, mean daily mineral block intake per ewe was lowest at mating time (19 g) and highest when ewes were individually housed (194 g). In experiment 2, intakes of dry matter(DM) and energy were higher (F < 0.05) in the maize silage treatments. Similarly, when ewes had access to mineral blocks they had higher (P < 0.05) intakes of DM, energy and protein in addition to having a higher water intake (2.24 v. 0.771 per ewe per day; s.e. 0.139; P < 0.01). The mean total colostrum yield to 18 h post lambing at 1734 ±98.0 ml was unaffected by any of the treatments. When ewes had access to mineral blocks their lambs had lower (6.8 v. 18.8; s.e. 1.48; P < 0.01) serum IgG values and the efficiency of IgG absorption from the colostrum into the blood stream was reduced (0.097 v. 0.247; s.e. 0.0214; P < 0.01). In conclusion, the data show that there is wide variation in mineral block intake in different situations and that intake of some minerals can exceed toxic values. Additionally, when individually fed pregnant ewes have access to blocks for just 3 h/day, there is a significant increase in water intake and a dramatic reduction in lamb serum IgG concentration and in the efficiency of absorption of colostral IgG into the blood. We suggest that while mineral blocks can confer advantages in specific situations, there is the need to revisit their formulation and to further research the mode of action responsible for the compromised IgG absorption.

Keywords

ewesIgGimmunoglobulinslambsmineral nutrition
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 79 , Issue 3 , December 2004 , pp. 493 - 504
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural and Food Research Council. 1993. Energy and protein requirements of ruminants. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council. 1980. The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal.Google Scholar
Andrews, E. D., Hartley, W. J. and Grant, A. B. 1968. Selenium responsive diseases of animals in New Zealand. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 16: 13–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boland, T. M., Brophy, P. O., Callan, J. J., Quinn, P. J., Nowakowski, P. and Crosby, T. F. 2004. The effects of mineral-block components when offered to ewes in late pregnancy on colostrum yield and immunoglobulin G absorption in their lambs. Animal Science 79: 293–302.Google Scholar
Bourke, M. J. 1998. Evaluation of the feeding value of maize silage and grass silage for dairy cows. M. Agr. Sc. thesis, National University of Ireland, Dublin.Google Scholar
Bowman, J. G. P. and Sowell, B. F. 1997. Delivery method and supplement consumption by grazing ruminants: a review. Journal of Animal Science 75: 543–550.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brambell, F. W. R. 1970. The transmission of passive immunity from mother to young. In Frontiers of biology, volume 18, p. 166. North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Brown, D. C. and Thomas, E. M. 1989. Feeding maize silage to pregnant ewes. Animal Production 48: 647 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Butler, J. E. 1971. Characteristics of bovine immunoglobulins and related molecules. Journal of Dairy Science 54: 1315–1316 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Clark, R. G., Wright, D. F. and Millar, K. R. 1985. A proposed new approach and protocol to defining mineral deficiencies using reference curves. Cobalt deficiency in young sheep is used as a model. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 33: 1–5.Google Scholar
Coppock, C. E., Everett, R. W. and Merrill, W. G. 1972. Effect of ration on free choice consumption of calcium-phosphorus supplements by dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 55: 245–250.Google Scholar
Ducker, M. J., Kendall, P. T., Hemingway, R. G. and McClelland, T. H. 1981. An evaluation of feedblocks as a means of providing supplementary nutrients to ewes grazing upland/hill pastures. Animal Production 33: 51–58.Google Scholar
Fahey, J. L. and McKelvey, E. M. 1965. Quantitative determination of serum immunoglobulins in antibody agar plates. Journal of Immunology 94: 84–90.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M. 1995. Voluntary food intake and dietary selection in farm animals. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
Ganong, W. F. 1977. Review of medical physiology, eighth edition. Lang Medical Publications, Los Altos.Google Scholar
Hardy, R. N. 1969. Absorption of molecules from the intestine of the new-born animal. In Physiology of digestion and metabolism in the ruminant (ed. Phillipson, A. T.), pp. 150–165. Oriel Press, Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Hill, M. K., Walker, S.D. and Taylor, A. G. 1969. Effects of marginal deficiencies of copper and selenium on growth and productivity of sheep. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 12: 261–270.Google Scholar
Jeffries, B. C. 1961. Body condition scoring and its use in management. Tasmanian journal of Agriculture 32: 19–21.Google Scholar
Joyce, D. 2000. An evaluation of Uniblock mineral licks as an aid to improve efficiency in sheep production. M. Agr. Sc. thesis, National University of Ireland, Dublin.Google Scholar
Keane, N. 2001. Some factors influencing early lamb performance and IgG absorption in March born lambs. M. Agr. Sc. thesis, National University of Ireland, Dublin.Google Scholar
Kendall, P. T., Ducker, M. J. and Hemingway, R. G. 1983. Individual intake variation in ewes given feedblock or trough supplements indoors or at winter grazing. Animal Production 36: 7–19.Google Scholar
Larson, R. E., Ward, A. C. S., Frederiksen, K. R., Ardrey, W. B. and Frank, F. W. 1974. Capability of lambs to absorb immunoproteins from freeze-dried bovine colostrum. American Journal of Veterinary Research 35: 1061–1063.Google ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, A. B. and Wood-Gush, D. G. M. 1988. Influence of social behaviour on utilization of supplemental feed-blocks by Scottish hill sheep. Animal Production 46: 203–212.Google Scholar
McDonald, P., Edwards, R. A., Greenhalgh, J. F. D. and Morgan, C. A. 1995. Animal nutrition, fifth edition. Longman Scientific and Technical, Essex.Google Scholar
McDowell, L. R. 1985. Nutrition of grazing ruminants in warm climates. In Contribution of tropical forages and soil toward meeting the mineral requirements of grazing ruminants (ed. McDowell, L. R.), p. 443. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
McDowell, L. R. 1996. Free choice mineral supplements for grazing sheep in developing countries. In Detection and treatment of mineral nutrition problems in grazing sheep (ed. Masters, D.), pp. 81–94. ACIAR, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
McEwan, A. D., Fisher, E. W., Selman, I.E. and Penhale, W. J. 1970. A turbidity test for the estimation of immune globulin levels in neonatal calf serum. Clinica Chimica Act 27: 155–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council. 1985. Nutrient requirements of sheep, sixth revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
O'Doherty, J. V. and Crosby, T. F. 1997. The effect of diet in late pregnancy on colostrum production and immunoglobulin absorption in sheep. Animal Science 64: 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Doherty, J. V. and Crosby, T. F. 1996. The effect of diet in late pregnancy on progesterone concentration and colostrum yield in ewes. Theriogenology 46: 233–241.Google Scholar
O'Doherty, J. V., Maher, P. F. and Crosby, T. F. 1997. The performance of pregnant ewes and their progeny when offered grass silage, maize silage or a maize silage/ensiled super pressed pulp mixture during late pregnancy. Livestock Production Science 52: 11–19.Google Scholar
Redman, D. R. 1979. Prenatal influence on immunocompetence of the neonate. Journal of Animal Science 49: 258–267.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. J. 1983. Nutrient requirements of the breeding ewe. In Recent advances in animal nutrition (ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 143–161. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Sapunov, A. G., Podshibyakin, A. E., Chebotarev, I.I, and Golovskoi, I. P. 1986. Biological values of ewe's colostrum and milk, and survival of newborn lambs. Vetweinariya, Moscow 9: 65–66.Google Scholar
Smith, W. D., Dawson, A. McL., Wells, P. W. and Burrell, C. 1975. Immunoglobulin concentrations in ovine body fluids. Research in Veterinary Science 19: 189–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1985. Statistical analysis systems, version 6. 12. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. N. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18: 104–111.Google Scholar
Tizard, I. 1992. General feature of the immune response. Veterinary Immunology 4: 1–276.Google Scholar
Underwood, E. J. and Suttle, N. F. 1999. The mineral nutrition of livestock, third edition. CAB International, Wallingford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zervas, G. 1988. Trace element concentrations in biological materials of sheep and, goats of Thessaly area. Animal Science Reviews 7: 49–63.Google Scholar
Zervas, G., Rissaki, M. and Deligeorgis, S. 2001. Free-choice consumption of mineral lick blocks by fattening lambs fed ad libitum alfalfa hay and concentrates with different trace mineral content. Livestock Production Science 68: 251–258.Google Scholar