Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:03:42.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of the stockperson on dairy cow behaviour and milk yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2007

D. Hanna ,
I. A. Sneddon ,
V. E. Beattie  and
K. Breuer
D. Hanna*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK
I. A. Sneddon
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK
V. E. Beattie
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK
K. Breuer
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, The Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK
*
†Email: donncha.hanna@qub.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

The relationship between stockperson behaviour, measured as verbal and physical interactions with the dairy cows (no.=210), during milking and the subsequent milk yield obtained was examined. The numbers of steps and kicks made by the cows during milking was recorded. The behaviour of two stockteams, each consisting of two stockmen, were recorded over 10 weekend sessions. The two teams varied in the types of interactions and when the stockteam that performed more positive interactions worked with the cows (team A), the cows had a significantly higher milk yield (P<0·05) although this difference was small (17·54 v. 17·44 kg). When team A was milking the cows also stepped and kicked on the platform significantly more (P<0·05) compared with team B. The results also indicated that while each stockteam tended to interact with the same cows each session, different stockpersons interacted with different cows. These findings highlight the importance of the rôle of the stockperson in milk output and dairy cow behaviour in a commercial setting.

Keywords

dairy cowshandlinghuman-animal interactionproductivity
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 82 , Issue 6 , December 2006 , pp. 791 - 797
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boivin, X., Garel, J. P., Durier, C. and LeNeindre, P. 1998. Is gentling by people rewarding for beef calves?. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 61: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremel, R. D. and Gangwer, M. I. 1978. Effect of andrenocorticotropin injection and stress on milk cortisol content. Journal of Dairy Science 61: 1103–1108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breuer, K., Hemsworth, P. H. and Coleman, G. 1997. The effect of handling on the behavioural response to humans and productivity of lactating heifers. In Proceedings of the 31st International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology. p. 39.Google Scholar
Breuer, K., Hemsworth, P. H., Barnett, J. L., Matthews, L. R. and Coleman, G. J. 2000. Behavioural response to humans and the productivity of commercial dairy cows. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 66: 273–288.Google Scholar
Bruckmaier, R. M. and Blum, J. W. 1998. Oxytocin release and milk removal in ruminants. Journal of Dairy Science 81: 939–949.Google Scholar
Coleman, G. J., Hemsworth, P. H., Hay, M. and Cox, M. 1998. Predicting stockperson behaviour towards pigs from attitudinal and job-related variables and empathy. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 58: 63–75.Google Scholar
Coleman, G. J., Hemsworth, P. H., Hay, M. and Cox, M. 2000. Modifying stockperson attitudes and behaviour towards pigs at a large commercial farm. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 66: 11–20.Google Scholar
Grandin, T. 1993. Livestock handling and transport. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon.Google Scholar
Hemsworth, P. H., Barnett, J. L., Coleman, G. J. and Hansen, C. 1989. A study of the relationships between the attitudinal and behavioural profiles of stockpersons and the level of fear of humans and reproductive performance of commercial pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 23: 301–314.Google Scholar
Hemsworth, P. H., Coleman, G. J., Barnett, J. L. and Borg, S. 2000. Relationships between human-animal interactions and productivity of commercial dairy cows. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 78: 2821–2831.Google Scholar
Hemsworth, P. H., Coleman, G. J., Barnett, J. L., Borg, S. and Dowling, S. 2002. The effects of cognitive behavioural intervention on the attitude and behaviour of stockperson and the behaviour and productivity of commercial dairy cows. Applied Animal Behavioural Science 80: 68–78.Google Scholar
Hemsworth, P. H., Hansen, C. and Barnett, J. L. 1987. The effects of human presence at the time of calving of primiparous cows on their subsequent behavioural response to milking. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 18: 247–255.Google Scholar
Jago, J. G., Krohn, C. C. and Matthews, L. R. 1999. The influence of feeding and handling on the development of human-animal interactions in young cattle. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 62: 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. O. L. 1976. The effect of disturbances on milk production in cows. The Veterinary Record 98: 41–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, J. O. L. 1978. The effects of visiting parties on milk production in cows. The Veterinary Record 102: 361–362.Google Scholar
Lanier, J. L., Grandin, T., Green, R. D., Avery, D. and McGee, K. 2000. The relationship between sudden intermittent movements and sounds and temperament. Journal of Animal Science 78: 1467–1474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lensink, B. J., Raussi, S., Boivin, X., Pyykkonen, M. and Veissier, I. 2001. Reactions of calves to handling depend on housing condition and previous experience with humans. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 70: 187–199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munksgaard, L. de Passille, A. M., Rushen, J., Herskin, M. S. and Kristensen, X. 2001. Dairy cows' fear of people: social learning, milk yield and behaviour at milking. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 73: 15–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pajor, E. A., Rushen, J. de Passille, A. M. B. 2000. Aversion learning techniques to evaluate dairy cattle practices. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 69: 89–102.Google Scholar
Rushen, J. de Passille, A. M. and Munksgaard, L. 1999. Fear of people by cows and effects on milk yield, behaviour and heart rate at milking. Journal of Dairy Science 82: 720–727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rushen, J., Munksgaard, L., Marnet, P. G. de Passille, A. M. 2001. Human contact and the effects of acute stress on cows at milking. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 73: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seabrook, M. F. 1972. A study to determine the influence of the herdsman's personality on milk yield. Journal of Agriculture Labor Science 1: 45–49.Google Scholar
Seabrook, M. F. 1984. The psychological interaction between the stockman and his animals and its influence on performance of pigs and dairy cows. Veterinary Record 115: 84–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shrout, P. E. and Fleiss, J. L. 1979. Intraclass correlations. Psychological Bulletin 86: 420–427.Google Scholar
Willis, G. L. 1983. A possible relationship between the flinch, step and kick response and milk yield in lactating cows. Applied Animal Ethology 10: 287–290.Google Scholar