Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T19:52:19.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Enzyme supplementation of low or high crude protein concentration diets for broiler chickens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. Pettersson ,
H. Graham  and
P. Åman
D. Pettersson
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S–750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
H. Graham
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S–750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
P. Åman
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S–750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

Previous investigations have established that supplementing broiler chicken diets with appropriate endosperm cell wall degrading enzymes can improve nutrient digestion, and indicated that this could allow lower protein diets to be used. In this study the effect of enzyme supplementation on the productive value of low (192 g/kg dry matter (DM)) and high (227 g/kg DM) protein diets was studied. The diets employed were based on barley, wheat and rye, and the two enzyme preparations used, Glucanase GP 5000® and Novozym-343®, contained β3-glucanase and arabinoxylanase activities.

The high protein diet gave a higher incidence of sticky droppings, but resulted in a higher growth rate and improved food conversion ratio than the low protein diet. Enzyme supplementation reduced the incidence of sticky droppings and also improved growth rate, food intake and food conversion efficiency for both diets, with the Glucanase GP 5000 preparation generally being more effective. Enzyme supplementation improved growth rate on the low protein diet to a level equal to or better than that on the high protein diet, although this was achieved by a better food intake and an inferior food conversion ratio. This study demonstrated that supplementation with appropriate enzymes could allow a reduction in dietary protein level without affecting broiler growth rate.

Keywords

broilerscerealsdietary proteingrowth
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Production , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , October 1990 , pp. 399 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Åman, P. and Graham, H. 1987. Analysis of total and insoluble mixed linked (1 — > 3), (1 — > 4)-(3-Dglucans in barley and oats. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 35: 704–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Åman, P. and Hesselman, K. 1984. Analysis of starch and other main constituents of cereal grains. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 14: 135–139.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1971. Determination of crude oils and fats. Official Journal of the European Communities L297: 995–997.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1984. Official Methods of Analysis. 14th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Fry, R. E., Alldred, J. B., Jensen, L. S. and McGinnis, J. 1958. Influence of enzyme supplementation and water treatment on the nutritional value of different grains for poults. Poultry Science 37: 372–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastings, W. H. 1946. Enzyme supplements to poultry feeds. Poultry Science 25: 584–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesselman, K. 1983. Effects of (3-glucanase supplementation to barley based diets for broiler chickens. (Ph.D. Thesis). Report, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Uppsala, No. 112, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Hesselman, K. and Aman, P. 1986. The effect of (5-glucanase on the utilization of starch and nitrogen by broiler chickens fed on barley of low- or high-viscosity. Animal Feed Science and Technology 15: 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNab, J. M. and Shannon, D. W. F. 1974. The nutritive value of barley, maize, oats and wheat for poultry. British Poultry Science 15: 561–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, E. T. 1982. Starch digestion in fowl. Poultry Science 61: 1257–1267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patel, M. B., Jami, M. S. and McGinnis, J. 1980. Effect of gamma irradiation, penicillin, and/or pectic enzyme on chick growth depression and fecal stickiness caused by rye, citrus pectin and guar gum. Poultry Science 59: 2105–2110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pettersson, D. 1988. Composition and productive value for broiler chickens of wheat, triticale and rye (Ph.D. Thesis), Report, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, No. 177, pp. 1–46.Google Scholar
Pettersson, D. and Aman, P. 1989. Enzyme supplementation of a poultry diet containing rye and wheat. British Journal of Nutrition 62: 139–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1985. User's Guide: Statistics. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Theander, O. and Aman, P. 1979. Studies on dietary fibres. 1. Analysis and chemical characterization of water-soluble and water-insoluble dietary fibres. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 9: 97–106.Google Scholar
Theander, O. and Westerlund, E. A. 1986. Studies on dietary fiber. 3. Improved procedures for analysis of dietary fiber. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 34: 330–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, N. L. and Morris, S. C. 1982. Rapid determination of sugars in cantaloupe melon juice by high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography 240: 257–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willingham, H. E., Jensen, L. S. and McGinnis, J. 1959. Studies on the role of enzyme supplements and water treatment for improving the nutritional value of barley. Poultry Science 38: 539–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar