Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:31:00.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A genetic analysis of wool characteristics and lamb performance traits in Scottish Blackface sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

J. Conington  and
A. Murphy
J. Conington*
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
A. Murphy
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK
*
†E-mail: j.conington@ed.sac.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

Genetic parameters were estimated for wool quality, fleece characteristics and lamb production traits for Scottish Blackface sheep reared under extensive hill conditions in the UK. In two separate studies, heritabilities and genetic correlations were estimated for wool quality traits measured on lambs at 5 months of age and again on the shorn fleece a year later. The wool traits included birth coat length (BCT), 10-point scores for proportion of grey and kemp fibres present in the fleece (grey, kemp), British Wool Marketing Board (BWMB) recommendation (REC), greasy fleece weight (FLWT), BWMB fleece grade (FLGR), and average staple length (ASL). Genetic and phenotypic correlations were estimated between lamb wool traits and lamb live weights at birth (BWT), marking (at mid lactation with an average age of 7 weeks) (MWT), weaning (at an average age of 17 weeks) (WWT) and slaughter (SLWT), average fat depth (AVFD) and average muscle depth (MD). Individual lamb carcass measurements included Meat and Livestock Commission (MLC) conformation score (CONF) and fat class (FATC). Heritability estimates measured on 2524 or more live lambs were 0·69, 0·52, 0·26, 0·42 and 0·31 for BCT, ASL, grey, kemp and REC respectively. Heritability estimates for traits measured on the shorn fleece a year later for 1415 ewes were 0·37, 0·02, 0·57, 0·43, 0·46 and 0·14 for ASL, grey, kemp, REC, FLWT and FLGR respectively. Genetic correlations between FLWT in hoggets and other wool were positive and moderate to high in magnitude, ranging from 0·22 for kemp in lambs to 0·48 for grey in hoggets. Genetic correlations between REC and live-weight traits were 0·39 for MWT, 0·37 for WWT and 0·44 for SLWT. Genetic correlation between ASL and ultrasonic fat depth was 0·15 and for ASL and ultrasonic muscle depth was -0·30. The results indicate that the simple scoring systems derived to assess these traits are useful indicators of fleece quality, are highly repeatable over time and are a good gauge of likely future wool production. The results indicate that selection for heavier, leaner lambs should not compromise fleece quality, as assessed in this study.

Keywords

dual-purpose breedsextensive husbandrygenetic improvementsheepwool
Type
Breeding and genetics
Information
Animal Science , Volume 77 , Issue 3 , December 2003 , pp. 355 - 362
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkins, K. D. 1986. A genetic analysis of the components of lifetime productivity in Scottish Blackface sheep. Animal Production 43: 405–419.Google Scholar
Baxter, B. P., Brims, M. A. and Taylor, T. B. 1992. Description and performance of the optical fibre diameter analyser (OFDA). Journal of Textile Institute Abstracts 83: 507–526.Google Scholar
Bishop, S. C., Conington, J., Waterhouse, A. and Simm, G. 1996. Genotype ✕ environment interactions for early growth and ultrasonic measurements in hill sheep. Animal Science 62: 271–277.Google Scholar
British Wool Marketing Board. 2001. Wool price schedule 2001. British Wool Marketing Board.Google Scholar
Bromley, C. M., Snowder, G. D. and Van Vleck, L. D. 2000. Genetic parameters among weight, prolificacy, and wool traits of Columbia, Polypay, Rambouillet, and Targhee sheep. Journal of Animal Science 78: 846–858.Google Scholar
Conington, J., Bishop, S. C., Grundy, B., Waterhouse, A. and Simm, G. 2001. Multi-trait selection indexes for sustainable UK hill sheep production. Animal Science 73: 413–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conington, J., Bishop, S. C., Waterhouse, A. and Simm, G. 1995. A genetic analysis of early growth and ultrasonic measurements in hill sheep. Animal Science 61: 85–93.Google Scholar
Conington, J., Bishop, S. C., Waterhouse, A. and Simm, G. 1998. A comparison of growth and carcass traits in Scottish Blackface lambs sired by genetically lean or fat rams. Animal Science 67: 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronjé, P. B. and Smuts, M. 1994. Nutrient partitioning in Merino rams with different wool growth rates. Animal Production 59: 55–60.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics, third edition. Longman, London.Google Scholar
Fogarty, N. M. 1995. Genetic parameters for live weight, fat and muscle measurements, wool production and reproduction in sheep: a review. Animal Breeding Abstracts 63: 101–143.Google Scholar
Gilmour, A. R., Cullis, B. R., Welham, S. J. and Thompson, R. 2001. ASREML reference manual. Biometrics bulletin no. 3, NSW Agriculture, Australia.Google Scholar
Jeffries, B. C. 1961. Body condition scoring and its use in management. Tasmanian Journal of Agriculture 32: 19–21.Google Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cook, G. L. and Grantley-Smith, M. 1986. National estimates of body composition of British cattle, sheep and pigs with special reference to trends in fatness: a review. Meat Science 17: 107–138.Google Scholar
Lawes Agricultural Trust. 1983. GENSTAT, a general statistical program. Numerical Algorithms Group Limited, Oxford.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. 1984. Condition scoring of ewes. Leaflet no. 787. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
More O’Ferrall, G. J. 1976. Phenotypic and genetic parameters of productivity in Galway ewes. Animal Production 23: 295–304.Google Scholar
Mortimer, S. I. and Atkins, K. D. 1989. Genetic evaluation of production traits between and within flocks of Merino sheep. 1. Hogget fleece weight, body weight and wool quality. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 40: 433–443.Google Scholar
Newton Turner, H. 1972. Genetic interactions between wool, meat and milk production in sheep. Animal Breeding Abstracts 4: 621–634.Google Scholar
Nsoso, S. J., Young, M. J. and Beatson, P. R. 1999. Correlated responses in greasy fleece weight in Border Leicester and Coopworth sheep breeds selected for leantissue growth rate. Small Ruminant Research 34: 149–154.Google Scholar
Simm, G. 1998. Genetic improvement of cattle and sheep. Farming Press, Ipswich.Google Scholar