Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:05:26.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic and phenotypic parameters for yield, food intake, and efficiency of dairy cows fed ad libitum 2. Estimates for part lactation measures and their relationship with ‘total’ lactation measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

P. Persaud
Affiliation:
Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT Scottish Agricultural College, Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
G. Simm
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
Get access

Abstract

Records on fat plus protein yield, food intake and food efficiency up to 26 and 38 weeks of lactation, were obtained from dairy cows fed ad libitum in the Edinburgh School of Agriculture's Langhill herd. After discarding the first 2 weeks data, the records were divided into successive 6-week periods. Restricted maximum likelihood analyses were carried out on each period for each trait, fitting an animal model, with repeat lactations as an additional random effect. Univariate analyses were done after approximate canonical transformation of the data. Heritability estimates for 6-week fat plus protein yield, food intake and efficiency, from the 38-week lactation data, ranged from 0·08 (s.e. 0·10) to 0·17 (s.e. 0·12), 0·15 (s.e. 0·09) to 0·49 (s.e. 0·15) and 0·08 (s.e. 0·14) to 0·25 (s.e. 0·11), respectively. Generally, lower heritabilities were obtained for earlier part measures of fat plus protein yield and efficiency and for later part measures of food intake. Genetic correlations between part measures and ‘total’ lactation fat plus protein yield, food intake, and efficiency ranged from 0·82 to 100, 0·85 to 0·98, and 0·60 to 1·00, respectively. Corresponding phenotypic correlations ranged from 0·76 to 0·94, 0·68 to 0·87, and 0·73 to 0·89, respectively. The correlations were lowest for the first 6-week period then gradually increased up to a maximum in the third or fourth periods and declined thereafter. The results indicate that selection on a part measure of food intake or efficiency, taken between 15 to 20 weeks of lactation, will be equally effective in improving intake and efficiency compared with selection on total lactation measures. Other 6-week measures taken between weeks 9 to 14 and 21 to 26 will also give good prediction of total lactation intake and efficiency.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Auran, T. 1976. Studies on monthly and cumulative monthly milk yield records. III. Estimate of genetic and phenotypic parameters. Ada Agriculturae Scandinavica 26: 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danell, B. 1982. Studies on lactation yield and individual test- day-yields of Swedish dairy cows. II. Estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters. Ada Agriculturae Scandinavica 32: 8292.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. P. 1987. Part-lactation predictors of complete lactation milk-energy yield, food intake and food conversion efficiency. Livestock Production Science 17: 323335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooven, N. W., Miller, R. H. and Smith, J. W. 1972. Relationships among whole- and part-lactation gross feed efficiency, feed consumption, and milk yield. Journal of Dairy Science 55: 11131122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuirk, B. J. 1990. Operational aspects of a MOET nucleus dairy breeding scheme. Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Edinburgh, Vol. 14, pp. 259262.Google Scholar
Mauala, K. and Hanna, M. 1974. Reliable phenotypic and genetic parameters in dairy cattle. Proceedings of the 1st World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Madrid, Vol. I, pp. 541563.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. 1988. DFREML-programs to estimate variance components for individual animal models by restricted maximum likelihood (REML). User Notes, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Persaud, P., Simm, G. and Hill, W. G. 1991. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for yield, food intake and efficiency of dairy cows fed ad libitum. 1. Estimates for ‘total’ lactation measures and their relationship with live-weight traits. Animal Production 52: 435444.Google Scholar
Persaud, P., Simm, G., Parkinson, H. and Hill, W. G. 1990. Relationships between sires' transmitting ability for production and daughters' production, food intake and efficiency in a high-yielding dairy herd. Animal Production 51: 245253.Google Scholar
Ruane, J. and Thompson, R. 1989. Simulation of an adult multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) nucleus breeding scheme in dairy cattle. In New Selection Schemes in Cattle: Nucleus Programmes. European Association for Animal Production Publication No. 44, pp. 7280. Pudoc, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Simm, G., Persaud, P., Neilson, D. R., Parkinson, H. and McGuirk, B. J. 1991. Predicting food intake in dairy heifers from early lactation records. Animal Production 52: 421434.Google Scholar
Wilmink, J. B. M. 1987. Efficiency of selection for different cumulative milk, fat and protein yields in first lactation. Livestock Production Science 17: 211224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolliams, J. A. and Smith, C. 1988. The value of indicator traits in the genetic improvement of dairy cattle. Animal Production 46: 333345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar