Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T17:42:53.236Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic and phenotypic relationships between conformation and production traits in Ayrshire heifers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

R. A. Mrode
Affiliation:
Animal Data Centre, Lavrock Lane, Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire WD3 3AW
G. J. T. Swanson
Affiliation:
Animal Data Centre, Lavrock Lane, Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire WD3 3AW
Get access

Abstract

First lactation records for production traits (milk, fat and protein yields) and 17 linear type traits for 7169 Ayrshire heifers were analysed to estimate genetic parameters for type traits and to examine the relationship between type and production traits. A multivariate restricted maximum likelihood procedure fitting a sire model with sire relationships included was used for all analyses.

Heritabilities for production traits were approximately 0·3 and genetic correlations among them were high (>0·84). The estimates of heritabilities for type traits were mainly low to moderate ranging from 0·04 to 0·42. Angularity (0·80), beef shape (0·49), foot angle (0·53) and stature (0·46) had higher heritabilities. Generally phenotypic correlations among type traits were lower than the genetic correlations. The highest negative genetic correlation was between rear legs side and rear legs rear (-0·95) and the highest positive correlation between chest width and beef shape (0·93).

Genetic correlations between type and production were low to moderate and were similar for milk, fat and protein yields. The genetic correlations between the production traits and chest width, udder depth and beef shape were negative but were positive between production and angularity, rear udder width and teat placement side.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellamy, H. J., Mrode, R. A. and Swanson, G. J. T. 1992. Estimation of genetic parameters for conformation traits assessed on a linear scale in Ayrshire Cattle. Animal Production 54: 481 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Brotherstone, S. and Hill, W. G. 1991. Dairy herd life in relation to linear type traits and production. 1. Phenotypic and genetic analyses in pedigree type classified herds. Animal Production 53: 279287.Google Scholar
Brotherstone, S., McManus, C. M. and Hill, W. G. 1990. Estimation of genetic parameters for linear and miscellaneous typ e traits in Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle. Livestock Production Science 26: 177192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, B. L., Freeman, A. E. and Metzger, E. 1992. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for type and production in Guernsey dairy cows, journal of Dairy Science 75:11471153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, K., Brotherstone, S., Hill, W. G. and Edwards, M. R. 1987. Inheritance of linear type traits in dairy cattle and correlations with milk production. Animal Production 44:110.Google Scholar
Mrode, R. A. and Swanson, G. J. T. 1994. Animal model estimates of sire × herd interactions for production traits for the major dairy breeds in the UK. In press.Google Scholar
Patterson, H. D. and Thompson, R. 1971. Recovery of interblock information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 545554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, G. J. T. and Bellamy, H. J. 1991. Estimation of genetic parameters for conformation traits assessed on a linear scale in Friesian Holstein heifers. Animal Production 52:611 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Visscher, P. M. 1991. Estimation of genetic parameters in dairy cattle using an animal model and implications for genetic improvement. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar