Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:47:31.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic contributions of Finnish Ayrshire bulls over four generations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

J. A. Woolliams  and
E. A. Mäntysaari
J. A. Woolliams
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Centre, Department of Animal Breeding, SF-31600, Jokioinen, Finland
E. A. Mäntysaari
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Centre, Department of Animal Breeding, SF-31600, Jokioinen, Finland
Get access

Abstract

The long-term genetic contributions were calculated for 219 Finnish Ayrshire bulls born between 1958 and 1964 to 707 Finnish Ayrshire bulls made available for artificial insemination and born between 1986 and 1988. Three strategies were employed:(i) using all known pedigree information; (ii) ignoring information on the dam of females; (iii) only using information on sires. Expected contributions were calculated using gene flow matrices.

The contributions from strategies 1, 2 and 3 were only 0.6 (1 and 2) or 0.7 (strategy 3) of those expected. The causes of this shortfall for strategies 2 and 3 were identified as (i) the use of an imported sire and (ii) generation skipping. For strategy 1, 0.2 of the expected pathways remained unaccounted for and were ascribed to missing pedigree information.

Of the 219 ancestors, only 86 made positive contributions to the descendants. Only 10 ancestors made contributions more than the average, and one bull accounted for 0.3 of all pathways traced on strategy 2. There was general agreement in the relative contributions of individual bulls when assessed using the three strategies.

The rate of inbreeding (ΔF) estimated by regression from 1974 to 1988 and using known pedigrees was 0.0018 per year and the average coefficients of additive genetic relationship among cohorts was increasing by 0.0030 per year. AF was estimated using the contributions calculated by strategies 1, 2 and 3 to be 0.0147, 0.0151 and 0.0125 per generation respectively. These were converted into rates per year by assuming a generation interval of 6.5 years taken from both published and new information on generation intervals in the Finnish Ayrshire population. This gave annual rates of 0.0023, 0.0023 and 0.0019. The estimates from strategy 3 were obtained without the use of any pedigree information pertaining to dams.

Keywords

cattleFinnish Ayrshire bullsgene flowinbreeding
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 61 , Issue 2 , October 1995 , pp. 177 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hill, W. G. 1974. Prediction and evaluation of response to selection with overlapping generations. Animal Production 18: 117–139.Google Scholar
Hill, W. G. 1979. A note on effective size with overlapping generations. Genetics, USA 92: 317–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goddard, M. E. 1992. Optimal effective population size for the global population of black and white dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 2902–2911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goddard, M. E. and Smith, C. 1990. Optimum number of bull sires in dairy cattle breeding, journal of Dairy Science 73: 1113–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindström, U. and Maijala, K. 1971. Development of the coefficients of inbreeding and relationship in the Finnish Ayrshire. Zeitschrift fiir Tierziichtung und Zuchtungsbiologie 87: 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindström, U. 1969. Genetic change in milk yield and fat percentage in artificially bred populations of Finnish dairy cattle. Ph.D Thesis, University of Helsinki. Ada Agralia Fennica 114.Google Scholar
Lindström, U. 1978. Selection intensity for milk yield in 1970–1977 in the Finnish Ayrshire, journal of the Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland 50: 445–454.Google Scholar
Miglior, F., Szkotnicki, B. and Burnside, E. B. 1992. Analysis of levels of inbreeding and inbreeding depression in Jersey cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 1112–1118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mäntysaari, E. A. and Stranden, I. 1991. Animal model evaluation for production and reproduction traits in Finnish dairy cattle. Proceedings of the forty-second Annual Meeting of the European Association of Animal Production, Berlin.Google Scholar
Meuwissen, T. H. E. and Woolliams, J. A. 1995. Required effective sizes for livestock populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics In press.Google Scholar
Simonen, S. 1950. Ayrshireforeningens i Finland historica 1901–1951. In History of Finnish Ayrshire Society. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Van Raden, P. M. 1992. Accounting for inbreeding and crossbreeding in genetic evaluation of large populations. Journal of Dairy Science 75: 3136–3144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolliams, J. A. and Thompson, R. 1994. A theory of genetic contributions. Proceedings of the fifth world congress on genetics applied to livestock production, Guelph 19: 127–134.Google Scholar
Woolliams, J. A., Wray, N. R. and Thompson, R. 1993. Prediction of long-term contributions and inbreeding in populations undergoing mass selection. Genetical Research 62: 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, N. R. 1989. Consequences of selection in finite populations with particular reference to closed nucleus herds of pigs. Ph.D. thesis, Edinburgh University.Google Scholar
Wray, N. R. and Thompson, R. 1990. Prediction of rates of inbreeding in selected populations. Genetical Research 55: 41–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed