Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T07:27:04.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of litter size on milk production of sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. E. Auldist ,
L. Morrish ,
P. Eason  and
R. H. King
D. E. Auldist
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Private Bag 7, Sneydes Road, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
L. Morrish
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Private Bag 7, Sneydes Road, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
P. Eason
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Private Bag 7, Sneydes Road, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
R. H. King
Affiliation:
Victorian Institute of Animal Science, Private Bag 7, Sneydes Road, Werribee, Victoria 3030, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Thirty sows were allocated at their first farrowing to five litter size treatments. Litter sizes of six, eight, 10,12 and 14 were established by cross-fostering within 48 h post partum. Milk yield (Y, kg/day) of sows was linearly related to litter size (L) and was described by the equations; Y = 5·98 (s.e. 0·48) + 0·689 (s.e. 0·046)L, R2 = 0·99; residual s.d. = 0·29; P < 0·001 and Y = 8·20 (s.e. 0·46) + 0·324 (s.e. 0·044)1, R2 = 0·95; residual s.d. = 0·28; P < 0·002 for early (day 10 to day 14) and late (day 24 to day 28) lactation, respectively. The composition of milk from sows suckling various litter sizes remained relatively stable but suckling frequency in early lactation increased linearly in response to increased litter size. Litter size significantly affected the average growth rate of individual piglets; piglet growth rate from birth to weaning at 28 days of age decreased from 283 g/day to 202 giday in response to increasing litter size from six to 14. The relationships between milk yield, average piglet growth rate and litter size indicate that the number of functional glands is the major factor influencing milk yield of sows. Increasing the number of functional glands by increasing litter size more than compensates for any decrease in milk output from individual glands.

Keywords

lactationlitter sizemilk yieldsows
Type
Research Article
Information
Animal Science , Volume 67 , Issue 2 , October 1998 , pp. 333 - 337
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council. 1981. The nutrient requirements of pigs. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Slough, UK.Google Scholar
Atwood, C. S. and Hartmann, P. E. 1992. Collection of fore and hind milk from the sow and the changes in milk composition during suckling. Journal of Dairy Science 59: 287–298.Google ScholarPubMed
Auldist, D. E. and King, R. H. 1995. Piglets role in determining milk production in the sow. In Manipulating pig production V (ed. Hennessy, D. P. and Cranwell, P. D.), pp. 114–118. Australasian Pig Science Association, Werribee, Australia.Google Scholar
Auldist, D. E., Stevenson, F. L., Kerr, M. G., Eason, P. and King, R. H. 1997. Lysine requirements of pigs from 2 to 7 kg live weight Animal Science 65: 501–507.Google Scholar
Elsley, F. W. H. 1971. Nutrition and lactation in the sow. In Lactation (ed. Falconer, I. R.), pp. 393–411. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Hartmann, P. E., McCauley, I., Gooneratne, A. D. and Whitely, J. L. 1984. Inadequacies of sow lactation: survival of the fittest. In Physiological strategies in lactation (ed. Peaker, M., Vernon, R. G. and Knight, C. H.), pp. 301–326. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Hodge, R. W. 1974. Efficiency of food conversion and body composition of the preruminant lamb and the young pig. British Journal of Nutrition 32: 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempen, G. J. M. van, Geerse, C., Verstegen, M. W. A. and Mesu, J. 1985. Effect of feeding level on milk production of sows during four weeks of lactation. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 33: 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R. H., Toner, M. S. and Dove, H. 1989. Pattern of milk production in sows. In Manipulating pig production II (ed. Barnett, J. L. and Hennessy, D. P.), p. 98. Australasian Pig Science Association, Werribee, Australia.Google Scholar
King, R. H., Toner, M. S., Dove, H., Atwood, C. S. and Brown, W. G. 1993. The response of first-litter sows to dietary protein level during lactation. Journal of Animal Science 71: 2457–2463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, A. J., Speer, V. C. and Haught, D. G. 1978. Relationship between yield and composition of sows' milk and weight gains of nursing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 47: 634–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullan, B. P. and Williams, I. H. 1989. The effect of body reserves at farrowing on the reproductive performance of first-litter sows. Animal Production 48: 449–457.Google Scholar
Noblet, J. and Etienne, M. 1989. Estimation of sow milk nutrient output. Journal of Animal Science 67: 3352–3359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Grady, J. F., Elsley, F. W. H., MacPherson, R. M. and McDonald, I. 1973. The response of lactating sows and their litters to different dietary energy allowances. 1. Milk yield and composition, reproductive performance of sows and growth rate of litters. Animal Production 17: 65–74.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, J. E., Cornelius, S. G., Moser, R. L. and Sower, A. F. 1987. A refinement and evaluation of the isotope dilution method for estimating milk intake by piglets. Livestock Production Science 16: 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauber, T. E. and Stahly, T. S. 1996. Impact of dietary amino acid regimen on milk nutrient yield by sows differing in genetic capacity for lean tissue growth. Journal of Animal Science 74: (suppl. 1) 174.Google Scholar
Sauber, T. E., Stahly, T. S., Ewan, R. C. and Williams, N. H. 1994. Maximum lactational capacity of sows with a high and low genetic capacity for lean tissue growth. Journal of Animal Science 72: (suppl. 1) 364.Google Scholar
Schoenherr, W. D., Stahly, T. S. and Cromwell, G. L. 1989. The effects of dietary fat or fibre additions on yield and composition of milk from sows housed in a warm or hot environment. Journal of Animal Science 67: 482–495.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G. 1967. Statistical methods, sixth edition. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
Tokach, M. D., Pettigrew, J. E., Crooker, B. A., Dial, G. D. and Sower, A. F. 1992. Quantitative influence of lysine and energy intake on yield of milk components in the primiparous sow. Journal of Animal Science 70:1864–1872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toner, M. S., King, R. H., Dunshea, F. R., Dove, H. and Atwood, C. S. 1995. The effect of exogenous somatotropin on lactation performance of first-litter sows. Journal of Animal Science 73: 167–172.Google Scholar
Williams, I. H. 1995. Sow milk as a major nutrient source before weaning. In Manipulating pig production V (ed. Hennessy, D. P. and Cranwell, P. D.), pp. 107–113. Australasian Pig Science Association, Werribee, Australia.Google Scholar